Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Merck's Keytruda fails late-stage study in liver cancer patients

Reuters
Merck's Keytruda fails late-stage study in liver cancer patients
(Reuters) - Merck & Co Inc’s cancer drug Keytruda failed a late-stage trial’s main goals of slowing disease progression and extending the life of patients with a common type of liver cancer, the company said on Tuesday.

The results could hamper prospects for the drug, which had received an accelerated approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in November as a treatment for patients with advanced liver cancer who had been previously treated with Bayer AG’s Nexavar. 

Press Release
KENILWORTH, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today announced that the pivotal Phase 3 KEYNOTE-240 trial evaluating KEYTRUDA, Merck’s anti-PD-1 therapy, plus best supportive care, for the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were previously treated with systemic therapy, did not meet its co-primary endpoints of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo plus best supportive care. In the final analysis of the study, there was an improvement in OS for patients treated with KEYTRUDA compared to placebo, however these OS results did not meet statistical significance per the pre-specified statistical plan (HR=0.78 [95% CI, 0.611-0.998]; p=0.0238). Results for PFS were also directionally favorable in the KEYTRUDA arm compared with placebo but did not reach statistical significance (HR=0.78 [95% CI, 0.61-0.99]; p=0.0209). The key secondary endpoint of objective response rate (ORR) was not formally tested, since superiority was not reached for OS or PFS. The safety profile of KEYTRUDA in this trial was consistent with that observed in previously reported studies. Results will be presented at an upcoming medical meeting and have been shared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for discussion.

“While we are disappointed KEYNOTE-240 did not meet its co-primary endpoints, the results for overall survival, progression-free survival and objective response rate are generally consistent with findings from the Phase 2 study, KEYNOTE-224, which led to the accelerated approval of KEYTRUDA for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have been previously treated with sorafenib,” said Dr. Roy Baynes, senior vice president and head of global clinical development, chief medical officer, Merck Research Laboratories. “We sincerely thank the patients and investigators for their participation in this study and are committed to helping patients diagnosed with this common and difficult-to-treat type of liver cancer.”

KEYTRUDA is being studied across multiple settings and lines of therapy for HCC through our broad clinical program that includes 10 clinical trials sponsored by Merck or in collaborations. As monotherapy in second-line HCC, in addition to KEYNOTE-240 and KEYNOTE-224, KEYTRUDA is being investigated in the ongoing Phase 3, KEYNOTE-394 trial, a randomized, double-blind trial evaluating KEYTRUDA in combination with best supportive care, compared to placebo in combination with best supportive care, in Asian patients with advanced HCC who were previously treated with systemic therapy. In addition, there are several ongoing trials investigating KEYTRUDA in combination with other treatments, including therapies through our collaborations.

About KEYNOTE-240
KEYNOTE-240 is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02702401) evaluating KEYTRUDA plus best supportive care compared to placebo plus best supportive care in patients with advanced HCC who were previously treated with systemic therapy. The primary endpoints are OS and PFS. The secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response, disease control rate and time to progression. The study enrolled 413 patients who were randomized to receive either KEYTRUDA (200 mg fixed dose every three weeks for up to 35 cycles of treatment [up to approximately two years]) plus best supportive care (including pain management and management of other potential complications including ascites per local standards of care) or placebo plus best supportive care. 

Understanding Liver Disease with Dr. Joe Galati

In this timeless patient-friendly video, Dr. Joe Galati will explain medical jargon used to describe common and possible severe symptoms of liver disease, relaunched this month by Liver Specialists of Texas, located in Houston.

Topics
Varices
Encephalopathy - Video
Ascites
Peritonitis infection of ascitic fluid
Fever
Abdominal Pain
Shortness of breath
Chest Pain
Headache
Jaundice
Liver transplant evaluation



Links
View additional videos on Dr. Galati's YouTube Channel, connect on Facebook, follow on twitter, or visit both his blog and website.

Monday, February 18, 2019

The Year in Viral Hepatitis: Part 1

Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News
The Year in Viral Hepatitis: Part 1
Feb 18, 2019
Although 2018 saw no major drug approvals or dramatic breakthroughs for viral hepatitis, researchers continued to make progress against these infections. We asked Drs. Ira Jacobson and Saikiran Kilaru for an overview of the most important findings reported last year.

*** Free registration may be required to view article

Friday, February 15, 2019

Hepatitis C and HIV/AIDS Medications Costliest Group of Outpatient Prescription Drugs for Medicaid

Kaiser Family Foundation
Analysis Finds that Medications for Hepatitis C and HIV/AIDS Are the Costliest Group of Outpatient Prescription Drugs for Medicaid, While Diabetes Drugs Have Posted the Sharpest Rise in Costs 
Chris Lee
Published: Feb 15, 2019
Antiviral medications, including those that treat hepatitis C and HIV/AIDS, cost the Medicaid program more money (before rebates) than any other group of outpatient prescription drugs for each year from 2014 to 2017, according to a new KFF analysis.

The analysis of utilization and spending trends finds that antivirals accounted for more than 13 percent of the $63.6 billion in Medicaid outpatient drug spending pre-rebates in 2017 — a level disproportionate to their utilization and a reflection of the high cost of these drugs. Drugs for diabetes were the second most costly group that year, accounting for 10 percent of Medicaid outpatient drug spending before rebates. Spending for diabetes drugs rose faster than for any other group, nearly doubling from 2014 to 2017 — largely due to the rising price of insulin.




On This Blog 
Link to research and news articles addressing the high cost of hepatitis C drugs; insurance restrictions implemented by private insurers/Medicaid/Medicare and the effectiveness, safety and availability of generic versions of hepatitis C medications. 

Thursday, February 14, 2019

Direct-acting antivirals reduce risk of premature mortality and liver cancer for people with chronic hepatitis C

Page updated with additional links on Feb 14, 2019

The Lancet
Published: February 11, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32111-1
Clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a prospective cohort study
Although direct-acting antivirals have been used extensively to treat patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, their clinical effectiveness has not been well reported. We compared the incidence of death, hepatocellular carcinoma, and decompensated cirrhosis between patients treated with direct-acting antivirals and those untreated, in the French ANRS CO22 Hepather cohort.
Continue to "full-text article"
PDF shared on twitter by @HenryEChang

Direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C - Linked Comment
Writing in a linked Comment, Dr Raymond T Chung, Director of the Liver Center at Massachusetts General Hospital, USA, says: 
"The study by Carrat and colleagues offers substantive evidence that cure of HCV delivered by all-oral direct-acting antiviral regimens is associated with clinical benefits. These findings firmly counter those of a Cochrane review of direct-acting antiviral treatment trials that could neither confirm nor reject if direct-acting antivirals had an effect on long-term HCV-related morbidity and mortality. They also provide the best evidence to date to support guidance documents that recommend direct-acting antiviral treatment for all patients with chronic HCV infection. Finally, they provide credence to the achievability of the goals set out by WHO, not only to eliminate HCV but also to substantially reduce its complications." 
Read full comment here....

Media Coverage
Patient-friendly article
Feb 14, 2019
Scientists have firmly established an association between direct-acting antiviral treatment and a lower risk of liver cancer and death.

Feb 11, 2019
Direct-acting antivirals reduce risk of premature mortality and liver cancer for people with chronic hepatitis C 
Professor Fabrice Carrat of the Sorbonne Université, France, said: "Taking a large cohort like this provides the opportunity to evaluate the effect of direct-acting antiviral therapy on the long-term outcomes of patients with hepatitis C. We saw a reduction of risk for complications related to the disease, and to mortality, and believe this treatment should be considered for all patients with chronic hepatitis C infection."

The first prospective, longitudinal study investigating treatment of chronic hepatitis C with direct-acting antivirals finds that the treatment is associated with reduced risk of mortality and liver cancer, according to a study published in The Lancet.

The research is the first to demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals on the disease and suggests that they should be considered for all patients with chronic hepatitis C infection.

For ethical reasons a trial with a control arm is not possible and researchers approached this by setting up an observational study of around 10,000 patients. At follow up, about three-quarters had been treated with direct-action antivirals and a quarter were untreated. The incidence of death and hepatocellular carcinoma - the most common form of liver cancer - were significantly decreased in patients who were treated. Their risk of decompensated cirrhosis was not reduced by the treatment.

Around the world, an estimated 71 million people are chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). The infection causes complications such as cirrhosis, liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, and many people die as a result. Over the last 15 years, these complications have tripled and models predict they will peak between 2030 and 2035. The World Health Organization (WHO) has set targets for the elimination of hepatitis C, and a reduction of related complications. Recently, a modelling study published in The Lancet found that major progress towards these targets by 2030 is possible, but will require vast improvements in screening, prevention, and treatment [1].

Previous work has shown there is a reduction of risk for complications and mortality in patients who are treated with interferon or direct-acting antivirals, but few studies have compared treated and untreated patients. The aim of direct-acting antiviral drugs is to achieve a sustained virological response, meaning that the virus is undetectable in the blood of the patients. A recent Cochrane Review [2] found no evidence for or against the treatment having a long-term effect on death and disease, so this large study is timely, and may help doctors and patients with treatment plans.

In this study, 10,166 patients were recruited from 32 centres in France. At a median of 33 months, 9,895 patients had available follow up information and were included in the analysis, with 7,344 treated with direct-acting antivirals and 2,551 untreated. During follow-up, 218 patients died (129 treated, 89 untreated), 258 reported hepatocellular carcinoma (187 treated, 71 untreated), and 106 had decompensated cirrhosis (74 treated, 32 untreated).

Overall, the study finds that direct-acting antiviral treatment is associated with reduced risk for global mortality and hepatocellular cancer, but not decompensation of cirrhosis. The researchers initially found an increase in risk associated with treatment with direct-acting antiviral treatment, but once they had adjusted for variables such as age, sex, body-mass index, severity of liver disease, geographical origin, infection route and other factors, they found a reduced risk.

Patients who were treated were 52% less likely to die prematurely than people who were not treated (the estimated adjusted risk of death at one year in untreated patients in the cohort is 84 deaths per 10,000 patients, and in those who were treated was 40 per 10,000), and 33% less likely to present with hepatocellular carcinoma (the estimated adjusted risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma within a year in untreated patients in the cohort was 129 cases per 10,000 patients, and 86 per 10,000 in people who were treated). [3]

In a subgroup of 3,045 patients with cirrhosis at baseline, the same association was found for mortality and hepatocellular cancer, provided the patients achieved an undetectable level of HCV in their blood. The researchers believe this is because the treatment induces a sustained virological response, allowing the liver to regenerate which decreases risk.

Professor Fabrice Carrat of the Sorbonne Université, France, said: "Taking a large cohort like this provides the opportunity to evaluate the effect of direct-acting antiviral therapy on the long-term outcomes of patients with hepatitis C. We saw a reduction of risk for complications related to the disease, and to mortality, and believe this treatment should be considered for all patients with chronic hepatitis C infection." [4]

In the study, only a few patients underwent liver biopsy to confirm cirrhosis, with platelet levels or prothrombin time - a blood test - used to classify whether a patient had cirrhosis or not. A validation study using other non-invasive markers of fibrosis suggested that their methods correctly classified cirrhosis in the patients.

Patients who received more than one course of direct-acting antivirals were considered to have had continuous exposure, even where there may have been a lag time or if the first course may not have been associated with sustained virological response. This should have underestimated the response to the drugs rather than overestimated them so does not affect the result.

The study excluded patients with a history of decompensated cirrhosis and liver transplantation and these are the patients who would be at highest risk for complications. The potential benefits of treatment in this group could be underestimated because of their exclusion, as trial data shows improvements in liver function in patients with decompensated cirrhosis who achieved a sustained virological response.
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-02/tl-pss020819.php

Recommended Reading
lastair Heffernan, MResProf Graham S Cooke, DPhilShevanthi Nayagam, PhDProf Mark Thursz, MDProf Timothy B Hallett, PhD
Jan 28, 2019
The revolution in hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment through the development of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has generated international interest in the global elimination of the disease as a public health threat. In 2017, this led WHO to establish elimination targets for 2030. We evaluated the impact of public health interventions on the global HCV epidemic and investigated whether WHO's elimination targets could be met.

Netflix Model -Countries Use Novel Strategies to Tackle Price of HCV Drugs

Countries Use Novel Strategies to Tackle Price of HCV Drugs
Roxanne Nelson, RN, BSN
February 14, 2019
A recent study suggests that the WHO's goal of eliminating HCV infections worldwide by 2030 is potentially feasible but faces some daunting challenges, including the cost of DAAs.
To help overcome some of the barriers to treatment access, Australia and Brazil are each exploring innovative methods to circumvent the cost. Two perspective articles published February 14 in the New England Journal of Medicine outline how they hope to accomplish this goal.
The healthcare system in Australia is complex but is generally funded by the government. Drugs that are on the national formulary are usually paid for by the government. To help make DAAs more affordable to patients and the healthcare system, the Australian government has rolled out a strategy, nicknamed the "Netflix" plan because it is similar to the movie subscription service, in which payment is for bulk access.
Read more: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/909083 

New England Journal of Medicine
Perspective
Universal Medicine Access through Lump-Sum Remuneration — Australia’s Approach to Hepatitis C
Suerie Moon, M.P.A., Ph.D., and Elise Erickson, M.A.
High prices can restrict access to medicines in rich and poor countries alike. Australia’s approach to providing direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) suggests that, under certain conditions, innovative approaches to payment can remove price as a barrier to access. In Australia, medicines on the national formulary are largely paid for by the government. In 2015, the authorities negotiated an agreement to spend approximately 1 billion Australian dollars (U.S.$766 million) over 5 years in exchange for an unlimited volume of DAAs for HCV from suppliers. This approach has been called the “subscription” or “Netflix” model, and the state of Louisiana announced in January 2019 that it was pursuing a similar approach for HCV. The Australian agreement is confidential, though the basic information above has been publicly reported..
Read more: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1813728?query=TOC 

New England Journal of Medicine
Brazil’s strategy for addressing hepatitis C, which combines evidence-based treatment protocols and innovative initiatives for local production of generic direct-acting antiviral drugs, needs to be considered in light of ongoing conflicts over pharmaceutical patents.
Payment may be required to view article. 

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Cirrhosis: What Clinicians Need to Know

Cirrhosis: What Clinicians Need to Know
Listen to Christine Kerr, MD, AAHIVS, of Hudson River HealthCare, discuss specific challenges in managing cirrhosis in an easy to access webinar using a case-based patient scenario, provided by HepCure.

Although; Cirrhosis: What Clinicians Need to Know, is intended for physicians and health care professionals, anyone, especially patients will benefit from watching the presentation.


Learning Objectives
1. Describe cirrhosis.
2. Discuss screening guidelines and diagnostic algorithms for cirrhosis.
3. Review cirrhosis treatment best practices.
Begin here....

View All Presentations At HepCure
Webinar Archive 

Christine Kerr, MD, AAHIVS, is the medical director for the HIV and Hepatitis Programs for Hudson River HealthCare. She trained in internal medicine at Brown University and Infectious Disease at Harvard. She is the community co-chair for the New York State Hepatitis C Elimination Task force, the co-chair of the NYS AIDS institute Quality Advisory committee and is co-chair for the NYS AIDS Institute/Johns Hopkins Guidelines Committee for Treatment of Hepatitis C in the Primary Care Setting. Her areas of interest include treatment of HIV and Hepatitis C in the community setting, care of the underserved, and program development and evaluation.

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Eating lots of meat tied to higher risk of liver disease

Reuters• February 12, 2019
By Lisa Rapaport
(Reuters Health) - People who eat a lot of animal protein may be more likely to have excessive fat in their livers and a higher risk of liver disease than individuals whose main source of protein is vegetables, a Dutch study suggests.

Researchers focused on what's known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is usually associated with obesity and certain eating habits. While dietary changes are recommended to treat this type of liver disease, research to date hasn't clearly demonstrated whether these changes can work for prevention.

Read more: 
https://news.yahoo.com/eating-lots-meat-tied-higher-risk-liver-disease-231806194.html

Study:
Association of dietary macronutrient composition and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in an ageing population: the Rotterdam Study