Thursday, October 25, 2018

Cirius Therapeutics Reports On Phase 2b Trial in NASH Patients with Fibrosis

Cirius Therapeutics Reports Positive Data for MSDC-0602K in Interim Analysis of Phase 2b Clinical Trial in NASH Patients with Fibrosis

- Interim analysis showed statistically significant reductions in liver enzymes, including ALT and AST, measured from baseline at six months

- In two highest dose groups, at least 50% of patients with high baseline ALT or AST improved to normal range at six months

- Statistically significant reductions in HbA1c and other measures of glycemic control and insulin resistance were observed

- Overall adverse event rate was similar across placebo and all doses of MSDC-0602K

- Largest Phase2b clinical trial including paired biopsies conducted in NASH; biopsy data after 12 months of treatment expected to be reported in the second half of 2019

SAN DIEGO and KALAMAZOO, Mich., Oct. 25, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- Cirius Therapeutics today announced positive results from an interim analysis of exploratory endpoints from its ongoing, fully enrolled Phase 2b clinical trial (the EMMINENCE trial) evaluating MSDC-0602K in 402 patients diagnosed with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with fibrosis. The interim analysis, which was conducted in the first 328 patients to reach their six-month follow-up visit, showed that patients treated with MSDC-0602K had significant improvements from baseline in measures of liver function and insulin resistance at six months. MSDC-0602K, a second-generation insulin sensitizer, is designed to selectively modulate the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC), which at the cellular level mediates the effects of overnutrition, a major cause of NASH and other metabolic disorders.

The subjects included in this interim analysis had significant liver disease, as established by liver biopsy, with an average non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score at baseline of 5.3. Almost sixty percent of these subjects had a baseline fibrosis score of 2 or 3 and approximately fifty percent also had a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes at baseline. Overall, baseline characteristics were well-balanced across treatment groups.

Key findings from the interim analysis include improvements in liver enzymes, with placebo-corrected reductions at 6 months of 14.3 U/L (p<0.001) and 7.9 U/L (p=0.012) in ALT and AST, respectively, in the 125mg cohort, and 10.6 U/L (p=0.004) and 4.0 (NS) in ALT and AST, respectively, in the 250mg cohort. Placebo-corrected reductions, relative to baseline, were 25% and 18% in ALT and AST, respectively, in the 125mg cohort, and 19% and 9% in ALT and AST, respectively, in the 250mg cohort. Importantly, normalization of hepatic enzymes was observed across all three dose levels of MSDC-0602K. 


Percentage of patients with high baseline values who returned to normal range
Placebo
62.5mg
125mg
250mg
ALT
15%
29%
60%
56%
AST
20%
36%
50%
52%
*ALT normal range defined as 6-34 U/L and 6-43 U/L for women and men, respectively; AST normal range defined as 9-34 U/L and 11-36 U/L for women and men, respectively) 

"We believe these interim results around improved measures of liver function and glycemic control, together with the preliminary adverse event profile, support MSDC-0602K's potential to be used in the treatment of NASH with fibrosis, including for those patients with Type 2 diabetes, a group which represents approximately 50% of patients with NASH," said Cirius' chief medical officer Howard Dittrich, M.D. "These results support the view that therapies directed toward the MPC have the potential to achieve insulin sensitizing pharmacology with an improved profile over first generation insulin sensitizers. We look forward to presenting full data to the scientific community." 

In addition to the improvement in ALT and AST, observations included significant improvement at six months in fasting glucose, HbA1c, insulin levels and HOMA-IR at the 125mg and 250mg dose levels.  Significant improvement in HbA1c was also observed in subjects with a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes in the 125mg and 250mg cohorts.  

In this interim analysis, the overall rate of treatment emergent adverse events was similar across placebo and all MSDC-0602K cohorts. There was a higher rate of treatment emergent adverse events reported in the 250mg dose compared to placebo in the musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders category. Within this category, arthralgia and back pain were the most frequently reported individual adverse events across the pooled 328 subjects. A modest dose-dependent increase in body weight was seen in MSDC-0602K treated subjects, a finding seen with insulin and with other therapies that seek to improve insulin resistance. The rate of peripheral edema observed at six months was similar to that observed at baseline and was comparable across placebo and all MSDC-0602K cohorts. 

"The interim results from the EMMINENCE trial, the largest Phase 2b clinical trial to include paired biopsies ever conducted in NASH, are compelling," said Stephen Harrison, M.D., the principal investigator in the EMMINENCE trial. "The improvements in hepatic enzymes observed to date are impressive, especially when combined with the meaningful improvements in glycemic control." 

About the EMMINENCE Trial
The EMMINENCE trial is a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating three oral dose levels of MSDC-0602K. Endpoints of the clinical trial include hepatic histological changes measured by biopsy after 12 months of treatment, changes in liver and metabolic function measured by the liver enzymes ALT and AST, markers of liver fibrosis, glycemic control and safety and tolerability. Not all of these endpoints were examined in this interim analysis; rather, in addition to the safety variables of incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and  peripheral edema grades, changes from baseline relative to placebo for a number of endpoints, including liver functions tests such as ALT and AST, among others, biomarkers and indirect measures of apoptosis and fibrosis, circulating inflammatory markers and markers of bone metabolism, serum triglycerides and fasting cholesterol, markers of insulin sensitivity, and blood pressure, were examined in an exploratory manner. 

About Cirius Therapeutics
Cirius is a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative therapies for the treatment of liver and metabolic diseases. Our lead product candidate, MSDC- 0602K, is a novel small molecule being developed as a once-daily oral therapy to treat NASH with fibrosis. MSDC-0602K is designed to selectively modulate the MPC, which mediates at the cellular level the effects of overnutrition, a major cause of NASH and other metabolic disorders. We are conducting a Phase 2b clinical trial of MSDC-0602K, which we have fully enrolled with 402 patients diagnosed with NASH with fibrosis. We expect to report final data from this clinical trial in the second half of 2019.

Curing hepatitis C reduces the risk of cardiovascular events

Liz Highleyman
Published: 25 October 2018
Several studies have found that people with hepatitis C are more prone to developing cardiovascular conditions such as coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, myocardial infarction and stroke; however, other studies have not seen this association.

A growing body of evidence shows that HCV treatment can help reverse this increased risk. A recent study from France, for example, found that curing hepatitis C reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in people with compensated cirrhosis. But again, some large studies from the interferon era did not see a similar benefit. 

On This Blog
A collection of current research articles on ailments related to HCV
Article directory on the extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C.

The following study investigated the prevalence of early signs of cardiovascular damage in patients with HCV cirrhosis. Is such damage reversible following treatment with DAAs? 

Full-text article available online @ Medscape, or purchase article, here

A Prospective Study
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Oct;48(7):740-749. doi: 10.1111/apt.14934. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

Subclinical cardiovascular damage in patients with HCV cirrhosis before and after treatment with direct antiviral agents: a prospective study.
Novo G1, Macaione F1, Giannitrapani L2, Minissale MG2, Bonomo V1, Indovina F1, Petta S3, Soresi M2, Montalto G2, Novo S1, Craxi A3, Licata A2,3.

Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Cirrhosis is associated with morpho-functional cardiovascular alterations.

AIMS: 
To detect early features of cardiovascular damage in HCV-compensated cirrhotic patients using myocardial deformation indices and carotid arterial stiffness, and, further, to evaluate their short-term behaviour after HCV eradication with direct antiviral agents (DAAs).

METHODS: 
Thirty-nine consecutive patients with HCV cirrhosis, without previous cardiovascular events, were studied and matched for age, gender and cardiovascular risk factors to 39 controls without liver or cardiovascular disease. Patients and controls underwent a baseline echocardiographic evaluation including global longitudinal strain and ultrasound scan of carotid arteries. HCV-cirrhotics were reassessed by echocardiography and carotid ultrasound after obtaining sustained virological response (SVR) on DAAs.

RESULTS: 
HCV-cirrhotics showed at baseline a significantly reduced global longitudinal strain compared to controls -18.1 (16.3-20.5) vs -21.2 (20.4-22.3), P < 0.001. They also had a significantly higher pulse wave velocity 8.6 (7.7-9.1) m/s vs 6.6 (6.0-7.1) m/s, P = 0.0001, and β-stiffness index 12.4 (11.1-13.5) vs 8.6 (8.0-9.2) P = 0.0001. At multiple regression analysis, diabetes and HCV cirrhosis were independent predictors of global longitudinal strain. All HCV-cirrhotic patients had SVR on DAAs. Follow-up available in 32 of 39 (82%) at 9 (8-10) months showed a significant improvement of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (P = 0.01) and lateral E' velocity compared to baseline (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: 
HCV-cirrhotics show a significant rate of subclinical cardiac and vascular abnormalities. At a time when their survival is less linked to progression of liver disease, due to viral eradication on DAAs, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality may take a significant role.
Continue to full-text: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/902665
free registration required

Wednesday, October 24, 2018

'The food supplement that ruined my liver'

BBC
'The food supplement that ruined my liver'
Tristan Quinn
It should have been one of the happiest days of his life. But Jim McCants looks back on his youngest son's high school graduation with mixed emotions. As he sat down next to his wife Cathleen in the university auditorium, just outside Dallas, Texas, she turned to look at him.

"She said 'Do you feel OK?'" Jim recalls. "I said, 'Yeah I feel fine, why?' 'Your face is yellow, your eyes are yellow, you look terrible.' When I looked in the mirror it was shocking."
Read More: https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-45971416

On This Blog
Current articles investigating herbal and dietary supplement-induced liver injury 

New drug to treat the flu - Roche announces FDA approval of Xofluza

In The Media
US approves first new type of flu drug in 2 decades
Associated Press · 38 mins ago

Press Release
Roche announces FDA approval of Xofluza (baloxavir marboxil) for influenza 

• First and only single-dose oral medicine approved to treat the flu  
• Xofluza significantly reduced the duration of flu symptoms compared to placebo  
• First novel proposed mechanism of action to treat the flu in nearly 20 years

Basel, 24 October 2018 - Roche (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) today announced that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Xofluza ™ (baloxavir marboxil) for the treatment of acute, uncomplicated influenza, or flu, in people 12 years of age and older. Xofluza is a first-in-class, single-dose oral medicine with a novel proposed mechanism of action that inhibits polymerase acidic endonuclease, an enzyme essential for viral replication.[1-2] Xofluza has demonstrated efficacy against a wide range of influenza viruses, including oseltamivir-resistant strains and avian strains (H7N9, H5N1) in non-clinical studies.[3-5]

“Xofluza is the first new flu medicine with a novel proposed mechanism of action approved in nearly 20 years, and we’re excited to offer a convenient treatment option that reduces flu symptoms by more than a day with a single oral dose,” said Sandra Horning, MD, Roche’s Chief Medical Officer and Head of Global Product Development. “If patients see their doctors within 48 hours of symptom onset, one dose of Xofluza can significantly reduce the duration of flu symptoms.”

The flu is one of the most common, yet serious, infectious diseases, representing a significant threat to public health. Globally, annual epidemics result in 3 to 5 million cases of severe disease, millions of hospitalisations and up to 650,000 deaths worldwide. [6-9] 

Xofluza was approved based on results from the phase III CAPSTONE-1 study of a single-dose of Xofluza compared with placebo or oseltamivir 75 mg, twice daily for five days, in otherwise healthy people with the flu, as well as results from a placebo-controlled phase II study in otherwise healthy people with the flu. Xofluza significantly reduced the duration of flu symptoms compared to placebo, and demonstrated similar efficacy compared to oseltamivir.[10] In clinical trials, Xofluza was safe and well-tolerated with a side effect profile similar to placebo. The CAPSTONE-1 and phase II study results were recently published in the 6 September 2018 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.[10] 

Continue reading:

On This Blog

Organic Food's Dubious Cancer Benefits


Organic Food's Dubious Cancer Benefits
Hi folks, today Medscape launched both a video & article by F. Perry Wilson, MD, MSCE, reviewing the following study: Association of Frequency of Organic Food Consumption With Cancer Risk - Findings From the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort Study, investigating the association between organic food consumption and the risk of cancer, published this week in JAMA Internal Medicine.

Check it out:
Organic Food's Dubious Cancer Benefits
Today we are looking at an observational study that shows that people who eat lots of organic food have slightly lower rates of cancer than people who don't eat lots of organic food...
Look, organic food is a luxury good. And luxury goods are associated with a survival benefit because rich people live longer. Is it fair? No. But it's true. 
Free registration may be required to view article. 

Yesterday, UK's NHS website published this analysis nicely summing up both media coverage and the research article:

Eating organic food linked with lower cancer risk
"Organic food lowers blood and breast cancer risk, study finds," the Mail Online reports.

The news website reports on a large study in France that questioned 69,000 people on their consumption of organic food, and then monitored them for 5 years to see how many developed cancer.

Organic food is grown without the use of pesticides, manmade fertilisers or genetic modification (GM) techniques. Organic meat, poultry, eggs and dairy products come from animals that are given no antibiotics or growth hormones.

Researchers found that people who ate the most organic food had a 24% reduced risk of cancer compared to those who ate the least.

Despite the encouraging media reports, this study does not prove that eating organic food will protect you against cancer.

The study does not demonstrate that organic food is the direct cause of the reduced risk. People who ate more organic food had healthier lifestyles in general, doing more exercise and eating more fruit and vegetables than other people. Though the researchers tried to adjust for such health and lifestyle factors, it's still possible these things had an influence.

So, claims that "eating organic food will reduce cancer rates" remain unproven. It would be better to focus on eating a healthy diet high in fruit, vegetables and fibre and low in processed meat, and to maintain a healthy weight. Eating well, along with taking regular exercise and not smoking, can significantly reduce your risk of developing cancer. 

Where does the study come from? 
The research was conducted by the Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, and Universit é Paris 13. Funding was provided by several French organisations including the Ministry of Health, Institute for Health Surveillance, and the National Institute for Prevention and Health Education.

One of the researchers declared that they had an advisory role promoting the use of organic products to 2 non-profit organisations.

The study was published in the peer-reviewed medical journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

The UK media took the findings at face value without acknowledging other factors that could have potentially influenced the results, and the small number of cancer cases recorded. For example, the Mail's statement that: "The biggest impact was seen on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma risk [a cancer of the lymphatic system], which plummeted among those who shunned chemical-sprayed food" is certainly overblown, given that this was based on tiny numbers and could be a chance finding.

But to their credit, the UK media did point out that people who eat organic food tend to have a healthier lifestyle than people who don't. 

What kind of research was this?
This was a population-based cohort study that aimed to see whether eating organic food was associated with risk of developing cancer.

The organic food market avoids the use of chemical fertilisers, pesticides and GM methods, and restricts the use of medications in animals.

Previous research has demonstrated other potential beneficial effects of eating an organic diet, such as a lowered level of pesticides in urine samples. But few studies have looked at the potential link with cancer.

Observational studies such as this are useful for exploring potential links but can't prove cause and effect, as other health and lifestyle factors could be having an influence. 

What did the researchers do?
This study involved 68,946 participants (78% women, average age 44 years) of the internet-based French cohort study, NutriNet-Sante. The cohort was set up in 2009 to look at links between diet, nutrition and health.

At the start of the study, participants provided information on their sociodemographic status, body measurements, health status and lifestyle behaviours. 

They were asked 2 months later how often they ate 16 different organic products, including fruit and vegetables, dairy and eggs, meat and fish, grains and cereals, ready meals, wine, chocolate and coffee. 
They were asked to tick 1 of the following:
most of the time
occasionally
never ("too expensive")
never ("product not available")
never ("I'm not interested in organic products")
never ("I avoid such products")
never ("for no specific reason")
I don't know

For each product, 2 points for were given for "most of the time", 1 point for "occasionally" and 0 for all other responses. The 16 items therefore had a total organic food score ranging from 0 to 32 points. The analysis was split into 4 quartiles, from lowest to highest intake.

Health outcomes of participants were recorded for an average of 4.5 years. This information was gathered through annual questionnaires. If participants reported receiving a diagnosis of cancer, they were asked for medical records (obtained for 90%) and details of the treating doctor or hospital.

The fully adjusted analysis took account of the following potential confounders:
age and gender
marital status
education, occupational status and monthly income
smoking and alcohol intake
body mass index
physical activity
overall food energy intake and intake of fibre, fruit and vegetables, processed foods and red meat
hormonal factors in women, such as use of hormone treatment and whether they'd been through the menopause 

What were the basic results?
In total, 1,340 cancers developed among the 68,946 participants (2% of the cohort). These included breast cancer (34%), prostate cancer (13%), skin cancer (10%) and bowel cancer (7%).

Consumption of organic food was more common among:
women
those with a higher education or occupational status
those who did more physical activity and who had healthier diets in general

Those who ate the most organic food had a 24% lower risk of developing cancer compared to those with the lowest intake (hazard ratio (HR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 0.90).

There were no differences in people who ate moderate amounts of organic food compared with those who ate the least.

By specific cancer, significant links with organic food intake were only found for:
postmenopausal breast cancer
lymphomas overall
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma specifically

However, these results should be taken with caution, particularly because of the very low number of cases. 

What do the researchers conclude?
The researchers conclude: "A higher frequency of organic food consumption was associated with a reduced risk of cancer. Although the study findings need to be confirmed, promoting organic food consumption in the general population could be a promising preventive strategy against cancer." 

Conclusions
This study is a valuable investigation into potential links between eating organic food and cancer risk. However, the author's conclusion could be a little premature. This study alone cannot prove that eating organic food will prevent you getting cancer.

There are a few points to note.

Cancers still developed among people who ate the most organic food – it's just there were fewer cases (269 vs 360 among those eating the least amount of organic food). So even if there is a direct link, eating organic food is not guaranteed protection against cancer.

The conclusions about the links with specific cancers were based on tiny numbers – for example, 15 non-Hodgkin's lymphomas among those eating the least organic food vs 2 among those eating the most organic.

Organic food intake was taken at a single point in time and self-reported. This may be inaccurate and not reflect lifetime habits.

There was a notable difference in sociodemographics and lifestyles of those eating the most organic food. The researchers tried to adjust for these factors, but there's still a chance these things influenced the results. This means the study can't prove that eating organic food is responsible for the reduced risk – it could just be down to living a healthier lifestyle in general.

The study benefits from a large sample size, but these were online volunteers to a health and nutrition study who may not represent the general population of France.

Experts have added similar notes of caution. For example, Professor Tom Sanders of King's College London says: "[The authors'] conclusion, that promoting organic food in the general population could be a promising cancer preventive strategy, is overblown."

It's understandable to want to eat organic food for health or environmental reasons. But in terms of protecting against cancer, what's far more proven to have an effect is a healthier diet in general with a high amount of fruit and vegetables and fibre and low amount of processed meat, along with regular physical activity, and maintaining a healthy weight. 

Links to the headlines 
Mail Online, October 22 2018 
The Sun, October 23 2018 
The Times (subscription required), October 23 2018

Links to the science
Baudry J, Assmann KE, Touvier M, et al. 
JAMA Internal Medicine. Published online October 22 2018

Analysis by Bazian
Edited by NHS Website

Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Making The Opioid Use Disorder Cascade Of Care A Reality, Despite Data Limitations

“Making The Opioid Use Disorder Cascade Of Care A Reality, Despite Data Limitations, " Health Affairs Blog
October 23, 2018. 
DOI: 10.1377/hblog20181018.540807

Recent discussion on the Health Affairs Blog has described both the development of a cascade of care model and corresponding quality measures to assess addiction treatment system performance, as well as the collection of data needed to implement the cascade of care. In this follow up, we offer an approach that combines administrative data sets and provides a starting point for the nation and individual states to measure progress and barriers to success in addressing the opioid epidemic. Despite imperfect data collection and reporting systems, we are past due for an honest attempt to create baseline measures of opioid use disorder management from which to improve. We propose a method to develop baseline calculations that uses approved Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures and national survey and administrative claims data organized into a cascade of care.

Monday, October 22, 2018

Hepatitis C Virus in Women of Childbearing Age, Pregnant Women, and Children

Of Interest
Recent increases in hepatitis C among women of child-bearing age have led public health advocates to call for universal HCV screening in all pregnant women, regardless of reported risk factors. Read our new fact sheet for an overview of the reasons why HCV screening should be expanded. 
View and download the fact sheet here.

The American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):633-641. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.029.
Hepatitis C Virus in Women of Childbearing Age, Pregnant Women, and Children.
Schillie SF1, Canary L2, Koneru A2, Nelson NP2, Tanico W3, Kaufman HW4, Hariri S2, Vellozzi CJ2.
Full-text article online:
https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(18)31945-7/fulltext
Download PDF
https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(18)31945-7/pdf

This study identified trends in hepatitis C virus testing and positivity in women of childbearing age, pregnant women, and children aged less than 5 years. Among women who delivered live births in 2015, hepatitis C virus–infected women were more likely to be aged 20–29 years, white, non-Hispanic, covered by Medicaid, and living in rural areas. From 2011 to 2016, hepatitis C virus testing increased by 39% among women of childbearing age, 135% in pregnant women, and 25% among children. Hepatitis C virus positivity increased by 36% among women of childbearing age, 39% in pregnant women, and 13% among children. 

Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Perinatal transmission is an increasingly important mode of hepatitis C virus transmission. The authors characterized U.S. births among hepatitis C virus-infected women and evaluated trends in hepatitis C virus testing and positivity in women of childbearing age, pregnant women, and children aged less than 5years.

METHODS:
In 2017, National Center for Health Statistics birth certificate data (48 states and District of Columbia) were analyzed to assess the number of hepatitis C virus-infected women delivering live births in 2015, and commercial laboratory data were analyzed to assess hepatitis C virus testing and positivity among women of childbearing age, pregnant women, and children aged <5years from 2011 to 2016.

RESULTS:
In 2015, a total of 0.38% (n=14,417) of live births were delivered by hepatitis C virus-infected women. Births delivered by hepatitis C virus-infected women, compared with births overall, occurred more often in women who were aged 20-29years (60.7% vs 50.9%); white, non-Hispanic (80.2% vs 52.8%); covered by Medicaid or other government insurance (79.2% vs 43.9%); and had rural residence (26.0% vs 14.0%). From 2011 to 2016 laboratory data, among women of childbearing age, hepatitis C virus testing increased by 39%, from 6.1% to 8.4%, and positivity increased by 36%, from 4.4% to 6.0%. Among pregnant women, hepatitis C virus testing increased by 135%, from 5.7% to 13.4%, and positivity increased by 39%, from 2.6% to 3.6%. Among children, hepatitis C virus testing increased by 25%, from 0.47% to 0.59%, and positivity increased by 13%, from 3.6% to 4.0%.

CONCLUSIONS:
The potential for perinatal hepatitis C virus transmission exists. Expanded hepatitis C virus testing guidelines may address the burden of disease in this population.

Saturday, October 20, 2018

Weekend Update: Hepatitis C Prior Authorization: Tricks of the Trade

HCV Education 
Listen to experts discuss important HCV related topics in the following easy to access webinar programs presented by HepCure.

Listen
On Tuesday, October 9th, Susan Lee, PharmD BCPS CDE of Northwell Health, presented on:
Hepatitis C Prior Authorization: Tricks of the Trade
Topics
1. Discuss tests needed to apply for Hepatitis C (HCV) therapy prior authorization.
2. Identify essential resources for patients approved for treatment.
3. Describe options for patients denied HCV therapy
Begin here.....

SAVE THE DATE
October 23, 2018
UPCOMING: Hepatitis C Anti-Viral Therapy Guidance Review 2018

In The News

HepCBC is a non-profit organization run by and for people infected and affected by viral hepatitis. Our mission is to provide education, prevention and support to those living with viral hepatitis.
Weekly Review: read the latest issue of the Weekly Bull.

MedPage Today
AGA Reading Room
10.18.2018
Hep C Rates High Among People with Mental Health Disorders
With the advent of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, the possibility of eradicating hepatitis C virus (HCV) is real; however, HCV treatment needs to be broadly available and utilized. The prevalence of HCV is likely high among individuals with mental health disorders who may also suffer from substance use disorders. Partnerships between mental health providers and clinicians treating HCV could potentially increase access to DAA therapy and improve overall care. If underlying mental health disorders are not addressed, the risks of nonadherence to DAA therapy or re-infection with HCV are greater. Additionally, mental health providers should recognize the increased risk for HCV in their patient population and have the tools needed to link them to care. More research is needed to understand the optimal care delivery approaches for patients with both mental health disorders and HCV.
Begin here.....

Top Story From Healio
Healio features the industry’s best news reporting, dynamic multimedia, question-and-answer columns, educational activities in a variety of formats, blogs, and peer-reviewed journals.
October 20, 2018
This year at the American College of Gastroenterology Annual Meeting, several hepatology specialists discussed the changing landscape of liver disease health care, such as increasing rates of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease which is quickly becoming the number one indication for liver transplantation. Healio presents the following liver disease highlights from ACG 2018 including an improved liver biopsy attenuation technique, the risks and course of NAFLD depending on patient demographics, and liver disease in pregnant patients.

On Twitter - @HenryEChang
Hepatitis C Virus
Improving #hepatitis C direct-acting antiviral access & uptake: a role for patient-reported outcomes & lived-experience→https://jmp.sh/Ejs7cuS

Hepatitis B Virus On-treatment improvement of MELD score reduces death & hepatic events in patients with #hepatitis B-related #cirrhosishttps://jmp.sh/cCxYoaD

Enjoy the weekend.
Tina