Saturday, July 5, 2014

Dietary Supplements—A Poorly Regulated Danger


Dietary Supplements—A Poorly Regulated Danger 99740351Posted in: Nutrition

In a CNN Opinion piece, David S. Seres, MD, emphasizes the need for scientific evaluation of dietary supplements. In addition to vitamins and herbs, says Dr. Seres, supplements can include hormones and other pharmacologically active ingredients that can alter the efficacy and safety of medications and affect the body’s physiologic functions.

This year marks the 20th anniversary of the passage of one of the most skillful pieces of legislation ever to undermine the health of Americans: The Dietary Supplement Health and Educational Act of 1994. The result was to remove from regulation by the Food and Drug Administration any substances labeled as a dietary supplement.
Supplement companies claim that FDA regulation would unfairly deprive the public of access to potentially beneficial substances. Dr. Seres says the companies cite inappropriate data to support their claims and dismiss any evidence to the contrary. Yet most people—scientists and nonscientists alike—are unaware of the weaknesses in the scientific data on supplements.

It is time, says Dr. Seres, to reassess the regulation of dietary supplements, consider our priorities in how funding is granted for nutrition research, reeducate nutrition experts as well as the public, and be honest about our inability to offer definitive, safe, and effective nutritional recommendations.

Dr. Seres is an associate professor of medicine at the Institute of Human Nutrition at Columbia University Medical Center. He is also a Public Voice Fellow with the Op-Ed Project.

Read the full CNN Opinion piece here.

Of Interest:
Linking Herbal Supplements with Liver Injury
FDA UPDATE - Sometimes Drugs and the Liver Don't Mix

Friday, July 4, 2014

Study Begins To Define How Long HCV Patients May Need Treatment


Study Begins To Define How Long HCV Patients May Need Treatment

As new treatments for hepatitis C virus are approved, Andrew H. Talal, MD, is exploring their mechanisms and revealing how the virus responds. 

Groundbreaking Study Tracks Viral Decay in Patients with Hepatitis C
June 24, 2014

A study led by Andrew H. Talal, MD, is the first to trace in real time how the drug telaprevir inhibits viral replication in the liver and  clears hepatitis C virus (HCV) from the cells and plasma of infected patients.

“Our findings begin to define for how long patients may need to be treated in order to achieve viral eradication,” says Talal, professor of medicine in the Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition.

“Until now, there has been no precise definition of the duration of treatment based upon serial measurements of the virus in the liver,” he explains. “This is the first time such measurements have been performed during antiviral therapy.”

Treating Chronic HCV Infection With Protease Inhibitor
The study, conducted at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City, involved 15 patients with chronic HCV infection who were treated with telaprevir-based triple therapy.

The researchers sampled their livers at various intervals before and after treatment. They measured viral kinetics, resistance patterns, drug concentrations and host transcription profiles. 
The triple therapy is an HCV treatment regimen approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2011.

RNA Decay in Liver Lags Behind That in Blood
Findings regarding the rate of decay for viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) — an indicator of how quickly the virus is being eradicated — are of particular interest.

“We found that HCV RNA decay in the liver lagged behind that in the peripheral blood, which has implications for how long the virus may persist in the body and the possible duration of treatment needed,” Talal says.

Researchers also found higher levels of telaprevir in blood than in the liver.

“These findings can affect the duration of therapy,” said Talal, adding that they can also help identify when drug-resistant variants of the virus emerge in the blood and liver.

The findings also may have relevance for the development of other methods of treating HCV, such as vaccines to control the infection, he adds.

Fine-Needle Aspiration Allows Repeat Sampling
Talal and his team used fine-needle aspiration to sample the livers and blood of patients in the study.

Compared to more invasive core needle biopsy used in previous studies, this technique is better tolerated by patients and allows for repeated sampling at more time points.

“Fine-needle aspiration enables us to sample the liver repeatedly during the course of treatment to better understand what’s happening with the virus, how these drugs work and how to tailor therapy to the patient,” says Talal.

Study Published in Hepatology
The study, Telaprevir-Based Treatment Effects on Hepatitis C Virus in Liver and Blood, has been published in Hepatology. Other UB co-authors are:
  • Rositsa B. Dimova, PhD, research assistant professor of medicine and biostatistics
  • Marija Zeremski, PhD, research assistant professor of medicine
Additional co-authors are from Weill Cornell, InnovaTID Pharmaceuticals and Vertex Pharmaceuticals.

Watch Webinar: Ageing with Chronic Hepatitis C

 

Webinar: Ageing with Chronic Hepatitis C 

Ageing with Chronic Hepatitis C

Presenters: Jacqui Richmond, Annie Madden, Ross Williams, Alexander Thompson

Updated By

Facilitator: Kevin Marriott

Canada's public drug plans ranked from best to worst

Canada's public drug plans ranked from best to worst

Good afternoon folks, our friends in Canada may be interested in new data; Comparing Access to New Drugs in Canada's Federal and Provincial Public Drug Plans, released by the Canadian Health Policy Institute (CHPI).

The institute looked at how long patients must wait for new drugs to be funded by Canada's public drug programs, using information from Health Canada, and IMS Brogan spanning from January 1, 2004 to December 1, 2013.  Apparently, Quebec appeared to have the best access to new drugs, timely reimbursement, and best coverage rates. You may remember that Quebec was the first Canadian province to provide access to Sovaldi (June 2, 2014) for treatment-naïve patients with genotypes 1 and 4 regardless of liver severity. The authors write;

Researchers found that the quality of insured access to new drugs varies significantly between public drug plans. Some jurisdictions provide much better access for their publicly insured populations than do other jurisdictions.
Quebec and Ontario had the best coverage rates – publicly insuring the highest number of available new drugs, while Manitoba, Alberta, British Columbia and the federal NIHB had the lowest coverage rates for new drugs.

Press Release: 

Study ranks Canada's public drug plans from best to worst on access to new drugs: Canadian Health Policy Institute (CHPI)

July 3, 2014

New research published by the Canadian Health Policy Institute (CHPI) shows that Quebec's publicly funded drug plan provides the best access to new drugs among all the federal and provincial public drug plans in Canada.

The study compares Canada's public drug programs in terms of the number of new drugs approved for public insurance coverage, as well as the time that patients must wait for publicly insured access to new drugs. It ranks the quality of coverage for new drugs under federal and provincial public drug plans from best to worst.

The findings are relevant to the health of a large number of Canadians. It is roughly estimated that as of 2012, 11.3 million Canadians were eligible for coverage under public drug insurance programs.

The study uses the most recent data from Health Canada and IMS Brogan covering the period from January 1, 2004 to December 1, 2013.

Researchers found that the quality of insured access to new drugs varies significantly between public drug plans. Some jurisdictions provide much better access for their publicly insured populations than do other jurisdictions.

Quebec and Ontario had the best coverage rates – publicly insuring the highest number of available new drugs, while Manitoba, Alberta, British Columbia and the federal NIHB had the lowest coverage rates for new drugs.

Quebec had the shortest delays to listing new drugs for reimbursement on its public drug plan, while New Brunswick, PEI and Ontario had the longest delays to listing.

New Brunswick and Quebec had the highest number of new drugs listed for full reimbursement, while Manitoba, British Columbia, the NIHB, Ontario and Saskatchewan had the lowest number of full reimbursements.

Overall, Quebec appears to provide the best access to new drugs under its public drug plan. However, it is important to put the performance of all public drug plans in the context of benchmarks set by private sector insurance plans. Other CHPI research confirms that all public drug plans in Canada provide much lower quality of coverage for new drugs than do private sector drug insurance plans.

The study, Comparing Access to New Drugs in Canada's Federal and Provincial Public Drug Plans, is part of an annual series of papers released under the title: How Good Is Your Drug Insurance? It was published at CHPI's free access online journal, Canadian Health Policy and can be downloaded here.

Canadian Health Policy Institute
www.canadianhealthpolicy.com

Incidence and Management of Rash in Telaprevir-Treated Patients: Lessons for Simeprevir?

Incidence and Management of Rash in Telaprevir-Treated Patients: Lessons for Simeprevir? 

Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Jun 17. pii: 1060028014539274. [Epub ahead of print]

Smith MA1, Johnson HJ2, Chopra KB2, Dunn MA2, Ulrich AM2, Mohammad RA3. Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Jun 17. pii: 1060028014539274. [Epub ahead of print]

Author information
1University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA,  2 University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA University of Michigan Health System, University Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Telaprevir-induced rash is a common, therapy-limiting adverse drug event (ADE) for patients with hepatitis c virus (HCV) infection. Given the similarity between telaprevir and simeprevir, real-world management of rash during treatment with an NS3/4A protease inhibitor and its implications are important.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the incidence of rash in telaprevir-treated patients, its management, and the impact on sustained virological response and to identify any risk factors for rash development.

METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients who were treated with telaprevir in a hepatology clinic from July 1, 2011, to August 31, 2012.  Pertinent information on demographics, past medical history, medications, laboratory data, outcomes of rash, other adverse drug events (ADEs) related to treatment, and physician grading of rash were collected.

RESULTS: Of 159 patients included, 44% (70/159) developed rash, and 4% (7/159) discontinued therapy because of rash. Median number of days until rash did not differ between patients who continued and discontinued therapy (25 vs 45, respectively; P = 0.88).

Patients who developed rash were more likely to have lower actual body weight (ABW) or body mass index (BMI; P ≤ 0.01). No significant difference in rash development when drug-allergy history was considered was found. Most patients who continued telaprevir were prescribed topical corticosteroids (93.7%) and cetirizine (41.3%).

Patients who discontinued therapy were more likely to be evaluated by dermatology (P = 0.002), prescribed oral corticosteroids (P = 0.02), hydroxyzine (P = 0.001), and topical triamcinolone (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Actual body weight (ABW) and body mass index (BMI) appear to be related to rash development. This finding may have implications in the treatment of HCV with simeprevir, given its similarity to telaprevir.

Full Text Source
HighWire - PDF

Thursday, July 3, 2014

Merck, Gilead Lead Race To Eradicate Hepatitis C

Investment Commentary
By

Merck, Gilead Lead Race To Eradicate Hepatitis C 

Even if you're not a biotech or pharma investor, you've probably caught an earful of news lately about the virus called hepatitis C.

From last December's record-breaking launch of Gilead Sciences' wonder drug Sovaldi to the controversies about its $84,000 price tag to Merck 's  recent $3.85 billion buyout of formerly neglected biotech Idenix Pharmaceuticals, hepatitis C has provided a constant supply of headlines this year. But all this page-by-page horse-race news may have clouded the big picture, so here is a quick overview for investors.

The Market

No one is sure exactly how many people might be infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Transmitted by blood-to-blood contact -- usually from unclean needles or unscreened donated blood -- the virus can sit in the body for years without provoking apparent symptoms. As a result, many people don't realize that they have it. But the virus can also cause a multitude of troubling symptoms and, if left untreated, can eventually cause scarring (cirrhosis) and sometimes cancer of the liver.

Despite the uncertainties, it is generally agreed that a huge number of people are infected. The World Health Organization estimates that about 3% of the planet's population -- about 170 million people -- has HCV. In the U.S., estimates range between 3 million and 4 million, with only about half that number diagnosed.

Because unclean needles are associated with drug addiction, substandard medical care and amateur tattoos, the poor and imprisoned make up a disproportionate amount of the infected. In a report prepared in December forJohnson & Johnson, the consulting firm Milliman estimated that about half of Americans with undiagnosed HCV are uninsured. That's not even counting the prison population, whose rate of infection is estimated by different sources at anywhere from 23% to 39%.

A significant number of this population is also infected with HIV. In the broader population, about a quarter of all HIV patients also have HCV, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

In the U.S., one's generation also makes a difference. People born in the 1950s, especially males, are far more likely to be infected with HCV than those born earlier or later. A couple of years ago, the CDC observed a looming HCV public health crisis, as the untreated baby boomers are about due to develop cirrhosis of the liver, which occurs in about 15% to 20% of all cases. This concern led the agency to recommend that everybody of that generation -- no matter how clean they think they are -- should get tested.

Another important factor affecting the HCV population: There are six different genotypes of the virus. In the U.S., about 73% of patients have genotype 1, 14% have genotype 2, and 8% have genotype 3. Other countries have different ratios; in Japan, genotype 2 is the most common.

The Drugs

Until 2011, the standard treatment for HCV was regular injections of interferon combined with a generic oral medicine called ribavirin. Interferon, a protein, is toxic and causes flu-like symptoms, which are especially misery-inducing when treatment lasts for six months to a year. Even then, at least 20% of people who were treated were not cured. As a result, people tended to put off treatment until they were desperate: only about 220,000 Americans have received this therapy.

With the rise of biotechnology, drugmakers started experimenting with new platforms. One popular class of target drugs is protease inhibitors. In the 1990s, they helped people with HIV to manage the disease rather than simply die.

The first two HCV protease inhibitors hit the U.S. market in May 2011: Merck's Victrelis andVertex Pharmaceuticals ' Incivek. The next one, J&J's Olysio, was approved in November. Under current labeling, all of these drugs still have to be taken with interferon, however.

Another class of drugs that have shown early promise are polymerase inhibitors. The most effective among them were nucleotide or nucleoside drugs, known in the industry as "nucs." Clinical trials conducted by several different companies showed their efficacy.

Their main drawback: safety. Probably the most spectacular nuc blowup came in August 2012, whenBristol-Myers Squibb stopped a phase-two trial of its nuc after a patient died of heart failure. The only first-generation nuc that survived unscathed was Gilead's sofosbuvir, which was later branded Sovaldi.

Sovaldi appears to represent a giant step forward in HCV treatment. The drug is taken orally, cures upward of 95% of patients in just 12 weeks and has few side effects. Even so, it isn't made to be a solo act. The FDA approved the drug but recommended that genotype 1 patients take it with interferon unless they're too sick to handle interferon. Many patients have been combining Sovaldi with Olysio instead. Gilead's larger goal is to combine the drug with an NS5a inhibitor, which can provide interferon-like treatment without the downside effects.

NS5a inhibitors have turned out to be the third major class of oral drugs that succeed against HCV. In a clinical trial reported last year, Bristol-Myers' NS5a inhibitor, daclatasvir, scored a 100% cure rate when combined with sofosbuvir for previously untreated genotype 1 patients.

But Gilead decided not to pursue that combo because it had its own NS5a, ledipasvir. The sofosbuvir-ledipasvir combo has scored outstandingly in trials and is conveniently co-formulated into one pill to be taken once daily. Gilead has filed for approval with both the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for genotype 1 patients. It is expected to launch in October.

The Drama

Gilead's combo is expected to have company. By December,AbbVie (ABBV) is expecting approval of its "3D" regimen. It combines all three types of drugs: a protease inhibitor (licensed fromEnanta Pharmaceuticals (ENTA), an NS5a inhibitor, and a non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor. It's all-oral, has a good safety profile and cures 96% of genotype 1 patients in 12 weeks. Analysts say that the regimen's only disadvantage is its inconvenience, since it involves multiple pills per day instead of just one.

But what investors will most look at is the price. It has huge implications for Gilead, which launched Sovaldi with a price tag of $1,000 a pill -- or $84,000 for 12 weeks of treatment. As noted above, the HCV-infected population is far from rich, so most of the objections to it have come from payers -- that is, insurers -- and their associates. Pharmacy benefit manager (or PBM) Express Scripts (ESRX) estimated in its annual Drug Trend report, issued in April, that spending on HCV treatment will double this year, then jump 200% in both 2015 and 2016. Consensus estimates have annual sales of Sovaldi alone passing $11 billion next year.

"Never before has a drug been priced this high to treat a patient population this large, and the resulting costs will be unsustainable for our country," Express Scripts Chief Medical Officer Steve Miller said in a statement at the time.

Express Scripts has made clear that it intends to play drugmakers against each other, but as ISI Group analyst Mark Schoenebaum pointed out, "this plan by the PBMs requires that the drug companies 'play ball.'" AbbVie has been tight-lipped about its pricing plan, leading to much speculation. Schoenebaum, for one, believes that it won't price much lower than Gilead but may offer discounts to hard-to-treat patients, such as those with advanced liver disease or HIV co-infection.

Bristol-Myers Squibb is also targeting the tough-to-treat populations, senior vice president Douglas Manion told IBD in March. Bristol has filed for approval of daclatasvir as a co-treatment with other drugs, including Sovaldi. It's also following AbbVie's roadmap by combining daclatasvir with a protease inhibitor and a non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor from its own labs.

Are HCV's Days Numbered?

Which brings us back to Merck's acquisition of Idenix last month. In April, Merck reported a 98% cure rate after 12 weeks with its own combo of a protease inhibitor and an NS5a inhibitor. Idenix, however, brings a rare pair of nucs that haven't (yet) run into safety trouble. Merck's goal, as stated in its presentation that day, was to develop a single daily pill that works across all genotypes in just four to six weeks, which is significantly faster than what this year's drugs are doing.

Idenix's drugs are still early in development, signaling that Merck believes the market will remain competitive for some time. In its presentation, the company said that the total HCV market should pass $20 billion in 2018, "driven by second-generation, all-oral, triple-therapy combinations." This claim seemed to counter some fears on the Street that, because the new HCV drugs appear able to cure nearly all patients, demand would ultimately prove short-lived.

"Consensus thinks HCV sales go bad in 2016 (HCV market demise), but we have said we believe long-term market is more sustainable," wrote RBC Capital Markets analyst Michael Yee in a June 9 note. But markets outside the U.S. present significant opportunity, Yee said, and Merck's deal suggests rational pricing for the drugs.

"Thus," Yee said, "we think the (market's) demise is greatly exaggerated."

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.

This article appears in: Investing , Investing Ideas

Read more: http://www.nasdaq.com/article/merck-gilead-lead-race-to-eradicate-hepatitis-c-cm367659#ixzz36ReOrRnv

Hepatitis C News; Australia New Zealand - TGA approves Gilead's Sovaldi®

Sovaldi® (Sofosbuvir) - a new treatment for chronic hepatitis C

[4th July, 2014] Gilead Sciences, Australia New Zealand, today announced that the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has approved Sovaldi® (sofosbuvir), a new direct acting antiviral treatment, for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection in adults as a component of a combination antiviral treatment regimen.

Sovaldi is a once-daily treatment that works across all genotypes of hepatitis C.1 It works by stopping part of the process the virus needs to go through in order to replicate itself and is used in combination with other therapies.1 Sovaldi has a treatment duration as short as 12 weeks and is well tolerated with few side effects.1, 2, 3

“Currently, chronic hepatitis C has a high diagnosis rate but a low treatment rate,” said Professor Gregory Dore, Head of the Viral Hepatitis Clinical Research Program, Kirby Institute. “Sofosbuvir is a major advance for hepatitis C treatment, enabling shorter treatment duration and less side effects. Its efficacy, lack of resistance, and once daily dosing, should place Sofosbuvir at the forefront of the new era of improved treatments for people living with hepatitis C,” he added.

“Sovaldi offers the opportunity to take hepatitis C from a life-threatening chronic disease to one that can be cured in more people,” said Rob Hetherington, General Manager Gilead, Australia and New Zealand. “We believe Sovaldi will change the way hepatitis C is treated in Australia and help reverse the growing burden of liver disease and rising death toll from associated diseases.”

CHC affects an estimated 230,000 people in Australia.4 CHC is the most common reason for liver transplantation in Australia and a leading cause of liver cancer.5, 6 It is estimated that the number of people with CHC developing advanced liver disease and dying from liver disease-related causes, including liver cancer, will increase dramatically over the coming decades if low treatment levels continue.7, 8, 9

In addition to life-threatening complications, CHC also affects a person’s social wellbeing, their ability to work, their relationships and their psychological health.10, 11 Curing them of their CHC infection will lift an enormous social and psychological burden, which will positively impact the individuals living with this disease, their partners and their family members. 7, 12

Sovaldi has been approved for use in chronic hepatitis C infection in adults as a component of a combination antiviral treatment regimen [Sovaldi is indicated for the treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection as a component of a combination antiviral treatment regimen].1 Sovaldi is approved in the United States, Canada, Europe and New Zealand.

About Sovaldi

Sovaldi is an oral nucleotide analog inhibitor of the HCV NS5B polymerase enzyme, which plays an essential role in HCV replication. Sovaldi is a direct-acting agent, meaning that it interferes directly with the HCV life cycle by suppressing viral replication. Treatment regimen and duration for Sovaldi are dependent on both viral genotype and patient population. Treatment response varies based on baseline host and viral factors. Monotherapy is not recommended for treatment of CHC.1

About the TGA Submission

The Therapeutic Goods Administration authorisation for Sovaldi is supported primarily by data from four Phase 3 studies, NEUTRINO, FISSION, POSITRON and FUSION in which 12 or 16 weeks of Sovaldi-based therapy was found to be superior or non-inferior compared with the currently available treatment options RBV/peg-IFN or historical controls, based on the proportion of patients who had a sustained virologic response (where HCV becomes undetectable) 12 weeks after completing therapy (SVR12).1 Patients who achieve SVR12 are considered cured of HCV.13 Trial participants taking Sovaldi-based therapy achieved SVR12 rates of up to 90 per cent.1 For full study details, see the Approved Product information provided.

In addition to the above, two Phase 3 studies VALENCE and PHOTON-1 were also evaluated by the TGA. In the VALENCE study, patients with genotype 3 HCV infection were treated with Sovaldi and RBV for 24 weeks. The PHOTON-1 study evaluated Sovaldi and RBV for 12 or 24 weeks in patients with genotype 1, 2 or 3 HCV infection co-infected with HIV-1.1

Sovaldi was well tolerated in clinical studies. Adverse events were generally mild and there were few treatment discontinuations due to adverse events. The most common adverse events occurring in at least 10 per cent of patients were consistent with the safety profiles of peg-IFN and RBV and included fatigue, headache, nausea, insomnia, pruritus (severe itching), anaemia and asthenia.1

About Gilead Sciences

Gilead Sciences is a biopharmaceutical company that discovers, develops and commercializes innovative therapeutics in areas of unmet medical need. The company's mission is to advance the care of patients suffering from life-threatening diseases worldwide. Headquartered in Foster City, California, Gilead has operations in North and South America, Europe and Asia Pacific.

Sovaldi is a registered trademark of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.


SOURCE

Treating Hepatitis C in Patients With a Diagnosis of Schizophrenia

Journal of Viral Hepatitis

The Efficacy and Safety of Treating Hepatitis C in Patients With a Diagnosis of Schizophrenia
What special considerations should be taken into account in the treatment of patients with hepatitis C who also have been diagnosed with schizophrenia? 
 
The Efficacy and Safety of Treating Hepatitis C in Patients With a Diagnosis of Schizophrenia

M. Z. Mustafa, J. Schofield, P. R. Mills, M. Priest, R. Fox, S. Datta, J. Morris, E. H. Forrest, R. Gillespie, A. J. Stanley, S. T. Barclay

Discussion Only
Full Text Available @ Medscape
Tolerability of interferon amongst patients with schizophrenia (PWS) is of significance given a higher rate of HCV infection within this group. Approaching one in five adults tested amongst a sample of 931 patients with severe mental illness attending US inpatient and outpatient psychiatric facilities were found to have HCV.[3] Screening of patients treated with Clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic reserved for patients with refractory schizophrenia, revealed a prevalence of 4.1%.[4]

Prevalence rates of HCV amongst PWS are higher than controls even in the absence of a self-reported history of substance misuse.[10]
 
Our cohort demonstrates PWS to be good candidates for treatment with interferon containing regimens. It is well tolerated, with only 4% of PWS discontinuing treatment due to psychiatric illness. Despite a rate of cirrhosis twice that of controls, SVR rates were numerically higher amongst both genotype 1- and genotype 2/3-infected PWS.

This intriguing finding is not unique, with a prior study showing a higher SVR rate amongst genotype 2/3 PWS compared with controls.[9] We hypothesize that this may be explained by better compliance with treatment. Amongst our PWS, none discontinued treatment due to the lack of compliance with prescribed medication. Those PWS undergoing treatment had been identified by their treating psychiatrist as stable, and this may in part be due to good compliance with prescribed psychiatric medication.

The increased time from referral to treatment amongst PWS may reflect closer scrutiny of likelihood of treatment success, including compliance. Thus, the PWS we treat are likely a selected cohort with good compliance. We suggest that the well-established relationship between compliance and SVR rates[11,12] may explain our better than expected SVR rates amongst PWS.

In addition to the effects of patient selection on compliance, there is evidence to show that PWS and concomitant diabetes demonstrate improved compliance with oral hypoglycaemic medications,[13] and have lower HbA1c levels,[14] than matched diabetic controls without schizophrenia. This may be as a result of frequent contact and supervision by community psychiatric nurses.

Studies involving direct observed therapy in patients with HCV showed a greater proportion of patients achieving SVR,[15] and one may speculate that psychiatric input designed to aid compliance with antipsychotic medication may have a similar effect. A weakness of our study is a lack of data on the degree of psychiatric support and whether this was predictive of achieving SVR, an area worthy of further research.

Whilst clinical trials of new interferon-free regimens have classified PWS as ineligible for treatment with interferon,[16] there is no convincing data to support this. Whilst these regimens are likely to be better tolerated, cost dictates that they will not be available to all and we would advocate not excluding PWS from treatment with Interferon.

In conclusion, given the disproportionately high rates of chronic hepatitis C in PWS and the good SVR rates reported, we suggest that targeted treatment for this patient group can be safely considered.