Showing posts with label human genome. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human genome. Show all posts

Friday, June 15, 2012

NIH Human Microbiome Project defines normal bacterial makeup of the body

NIH News
National Human Geome Research Institute
www.genome.gov

NIH Human Microbiome Project defines normal bacterial makeup of the body
Genome sequencing creates first reference data for microbes living with healthy adults


Human Microbiome Project logoBethesda, Md., Wed., June 13, 2012 — Microbes inhabit just about every part of the human body, living on the skin, in the gut, and up the nose. Sometimes they cause sickness, but most of the time, microorganisms live in harmony with their human hosts, providing vital functions essential for human survival. For the first time, a consortium of researchers organized by the National Institutes of Health has mapped the normal microbial make-up of healthy humans, producing numerous insights and even a few surprises.

Researchers found, for example, that nearly everyone routinely carries pathogens, microorganisms known to cause illnesses. In healthy individuals, however, pathogens cause no disease; they simply coexist with their host and the rest of the human microbiome, the collection of all microorganisms living in the human body. Researchers must now figure out why some pathogens turn deadly and under what conditions, likely revising current concepts of how microorganisms cause disease.

In a series of coordinated scientific reports published on June 14, 2012, in Nature and several journals in the Public Library of Science (PLoS), some 200 members of the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) Consortium from nearly 80 universities and scientific institutions report on five years of research. HMP has received $153 million since its launch in fiscal year 2007 from the NIH Common Fund, which invests in high-impact, innovative, trans-NIH research. Individual NIH institutes and centers have provided an additional $20 million in co-funding for HMP consortium research.

"Like 15th century explorers describing the outline of a new continent, HMP researchers employed a new technological strategy to define, for the first time, the normal microbial makeup of the human body," said NIH Director Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D. "HMP created a remarkable reference database by using genome sequencing techniques to detect microbes in healthy volunteers. This lays the foundation for accelerating infectious disease research previously impossible without this community resource."

Methods and Results
The human body contains trillions of microorganisms-outnumbering human cells by 10 to 1. Because of their small size, however, microorganisms make up only about 1 to 3 percent of the body's mass (in a 200-pound adult, that's 2 to 6 pounds of bacteria), but play a vital role in human health.
Illustration of a woman with markers indicating nasal, oral, skin, gastrointestinal and urogenital H M P project areasTo define the normal human microbiome, HMP researchers sampled 242 healthy U.S. volunteers (129 male, 113 female), collecting tissues from 15 body sites in men and 18 body sites in women. Researchers collected up to three samples from each volunteer at sites such as the mouth, nose, skin (two behind each ear and each inner elbow), and lower intestine (stool), and three vaginal sites in women; each body site can be inhabited by organisms as different as those in the Amazon Rainforest and the Sahara Desert.

Historically, doctors studied microorganisms in their patients by isolating pathogens and growing them in culture. This painstaking process typically identifies only a few microbial species, as they are hard to grow in the laboratory. In HMP, researchers purified all human and microbial DNA in each of more than 5,000 samples and analyzed them with DNA sequencing machines. Using computers, researchers sorted through the 3.5 terabases of genome sequence data to identify specific genetic signals found only in bacteria — the variable genes of bacterial ribosomal RNA called 16S rRNA. Bacterial ribosomal RNA helps form the cellular structures that manufacture protein and can identify the presence of different microbial species.

Focusing on this microbial signature allowed HMP researchers to ignore the human genome sequences and analyze only the bacterial DNA. In addition, metagenomic sequencing, or sequencing all of the DNA in a microbial community, allowed the researchers to study the metabolic capabilities encoded in the genes of these microbial communities.

"Recently developed genome sequencing methods now provide a powerful lens for looking at the human microbiome," said Eric D. Green, M.D., Ph.D., director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, which managed HMP for NIH. "The astonishing drop in the cost of sequencing DNA has made possible the kind of large survey performed by the Human Microbiome Project."
Where doctors had previously isolated only a few hundred bacterial species from the body, HMP researchers now calculate that more than 10,000 microbial species occupy the human ecosystem. Moreover, researchers calculate that they have identified between 81 and 99 percent of all microorganismal genera in healthy adults.

"We have defined the boundaries of normal microbial variation in humans," said James M. Anderson, M.D., Ph.D., director of the NIH Division of Program Coordination, Planning and Strategic Initiatives, which includes the NIH Common Fund. "We now have a very good idea of what is normal for a healthy Western population and are beginning to learn how changes in the microbiome correlate with physiology and disease."

HMP researchers also reported that this plethora of microbes contribute more genes responsible for human survival than humans contribute. Where the human genome carries some 22,000 protein-coding genes, researchers estimate that the human microbiome contributes some 8 million unique protein-coding genes or 360 times more bacterial genes than human genes.

This bacterial genomic contribution is critical for human survival. Genes carried by bacteria in the gastro-intestinal tract, for example, allow humans to digest foods and absorb nutrients that otherwise would be unavailable.

"Humans don't have all the enzymes we need to digest our own diet," said Lita Proctor, Ph.D., NHGRI's HMP program manager. "Microbes in the gut break down many of the proteins, lipids and carbohydrates in our diet into nutrients that we can then absorb. Moreover, the microbes produce beneficial compounds, like vitamins and anti-inflammatories that our genome cannot produce." Anti-inflammatories are compounds that regulate some of the immune system's response to disease, such as swelling.

Researchers were surprised to discover that the distribution of microbial metabolic activities matters more than the species of microbes providing them. In the healthy gut, for example, there will always be a population of bacteria needed to help digest fats, but it may not always be the same bacterial species carrying out this job.

"It appears that bacteria can pinch hit for each other," said Curtis Huttenhower, Ph.D., of Harvard School of Public Health and lead co-author for one of the HMP papers in Nature. "It matters whether the metabolic function is present, not which microbial species provides it."

Moreover, the components of the human microbiome clearly change over time. When a patient is sick or takes antibiotics, the species that makeup of the microbiome may shift substantially as one bacterial species or another is affected. Eventually, however, the microbiome returns to a state of equilibrium, even if the previous composition of bacterial types does not.

Clinical Applications
As a part of HMP, NIH funded a number of studies to look for associations of the microbiome with diseases and several PLoS papers include medical results. For example, researchers at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston compared changes in the vaginal microbiome of 24 pregnant women with 60 women who were not pregnant and found that the vaginal microbiome undergoes a dramatic shift in bacterial species in preparation for birth, principally characterized by decreased species diversity. A newborn is a bacterial sponge as it populates its own microbiome after leaving the sterile womb; passage through the birth canal gives the baby its first dose of microbes, so it may not be surprising that the vaginal microbiome evolved to make it a healthy passage.

Researchers at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis examined the nasal microbiome of children with unexplained fevers, a common problem in children under 3 years of age. Nasal samples from the feverish children contained up to five-fold more viral DNA than children without fever, and the viral DNA was from a wider range of species. Previous studies show that viruses have ideal temperature ranges in which to reproduce. Fevers are part of the body's defense against pathogenic viruses, so rapid tests for viral load may help children avoid inappropriate treatment with antibiotics that do not kill the viruses but may harm the child's healthy microbiome.
These are among the earliest clinical studies using microbiome data to study its role in specific illnesses. NIH has funded many more medical studies using HMP data and techniques, including the role of the gut microbiome in Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and esophageal cancer; skin microbiome in psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and immunodeficiency; urogenital microbiome in reproductive and sexual history and circumcision; and a number of childhood disorders, including pediatric abdominal pain, intestinal inflammation, and a severe condition in premature infants in which the intestine actually dies.

"Enabling disease-specific studies is the whole point of the Human Microbiome Project," said Barbara Methé, Ph.D., of the J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Md., and lead co-author of the Nature paper on the framework for current and future human microbiome research. "Now that we understand what the normal human microbiome looks like, we should be able to understand how changes in the microbiome are associated with, or even cause, illnesses."

The NIH Common Fund also invested in a series of studies to evaluate the ethical, legal and social implications of microbiome research. While the results of these studies are yet to be published, a number of important issues already have been identified, ranging from how products designed to manipulate the microbiome — such as probiotic concoctions that include live microorganism believed to benefit the body — might be regulated, to whether individuals should begin to consider storing their microbiome while healthy.

After NIH launched HMP in December 2007, the International Human Microbiome Consortium formed in 2008 to represent funding organizations, including NIH, and scientists from around the world interested in studying the human microbiome. The consortium has coordinated research to avoid duplication of effort and insured rapid release of molecular and clinical data sets. It also has developed common data quality standards and tools to share research results.

As with other large-scale collaborative efforts, NIH ensured that the research community could freely access HMP data through public databases, such as the National Center for Biotechnology Information, part of the National Library of Medicine, and at the HMP Data Analysis and Coordinating Center.

The Human Microbiome Project is managed by National Human Genome Research Institute, in partnership with the NIH Office of the Director, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, all part of NIH.

More information about HMP can be found at http://commonfund.nih.gov/hmp/index.aspx. An illustration showing the body sites that were sampled as part of the Human Microbiome Project healthy cohort study is available at: www.genome.gov/pressDisplay.cfm?photoID=20163.
A high-resolution image of the bacterium, Enterococcus faecalis, one of many commensal microbes that live in the human gut, is available in color at www.genome.gov/pressDisplay.cfm?photoID=20023, or in black and white at www.genome.gov/pressDisplay.cfm?photoID=20024.

NHGRI is one of the 27 institutes and centers at the NIH, an agency of the Department of Health and Human Services. The NHGRI Division of Extramural Research supports grants for research and training and career development at sites nationwide. Additional information about NHGRI can be found at its website, www.genome.gov.

The NIH Common Fund supports a series of exceptionally high impact research programs that are broadly relevant to health and disease. Common Fund programs are designed to overcome major research barriers and pursue emerging opportunities for the benefit of the biomedical research community at large. The research products of Common Fund programs are expected to catalyze disease-specific research supported by the NIH Institutes and Centers. Additional information about the NIH Common Fund can be found at http://commonfund.nih.gov.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 institutes and centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit www.nih.gov.

Contact
Raymond MacDougall, NHGRI
301-402-0911
macdougallr@mail.nih.gov
Trish Reynolds, NIAMS
301-496-8190
Reynoldsp2@mail.nih.gov
NCI Press Officers
301-496-6641
ncipressofficers@mail.nih.gov
Bob Kuska, NIDCR
301-594-7560
kuskar@nidcr.nih.gov
Leslie Curtis, NIDDK
301-496-3583
niddkmedia@mail.nih.gov">
NIAID News Office
301-402-1663
niaidnews@niaid.nih.gov
NIH Office of Strategic Coordination/DPCPSI
301-435-5840
weis@mail.nih.gov
NIH Office of Communications
301-496-5787
nihnmb@mail.nih.gov

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Personalized medicine ; Genetic variants associated with HCV treatment response


Personalized medicine ; Genetic variants associated with HCV treatment response

What Is Personalized Medicine?

Defined By Duke;
Personalized medicine is a concept in which a patient’s genetic information is used to identify the best courses of treatment, as well as to identify diseases the patient is more predisposed toward and to work toward preventing those diseases...Read the basics on personalized medicine

Today this blog has compiled a few links from Duke University, EASL, New England Journal Of Medicine , the journal Nature and including other sources related to the science of personalized medicine, in particular the genetic research pertaining to HCV therapy. Research has determined that variations in the IL28B gene have been linked to better treatment response among people with chronic hepatitis C virus. In 2009 we began hearing about a genetic test which could predict such a response when a study from Duke was published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature and followed in the media.

Excerpted from the New York Times 2009 article;

"A Duke University team has now uncovered the principal reason for the disparity between the races. It lies not in differing compliance to the treatment or access to health care, as some have assumed, but in genetics.

Using a genetic test called a genome-wide association study, the Duke team, led by David B. Goldstein and John McHutchison, found that the coding at a single site on the DNA, out of the three billion sites in the human genome, made all the difference in people’s response to the treatment.

The site is close to the gene for a special kind of interferon, known as interferon-lambda-3, and may help control the gene’s activity. Some people have the DNA unit T at this site, and others have C. Since a person inherits two copies of the genome, one from each parent, individuals may have T’s on both copies, C’s on both, or one T and one C.

People with the CC version, or allele, respond much better to the standard hepatitis treatment than do those with the TT allele. The C versions are more common in Europeans than in Africans, and this explains half of the difference in the response between the two races, the Duke team said in a report released Sunday on the Web site of the journal Nature.
The C versions are even more common among East Asians, about 75 percent of whom respond well to the standard treatment, compared with 55 percent of European-Americans and 25 percent of African-Americans.

People with the CC versions may produce more interferons, which are virus-fighting substances produced by cells, than those with TT, though the exact mechanism has yet to be worked out.
Dr. Goldstein, a population geneticist, said the different frequencies of the T and C versions were the result of natural selection, which is particularly effective in the case of disease resistance.
“We have clearly had very strong selection in the human population for resistance to different infectious agents, which have been of different importance in different parts of the world,” he said.

People who have a lower chance of benefiting from the grueling treatment because they have the TT allele might decide to wait until better drugs become available, especially if their liver damage is not severe. On the other hand, African-Americans with the CC allele might be more confident in accepting the treatment, Dr. McHutchison said." Continue reading...

___________________

What Are Alleles?

Alleles are corresponding pairs of genes located at specific positions in the chromosomes. Together, alleles determine the genotype of their host organism.
.
For example, the alleles for eye color are found on chromosomes 15 and 19, and depending on which alleles someone has, he or she may have blue, brown, green, gray, or hazel eyes, and sometimes a mixture of these traits is present.
Source

What Are "C" and "T" Alleles ?

As mentioned above a person inherits two copies of each gene; one from each parent to make up each allele. The IL28B rs12979860 SNP has two alleles or variations which are regonized as "C" and "T".
.
Then What Is C/C or "CC" ?
In Hepatitis C patients who have the C/C pattern simply means that they have two copies of the "C" allele.
.
Then What Is T/T or "TT" ?
The same is true in Hepatitis C Patients who have the T/T pattern or two "T" alleles .
.
What Does This Mean To The Hepatitis C Patient?
Hepatitis C Patients With The C/C pattern or two "C" alleles have the best response to HCV therapy.
.
As for the T/T pattern or two "T" alleles they have the least response to therapy.
.
What If A Person Has The C/T pattern?
.
The C/T pattern would mean the person has one copy of each allele. These people would fall somewhere in between.
.
Summarize All Of This Please
TT - Poorest response to Hepatitis C treatment
CC - Best response to Hepatitis C treatment.
CT- Somewhere in between TT and CC alleles.
.
For an easy to understand article see the 2010 issue of HCV Advocates Newsletter;
The Gene that Predicts— By Alan Franciscus, Editor-in-Chief.
.
___________________

Poster Sessions To Be Presented At This Months EASL

The data presented at the EASL should be considered preliminary until it has been reviewed and published in a peer-reviewed publication.

EASL Site Links;
Upcoming Oral Presentations
Abstracts/Poster Sessions

P3.14: Category 14: IL28b Polymorphism

Category 14: IL28b Polymorphism:
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1195.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1196.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1197.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1198.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1199.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1200.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1201.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1202.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1203.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1203.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1204.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1205.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1206.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1207.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1208.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1209.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1210.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1211.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1212.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1213.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1214.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1215.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1216.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1217.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1218.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1219.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1220.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1221.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1222.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1223.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1224.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1225.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1226.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1227.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1228.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1229.htm
http://www1.easl.eu/easl2011/program/Posters/Abstract1230.htm

___________________

Nature Reviews Genetics

12, 266-275 (April 2011)
doi:10.1038/nrg2951
Focus on: Stem cells

Investigating monogenic and complex diseases with pluripotent stem cells

Hao Zhu1,2, M. William Lensch2, Patrick Cahan2 & George Q. Daley2

Hepatogenesis and liver disease.

To better understand conditions that affect the liver, Rashid et al. established a protocol to differentiate human iPSCs into hepatocytes that recapitulate the adult phenotypes of three distinct liver diseases in vitro15. These iPSC-derived hepatocytes shared marker-expression, morphological and physiological features of normal human hepatocytes. The iPSC-derived hepatocytes made from cells taken from patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency showed the characteristic accumulation of α1-antitrypsin polymers. Of importance, the authors noted little variability in polymer accumulation among multiple iPSC lines derived from the same patient but greater variability among iPSC lines derived from different patients, indicating reproducibility of the phenotype within individual genotypes. In addition, proteosome inhibitor treatment of the cells exacerbated the phenotype, possibly permitting the detection of small but relevant functional differences in genotype; similarly, the assay might detect the impact of environmental modifiers and potentially be used in toxicity studies for the analysis of primary and/or secondary metabolites. This report opens the door to studying more subtle genetic disorders of the liver in vitro. More generally, testing drug–genotype interactions in specific cell types will expedite the efforts of personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics, especially for common variants....Continue reading....

Read Full Text @ Nature

You may have to register to read full text. Click here for free registration. If you choose to "subscribe" for full access to the site there is a yearly cost.

____________________

Review Article Genomic Medicine

W. Gregory Feero, M.D., Ph.D., Editor, Alan E. Guttmacher, M.D., Editor Genomics and Drug Response Liewei Wang, M.D., Ph.D., Howard L. McLeod, Pharm.D., and Richard M. Weinshilboum, M.D. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:1144-1153

March 24, 2011

Another pharmacogenomic example involving agents used to treat infectious diseases concerns the treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), which develops in approximately 80% of patients who are infected with the virus and is a major cause of liver failure.53,54 Successful treatment of chronic HCV infection involves a sustained virologic response, which is defined by an undetectable level of HCV RNA in plasma. Unfortunately, only 40 to 50% of patients who are infected with HCV genotype 1 have a sustained virologic response when receiving the current standard of care for the treatment of chronic HCV infection — injections of pegylated interferon alfa together with oral ribavirin for 48 weeks.53,54 The ability to identify patients with a differential response to pegylated interferon alfa is important in the current era of new anti-HCV drugs because pegylated interferon alfa remains the backbone of therapy, to which many of these new agents are added. Recently, in three independent genomewide association studies55-57 involving patients with chronic HCV infection who were treated with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin, there was an association between a variant in IL28B, the gene encoding interleukin-28B, and the drug response. In one of these studies, peripheral-blood mononuclear cells from patients carrying the variant allele that was associated with a poor response had comparatively low levels of IL28B expression.56 IL28B encodes a protein that is thought to be involved in suppressing the replication of a number of viruses, including HCV.55-58 This example shows how pharmacogenomic genomewide association studies not only have identified biomarkers of response to pegylated interferon alfa but also have provided insights that might be used to determine therapeutic approaches to this chronic infection and to select a drug target for therapeutic development...Continue Reading.....

(Read Full Text @ NEJM; New England Journal Of Medicine)

___________________

IL28B Gene Predicts Treatment Outcome for Liver Transplantation Patients
ScienceDaily (Mar. 2, 2011) —
German researchers have found a significant association of IL28B genotypes to interferon-based antiviral treatment outcome, and to graft inflammation caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV). The study determined that the presence of G-allele serves as a marker for severe HCV-induced graft inflammation, as well as a predictor for unsuccessful treatment.....Continue Reading...

___________________

PDF IL28B & HCV: A step closer to personalized medicine?
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat -
Jan 28, 2011 ...
Under The Presentation Archive See; Journal Club: Liver 1 - "IL28B & Hepatitis C: A Step Closer to Personalized Medicine?" After clicking on the PDF the file will download to your computer.

___________________

Editorial

Genome Medicine: past, present and future

Charles Auffray1*†, Timothy Caulfield2†, Muin J Khoury3†, James R Lupski4,5†, Matthias Schwab6,7† and Timothy Veenstra8

31 January 2011
The field of genomic medicine continues to expand, driven by the efforts of numerous researchers around the world. To celebrate Genome Medicine's 2nd anniversary, we asked our Section Editors what they felt were the most exciting breakthroughs in research in the past 2 years and what the future of genomic medicine might hold. Transformational effect of systems medicineSince we discussed systems medicine as the future of medical genomics and healthcare in the inaugural issue of Genome Medicine [1] , the field has witnessed transformational changes that have brought the prospect and promises of personalized medicine closer to reality. The exponential increase in DNA sequencing capabilities, together with the rapidly declining associated costs, has made whole-genome sequencing accessible to small laboratories, and will soon transform it into a low cost analytical assay. These advances have enabled the emergence of medical systems genetics studies, an approach in which the genetic determinants of diseases are investigated through sequencing of the complete genome of family relatives. For example, sequencing and analysis of the genomes of two siblings and their parents made possible the direct measurement of the inter-generational mutation rate and identified genes potentially associated with two Mendelian disorders [2] ; the gene causing one of these disorders was precisely identified through further exome sequencing in additional diseased patients [3] . Another telling example of both the power and current limitations of the next-generation sequencing approaches is their application to the characterization of the genome, epigenome and transcriptome of monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis, which failed to uncover significant differences associated with the disease [4] . With several thousand genomes now being completed, and tens of thousands anticipated in the coming year, the limitation is already to a large extent, and will increasingly be, on the side of data analysis, as the collection, storage and analysis of the large datasets generated requires the combined expertise of a wide variety of scientists, engineers and physicians [5] . Fortunately, the software, databases and computing power required for these community efforts are now becoming available through computer grids and cloud computing infrastructures, offering an affordable alternative for genome and translational bioinformatics [6,7] . Combined together, genome sequencing and cloud computing will contribute to bridging the gap between systems biology and medicine by opening the way to the precise and low cost assays that are necessary for systems medicine to become a practical alternative to traditional reactive medicine [8] ... Continue Reading...

(Read Full Text @ Genome Medicine)

Related 2010; Musings on genome medicine: Hepatitis
C David G Nathan, Stuart H Orkin Genome Medicine 2010, 2:4 (27 January 2010)
Abstract Full text PDF PubMed Editor’s summary
Recent advances in our understanding of the genetics of response to interferon treatment are intriguing, but further research is necessary before we can achieve a true cure for hepatitis C.



Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Hepatitis C; Human Genome at "Nature"


Good Afternoon Folks,
A few days ago I mentioned Nature.com as a great source for hepatitis c information. The site has just published a series of papers on the Human Genome you may find interesting, I have listed the papers below including the sites free registration link.
..
Reported @ Nature
Nature originally reported the IL28B gene and its importance to possibly achieving a sustained virological response in patients who undergo HCV therapy . Nature later reported that the same genetic variants are associated with the natural clearance of the genotype 1 hepatitis C virus.
.
From Duke, which has a "Center for Human Genome Variation -CHGV"
.Human Genome Variation in the News
Personalization of the Treatment of Hepatitis C
Identification of genetic variants (Il28) that strongly predict who will and who will not be cured of virus by the standard of care treatment, opening the way to the personalization of treatment for Hepatitis C and the development of tailored therapies (published in Nature, 2009)Identification of gene variants that predict who will and who will not suffer significant anemia during the standard of care treatment for chronic Hepatitis C, potentially expanding the proportion of patients eligible for treatment (published in Nature, 2010).

The topic today at nature is the "Human Genome", the site has just published a few papers covering the following; what we have learnt about the genome itself , what is still unknown and what we can expect for the near future.
All these articles can be accessed free, after registration, see below.

The Human Genome Project has been around for almost ten years, not until 2001 did we see the first revolution; when the human genome sequence was first published. Another milestone was in 2010 when nature published the "1000 Genomes Project reveals human variation".

The 1000 Genomes Project, a consortium of researchers from more than 75 universities and companies around the world, two years ago embarked on a mission to catalogue genetic variants — small inter-individual differences in specific regions of the genome — that are found in all human populations. Such differences are quite common, the results of the survey revealed, with each person's genome carrying some 250 or 300 so-called 'loss-of-function' mutations that incapacitate the gene in which they occur.

What is the Human Genome Project?
The Human Genome Project (HGP) is an international 13-year effort formally begun in October 1990. The project was planned to last 15 years, but rapid technological advances accelerated the completion to 2003. Project goals were to determine the complete sequence of the 3 billion DNA subunits (bases), identify all human genes, and make them accessible for further biological study. As part of the HGP, parallel sequencing was done for selected model organisms such as the bacterium E. coli to help develop the technology and interpret human gene function. The Department of Energy's Human Genome Program and the National Institutes of Health's National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) together sponsored the U.S. Human Genome Project.
For more information, see About the Human Genome Project.


Nature/Free Registration

You can register free and read the articles at your leisure.
It does take a few minutes to sign up, and will involve a careful selection of menu items. This blogger selected "other" or "student" while navigating the registration process. Remember when you sign up to fill in the additional box : next to each "other" selection. I was prepared to make a payment, one reason why I have put off registering for so long, but registration was free with many articles to view at no cost. However, some articles will need to be purchased before reading.
At nature click on register located on the top corner of the site. If you choose to "subscribe" for full access to the site there is a yearly cost. Click here for free registration.

The Human Genome;

Editorials
.
Best is yet to come
Ten years after the human genome was sequenced, its promise is still to be fulfilled.
Nature 470 , 140 ( 10 February 2011 )
.
The human genome at ten
Nearly a decade on from the completion of the draft sequence of the human genome, researchers should work with the same intensity and focus to apply the results to health.
Nature 464 , 649-650 ( 31 March 2010 )
.
Review
Initial impact of the sequencing of the human genome Free access
Eric S. Lander
Nature 470 , 187-197 ( 10 February 2011 )
.
Perspectives
A decade's perspective on DNA sequencing technology Free access
Elaine R. Mardis
Nature 470 , 198-203 ( 10 February 2011 )
.
Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside Free access
Eric Green
Nature 470 , 204-213 ( 10 February 2011 )
.

Friday, December 3, 2010

Personalized medicine : Genetic makeup to predict the risk of disease or response to a drug


Description
Personalized medicine centers on being able to predict the risk of disease or response to a drug based on a person’s genetic makeup. But a study by scientists at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis suggests that, for most common diseases, genes alone only tell part of the story. Their research shows the environment interacts with DNA in ways that are difficult to predict, even in simple organisms like single-celled yeast.
.
“Measuring the environment becomes crucial when we try to understand how it interacts with genetics,” Cohen says. “Having a particular genetic variant may not have much of an effect but combined with a person’s environment, it may have a huge effect.”
.
.
The Gene-Environment Enigma
Released: 12/3/2010 9:00 AM EST Source: Washington University in St. Louis
Newswise — Personalized medicine centers on being able to predict the risk of disease or response to a drug based on a person’s genetic makeup. But a study by scientists at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis suggests that, for most common diseases, genes alone only tell part of the story.

That’s because the environment interacts with DNA in ways that are difficult to predict, even in simple organisms like single-celled yeast, their research shows.
“The effects of a person’s genes – and, therefore, their risk of disease – are greatly influenced by their environment,” says senior author Barak Cohen, PhD, a geneticist at Washington University School of Medicine. “So, if personalized medicine is going to work, we need to find a way to measure a human’s environment.”
The research is available online in PLoS Genetics.
To understand gene-environment interactions at the most basic level – at the individual DNA letters that make up the genetic code – the researchers turned to a model organism, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, culled from North American oak trees and vineyards, where it grows naturally. They asked whether growing the yeast in different environments would influence the rate at which the yeast produce spores, a form of sexual reproduction.
This complex trait is heavily influenced by genetics, Cohen’s earlier research has shown. In a study published in 2009 in Science, he determined that just four DNA variants, called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), account for 90 percent of the efficiency with which yeast produce spores.

In that study, the researchers noted that yeast from oak trees produced spores with 99 percent efficiency; the vineyard strains were far less efficient, at 7 percent. Then, they put each combination of the four SNPs in both the oak and vineyard strains, to determine how the genetic variants interacted with one another.
The researchers showed that the four variants “interacted like crazy such that the combined effects of any four variants were always larger than the sum of their individual effects,” Cohen says.

By developing a statistical model to account for the genetic interactions, they could genotype any combination of the four SNPs in either strain of yeast and predict with a high level of confidence their effect on sporulation.

But in that study, the yeast were grown in the same environment – glucose.
In the current study, the scientists grew the two yeast strains with all 16 combinations of four SNPs in different simple sugars: glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, raffinose, grape juice, galactose and a combination of sucrose, glucose and fructose.
“These were all mono- or di-saccharides, so the environments are not radically different from one another,” Cohen explains. “It’s not like we heated up the yeast or froze them, added acids or put them in a centrifuge. We simply changed the carbon source and measured the effects of those four SNPs in the different environments.”
Surprisingly, the researchers found that the effects of the four SNPs on spore production were dramatically different in the different environments. The effects of different combinations of SNPs in one environment were not an accurate predictor of the effects of those same SNPs in other environments.

For example, one combination of the four SNPs increased sporulation efficiency by 40 percent in glucose, but that same SNP combination increased efficiency by 80 percent when the yeast were grown in raffinose.

Indeed, the relative importance of particular SNPs and their interactions were not constant but varied with the genetic background of the yeast strain and the environment.
“Having a particular combination of SNPs was never a great predictor,” Cohen says. “If we didn’t know the environment in which the yeast were grown, we could not accurately predict the effect of the SNPs on producing spores. And if we can’t make accurate predictions about the way environment influences complex traits in yeast, then it will be exceedingly difficult to do so in people.”

The new research raises many questions: what is a human’s environment and how can it be measured? Is the environment a person lived in during childhood important or the environment he lives in now?

Cohen suspects that any environment that matters is likely to leave a measurable molecular signature. For example, eating a lot of fatty foods raises triglycerides; smoking raises nicotine levels; and eating high-fat, high-sugar foods raises blood sugar levels, which increases the risk of diabetes. The key, he says, is to figure out what are good metabolic readouts of the environment and factor those into statistical models that assess genetic susceptibility to disease or response to medication.

“Measuring the environment becomes crucial when we try to understand how it interacts with genetics,” Cohen says. “Having a particular genetic variant may not have much of an effect but combined with a person’s environment, it may have a huge effect.”
Cohen says he’s not hopeless when it comes to personalized medicine. As scientists conduct ever-larger studies to identify rare and common variants underlying diseases such as cancer, diabetes and schizophrenia, they will be more likely to uncover variants that have larger effects on disease. Even then, however, a person’s environment will be important, he adds.
The research was funded by the National Science Foundation.
Gerke J, Lorenz K, Ramnarine S, Cohen B. Gene-environment interactions at nucleotide resolution. Sept. 2010. PLoS Genetics.

Washington University School of Medicine's 2,100 employed and volunteer faculty physicians also are the medical staff of Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Children's hospitals. The School of Medicine is one of the leading medical research, teaching and patient care institutions in the nation, currently ranked fourth in the nation by U.S. News & World Report. Through its affiliations with Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Children's hospitals, the School of Medicine is linked to BJC HealthCare.

Friday, November 26, 2010

Human genome: The first synthetic species

Steve Kroft profiles famous microbiologist J. Craig Venter, whose scientists have already mapped the human genome and created what he calls "the first synthetic species."
J. Craig Venter: Designing Life
.
November 21, 2010 5:02

.,
Hepatitis C
,
Duke Institute for Genome
,
The Center for Human Genome Variation (CHGV) was formed in 2005 as a Center within the Duke Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, and in February 2010 was named an independent Center under the Duke University School of Medicine. Under the direction of Dr. David Goldstein, the CHGV is undertaking bold projects, with cutting-edge technologies, and a vibrant team of researchers with the goal of changing how genetics informs patient care
.
Current Projects
1. We plan to follow-up the success of the previous findings and investigate the functional mechanism underlying the observed genetic associations.
2. We also plan to extend our research to patients infected with various strains of Hepatitis C and patients being treated with novel drug regimes under development.

Additional Publications
Thomas et al.
Nature, 2009 Oct8;461(7265)798-801.
Thompson et al.
Gastroenterology, 2010.
Rallón et al.
AIDS, 2010.Researchers discover areas in human genome that may help find causes of certain disorders
/
.

Links Of Interest

.

Researchers discover areas in human genome that may help find causes of certain disorders
By Thomas H. Maugh II

Nov. 4, 2010 Only 10 years after scientists laboriously unraveled the first sequence of a human genome, an international team said Wednesday they have sequenced the bulk of the genomes from more than 800 people in the pilot stage of the so-called 1000 Genomes Project that aims to complete 2,500 sequences by the end of 2012 at a cost of $120 million.

,

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Human Genome Sciences

Update Today : Lupus Drug FDA Approves Human Genome Drug (HGSI)
Human Genome Sciences Inc. has drugs in its pipeline that include novel drugs to treat hepatitis C, lupus, inhalation anthrax, and cancer.

In October the companies drug Zalbin (albinterferon alfa-2b, known in Europe as Joulferon) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, decided not to continue the development of the drug: Human Genome Sciences Receives Complete Response Letter from FDA on Zalbin BLA for Chronic Hepatitis C


Recapturing the magic at Human Genome Sciences
By Toni Clarke

BOSTON Fri Nov 5, 2010 1:43pm EDT

BOSTON (Reuters) - In early 2009, the board of directors of Human Genome Sciences Inc (HGSI.O) met in the conference room at the company's headquarters in Rockville, Maryland. A pall hung over the room. The debt-ridden company, which had, in its heyday, been one the highest-flying stocks in the biotech sector, was close to insolvency.

Its only hope for recovery lay in the pending release of data from a late-stage clinical trial of Benlysta, its experimental drug for Lupus, a complex disorder for which no new therapy had been developed in half a century. Earlier data from a smaller trial had been mixed, and investors, for the most part, had written the drug off.

"We all realized that our whole story hinged on the Benlysta data," said Augustine Lawlor, a board member and managing partner at HealthCare Ventures LLC, a venture capital company. "We were all very quiet. We knew that if we didn't have great data from Benlysta we were done as a company."

Over sandwiches, the board listened as Thomas Watkins, the company's chief executive officer; David Stump, its vice president of research and development; and William Freimuth, head of clinical research into immunology and infectious diseases, reviewed the clinical protocol for Benlysta, and the data they had used to determine their strategy.

"I remember very distinctly going home after that board meeting and thinking, "These guys, I think they're going to do it," Lawlor said.

Less than six months later the drug met the main goal of a late-stage clinical trial known as BLISS-52, sending Human Genome Sciences shares soaring more than 340 percent in the days following and breathing new life into a company that had spent nearly a decade in the wilderness.

"This was the defining moment for the company," said David Southwell, its chief financial officer. Within two weeks, the company had raised $367 million through a sale of new stock.

Now Human Genome Sciences is holding its collective breath again as it waits to hear whether the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will approve the product. On November 12, FDA staff will release documents that will help inform a discussion to be held on November 16 by a panel of FDA advisers. The agency is expected to make its decision by the end of the year.

If the drug is approved, some analysts estimate it could generate annual sales of more than $3 billion, placing the company into the biotech big leagues and challenging CEO Watkins with the task of shaping a new identity for the company while retaining the positive elements of its heritage.

GENOMICS BUBBLE

In June, 2000, at a White House ceremony, Bill Clinton, the President of the United States and Tony Blair, Britain's Prime Minister, joined to announce the completion of the first survey of the human genome - the genetic blueprint of human beings - a feat that would, they said, lead to new ways to prevent, diagnose and treat disease.

"Without a doubt, this is the most important, most wondrous map ever produced by humankind," Clinton said. "Today, we are learning the language in which God created life. We are gaining ever more awe for the complexity, the beauty, the wonder of God's most divine and sacred gift."

The event was emblematic of the frenetic interest in genomics; and Human Genome Sciences, whose mission was to isolate genes and identify their function in order to develop new drugs, was the leading beneficiary of what was, in retrospect, a biotech bubble.

In February that year, the company's shares, currently trading at around $26, were trading at more than $115, even though it did not have a single drug on the market. Its flamboyant founder and chief executive, William Haseltine, was making bold predictions that the company's technology would speed the drug discovery process by years, and venture capitalists were falling over themselves to invest.

"Human Genome was the poster child for the genomic bubble," said Kris Jenner, a portfolio manager at T.Rowe Price Healthcare Sciences Fund, one of the company's biggest and longest-standing shareholders. "That was the go-go period where every six to nine months the company was raising more money."

Between 1992, when the company was formed, and 2000, Human Genome Sciences had raised more than $2 billion in the public markets. In 1993 it entered into one of the biggest deals the sector had seen - a $125 million partnership with SmithKline Beecham, now GlaxoSmithKline Plc (GSK.L).

"I knew what the public markets in biotech were like," Haseltine said. "I knew this was an exceptionally good time for fundraising."

But the fruits of the genomics revolution have been slow to materialize, and several of the company's drugs failed in clinical trials. By March, 2009, amid skepticism Benlysta would succeed, the company's stock dipped below 50 cents a share.

"At one time we gave out turkeys at Christmas," said Haseltine, who retired as CEO in 2004. "Then everyone wanted stock -- but by the time I left they said, 'Please give us the turkey!' I think that sums it up."

In many ways, the path traced by Human Genome Sciences is typical of biotechnology companies founded by scientific visionaries. At a certain point, the vision must turn into business. And rarely are the scientists successful long-term CEOs.

Haseltine, a former Harvard professor and leading AIDS researcher, by his own admission had little interest in the day-to-day operations of the business, and by 2004 it was clear to the board, and to Haseltine himself, that a change in leadership was needed.

"It was time for me to go as part of the creative destruction process," Haseltine said. "I really understood the science, but had no understanding, or even interest in, late stage development or marketing."

STEERING A COURSE FOR THE FUTURE

The person on whom the mantel fell was Watkins, a nearly 20-year veteran of Abbott Laboratories (ABT.N), a diversified healthcare company well known for turning out skilled business leaders.

Watkins, 57, is the antithesis of Haseltine. Where Haseltine, a mercurial scientist, captured headlines with his bold vision of the future, his ability equally to charm and enrage, and his ethereal management style, Watkins is a low-key strategic thinker who keeps his emotions in check.

"Tom does not have extremely big emotional highs and lows," said Jerry Karabelas, the company's chairman. "He's very, very steady, which makes him a very strong manager, particularly in a biotech company where every day there is an up and a down. If you get too excited about the highs you'll get too depressed about the lows."

While Haseltine was a jet-setter who married Gale Hayman, creator of Giorgio perfume, Watkins, an only child who grew up in Cleveland, Ohio, lives quietly with his wife and three children.

Watkins, whose father, Hays Thomas Watkins, was formerly the chief executive of CSX Corp, the railroad company, graduated from the College of William and Mary and the University of Chicago, and went on to work at accounting firm Arthur Andersen & Co and McKinsey and Co, a management consultancy. He joined Abbott in 1985, where he served in multiple managerial capacities before joining Human Genome Sciences.

"Tom came into HGSI at a time when the company desperately needed discipline, focus and a leader who has very strong operational strengths, and he has all those things," said Jenner.

Watkins streamlined the company and focused it on a core group of products, most prominently Benlysta, and he took command of every detail of the company's operations.

"If I get a rumor from Wall Street that the short interest is up, or hedge funds are selling, he always wants it," said CFO Southwell. "He is a magnet for information, but at the same time he solicits a lot of advice."
Now Watkins has the job, potentially, of managing success -- of maximizing the value of Benlysta, which if approved could be on the market early next year, and harnessing the potential of the company's portfolio of genes in a way that could turn Haseltine's vision into a viable business.

"We are starting to pull off the shelf some exciting targets that the company discovered in the 1990s and which we believe have promise," he said. "We're doing animal work with the objective of putting a number into clinical trials over the next few years."

Watkins has a clear idea of where he wants his company to be in five years, and in 25 years.

"I regard Genentech as the premiere company from the standpoint of what they have created," he said, referring to the maker of cancer drugs such as Herceptin and Avastin. "I'd like for us to mean to the industry in 25 years what Genentech has meant to it over the last 25 years."

(Reporting by Toni Clarke; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6A447G20101105?pageNumber=3