Thursday, July 3, 2014

Less than 10 percent of People Infected with Hepatitis C are Cured

Major Gaps in Hepatitis C Care Identified As New Drugs and Screening Efforts Emerge, Penn Study Finds

Less than 10 percent of People Infected with Hepatitis C are Cured

PHILADELPHIA — A new meta-analysis published online in PLOS ONE by infectious disease and epidemiology specialists from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania highlights significant gaps in hepatitis C care that will prove useful as the U.S. health care system continues to see an influx of patients with the disease because of improved screening efforts and new, promising drugs.
In the largest study of its kind, the team examined data culled from 10 studies between 2003 and 2013 and found that less than 10 percent of people infected with hepatitis C in the United States — 330,000 of nearly 3.5 million people — were cured (achieved viral suppression) with antiviral hepatitis C treatment. The researchers also found that only 50 percent of people were diagnosed and aware of their infection; 43 percent of those with the disease had access to outpatient care; and only 16 percent were prescribed treatment.

“This study puts forth a good baseline of hepatitis C care in the United States over the last 10 years—which will be useful in monitoring the success and impact of new screening efforts and advances in antiviral therapy,” said the study’s first author, Baligh Yehia, MD, MPP, MSHP, an assistant professor of Medicine in Penn’s division of Infectious Diseases.

“There are many people who don’t know that they have the infection, don’t have access to hepatitis C care and medications, and who haven’t been treated.  With this data, we can see these gaps more clearly. This information will be useful for ensuring better access to hepatitis c care and treatment in the coming years.”

In June, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began reimbursing for hepatitis C virus screenings for two target populations, including baby boomers (those born between 1945 through 1965) and those at high risk for the infection. Six months prior, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved sofosbuvir, an oral medication shown to cure most cases of hepatitis C infection, with fewer side effects than the current treatment options. Other drugs — which have shown success in clinical trials, some conducted at Penn Medicine—are expected to gain FDA approval within the year.

“The new regimens will be game changers in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C,” said senior author Vincent Lo Re III, MD, MSCE, assistant professor of Medicine and Epidemiology in the division of Infectious Diseases and department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology at Penn.

“Given the high prevalence of this infection, particularly in baby boomers who didn’t know they were infected, having new, highly-effective treatment options to eradicate the virus will be a tremendous benefit to patients that will ultimately help us to reduce liver-related complications and re-infection rates.”
 
Such advances are expected to increase the number of patients treated for the disease.  In the 1990s, HIV treatment turned a monumental corner with the advent of antiretroviral therapy. “It’s a very similar situation that we can learn from,” said Yehia. “With those advances, came challenges with access to and engagement in care. As hepatitis C therapy continues to advance, a focus on improving diagnosis, linkage to care, and insurance coverage will be more critical.”

The team screened close to 10,000 articles before identifying 10 studies that address one or more steps in the cascade of care, ranging from diagnosis to viral suppression. Some of the data came from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Chronic Hepatitis B and C Cohort study. The researchers addressed seven key steps along this cascade and estimated the following based off the data analyzed:

  • Number of people with chronic hepatitis C infection—3.5 million
  • Diagnosed and aware of their infection—1.7 million (50% of those with infection)
  • Those with access to outpatient care –1.5 million (43% of those with infection)
  • Hepatitis C RNA confirmed—950,000 (27% of those with infection)
  • Disease staged by liver biopsy—580,000 (17% of those with infection)
  • Prescribed treatment—550,000 (16% of those with infection)
  • Achieved sustained virologic response—330,000 (9% of those with infection)
“The advent of new antiviral agents for hepatitis C will shorten treatment duration, likely increasing the number of people offered treatment, and improving cure rates, which are the final two steps of the hepatitis C treatment cascade,” said Yehia. “However, educating providers and the general public about prevention, care, and treatment, ensuring access to providers skilled in the treatment of hepatitis C, and addressing the high cost of these agents will be critical to maximizing the benefits of these new therapies.”

Co-authors of the study, which was funded by the National Institutes of Health. include Craig A. Umscheid, MD, MSCE, and Asher J. Schranz, MD.

Related Links
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania Health System

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Liver Cancer Drug Fails to Live Up to Early Promise

Liver Cancer Drug Fails to Live Up to Early Promise
By -- Robert Preidt, HealthDay
Jul. 01, 2014 4:00PM PDT Jul. 01, 2014 4:00PM PDT TUESDAY, July 1, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Although it looked promising in early studies, the drug everolimus didn't improve survival for people with advanced liver cancer in its latest trial, a new study found.

The findings from the phase 3 clinical trial are disappointing because earlier research suggested that everolimus (Afinitor) prevented tumor progression and improved survival for in advanced liver cancer. Normally, these patients can expect a median overall survival of less than one year.

The only drug currently shown to significantly improve survival of advanced liver cancer patients is sorafenib (Nexavar). But that drug's benefits are temporary and the cancer eventually progresses, according to background information in the new study.

The current study included 546 adults with advanced liver cancer whose disease progressed during or after treatment with sorafenib, or who could not take sorafenib. The patients were divided into two groups, with 362 given everolimus and 184 given a placebo.

There were no significant differences in overall survival between the two groups. There were 303 deaths (83.7 percent) in the everolimus group and 151 deaths (82.1 percent) in the placebo group. Median survival was 7.6 months with everolimus and 7.3 months with placebo.

The study appears in the July 2 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

"The results from [this study] extend the list of failed phase 3 studies in advanced [liver cancer], highlighting the challenge of developing effective therapies for this cancer," wrote study author Dr. Andrew Zhu, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, and colleagues.

More information
The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about liver cancer.

Copyright © 2014 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Serum Carnitine Level and Its Associated Factors in Patients With Chronic Viral Hepatitis

*Carnitine is a naturally occurring hydrophilic amino acid derivative, produced endogenously in the kidneys and liver and derived from meat and dairy products in the diet. Carnitine plays a critical role in energy production. It transports long-chain fatty acids into the mitochondria so they can be oxidized ("burned") to produce energy. It also transports the toxic compounds generated out of this cellular organelle to prevent their accumulation. Given these key functions, carnitine is concentrated in tissues like skeletal and cardiac muscle that utilize fatty acids as a dietary fuel...

Future Virology

Serum Carnitine Level and Its Associated Factors in Patients With Chronic Viral Hepatitis

Azin Nassiri, Simin Dashti-Khavidaki, Hossein Khalili*, Mohsen Nassiri-Toosi, Alireza AbdollahiDisclosures

Future Virology. 2014;9(4):373-383.

Discussion Only
Full Text Available @ Medscape
Carnitine is a nonessential amino acid, but an essential cofactor,[6] responsible for transferring long-chain free fatty acid through mitochondrial membranes.[7] The acyl moiety transferred into mitochondria matrix, goes under β-oxidation and ATP production.[53] Without a sufficient source of carnitine, ATP production through β-oxidation fails, resulting in lower energy available for the cells. In our study, serum level of carnitine was significantly lower in patients with chronic hepatitis compared with healthy individuals.

Several mechanisms have been proposed for carnitine deficiency in patients with viral chronic hepatitis. Appetite loss, which is a common complaint in patients with chronic hepatitis, is responsible for reduced dietary intake of carnitine and its precursors' amino acids from the food resources. This theory is supported by results of the present study. A significant positive correlation was founded between the carnitine serum level and carnitine dietary intake. In addition, viral particles in hepatocytes may interfere with the physiological synthetic pathway of carnitine from its precursors. Since the last step of carnitine synthesis (butyrobetaine hydroxylation), happens almost exclusively in the liver,[53,54] a decrease in hepatic function following viral infection, may lead to a decrease in serum carnitine level.[45] However, level of serum albumin and PT, representing as two indicators of liver biosynthesis function, were not disturbed in our patients. Comparing PT between the patients with and without carnitine deficiency was surprising. Patients with carnitine sufficiency had longer PT. Antithrombotic activity and reduced levels of CRP and plasma fibrinogen (Factor I) have been reported for carnitine. PT, as an indicator for activity of Factor I, II, V, VII and X, increased in patients with higher level of carnitine.[55,56]

In the current study, although carnitine deficiency was common in both patients with chronic hepatitis B or C infection, a more severe form of deficiency was detected in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection. This finding may be due to different responses of the immune system to the viral infections. Assembling and secretion of hepatitis C virus is the same as for the LDL pathway, and this virus can escape the adaptive immune system. In other hand, HBV is completely detected by the immune system.[57,58] Having an important role in immunomodulation, carnitine is consumed by the immune system cells to clear HBV.[59,60] It has been shown that carnitine deficiency may play a role in persistence of HBV infection. Increases in Th1-mediated cytokine production, resulted in a strict control on viral replication, whereas Th2-mediated cytokine production contributed to persistence of the virus.[61,62] HBV antigens tend to eliminate Th1 cells by Fas–FasL-mediated mechanisms, putting Th2 cells in charge of cytokine production.[63] Carnitine has shown promising effects on reducing Fas–FasL-related apoptosis, which in turn increased Th1 cell count and, consequently, better control of HBV infection.[64]

Even small numbers of the cirrhotic patients in our study, higher level of serum carnitine in this population was detected. This may be due to hepatocyte damage and following release of intra-hepatocyte carnitine into the bloodstream.[20] Reduction in carnitine clearance following kidney damage is another possible mechanism that may change serum carnitine levels in cirrhotic patients.[65] In most patients with advanced liver diseases, kidney function is disturbed to some extent.[66] In our study there was a positive but not significant correlation between the level of serum carnitine and serum creatinine. In the study by Krahenbuhl et al., the authors also reported a positive association between serum carnitine and serum creatinine.[48] However the level of serum creatinine was the same between the healthy control group (with normal carnitine level) and the cirrhotic patients (with high carnitine levels). Third, increase in carnitine synthesis in sites other than the liver may be another factor that cause elevated carnitine levels in chronic hepatitis. The first step for biosynthesis of carnitine is methylation of lysil, which is naturally in protein bound to skeletal muscles,[67] and should be released by proteolysis.[53,54] As a result, increased muscle turnover, provides new resources for lysine and can increase carnitine synthesis. Increased skeletal muscle turnover was reported in patients with advanced liver diseases.[68,69]

There are few studies with respect of evaluating serum carnitine status in patients with viral hepatitis; nonetheless, the results of these studies are very conflicting, and in some cases are even controversial. In the most recent study in 2010, by Anty et al. serum carnitine level has been evaluated in patients with chronic hepatitis C.[36] In agreement with our findings, lower serum carnitine level in these patients compared with normal subjects was reported. The exact pathological mechanism of such deficiency was not investigated, but the authors proposed that the presence of the virus in hepatocytes disturbs synthetic capacity of the liver, resulting in low serum level of carnitine.

The other study by Malaguarnera et al. supported this finding as well. In the mentioned study, serum carnitine level was measured before and after therapy with IFN-α. Serum carnitine level, which was low prior to therapy, was elevated but did not reach the normal level after treatment.[70]

Owing to the important effect of carnitine in energy production, it is proposed that deficiency of this substance may play a key role in developing fatigue. Based on this theory, Kurastune et al. evaluated serum level of carnitine in various diseases with the common manifestation of fatigue. Significant decrease in serum carnitine levels in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and chronic hepatitis C, but not in other diseases, was detected.[37]

These findings were in contrary with the results of a study by Eskandari et al..[20] In patients with chronic viral hepatitis type B and C, they showed an elevated level of serum carnitine in comparison with the healthy control group. They proposed that the leakage of intracellular carnitine from damaged hepatocyes into the bloodstream was responsible for this elevation. The leakage results in lower level of active carnitine within the cells and subsequently decreases β-oxidation of the free fatty acids, and causes an increase in serum triglyceride level.[20] We also detected a reverse correlation between serum concentrations of carnitine and triglyceride in patients with chronic hepatitis and the level of TG was significantly higher in carnitine-deficient patients. One underestimated issue in Eskandari's study was that it was not specified whether participants suffered from liver cirrhosis or not, since the stage of the liver disease has a crucial impact on the serum level of carnitine.[48]

Kranhenbul et al. evaluated serum carnitine level in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic liver diseases.[48] They found that serum carnitine level in noncirrhotic patients and the healthy controls was the same and in cirrhotic patients was 29% higher than the control group. They did not evaluate serum carnitine level in different subgroups of cirrhosis (e.g., viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis and cryptogenic cirrhosis).[71] This finding supported the results of two other studies by Amodio et al. [72] and Palombo et al.,[73] in which the reported serum levels for carnitine were higher in end-stage liver diseases with different causes. In our study, cirrhotic patients compared with noncirrhotic patients had a higher level of serum carnitine but l-carnitine level was still lower than that of the healthy controls.

In addition to the stage of the liver disease, it is proposed that the duration of viral infection has an important effect on serum carnitine level. All of the patients included in our study had chronic viral hepatitis and at least 6 months had elapsed after infection. Serum carnitine level seems to be much different in acute phase of hepatitis. In the study of Kuratsune et al., acute hepatitis was induced in mice by galactosamine administration.[37] Following induction of acute hepatitis, serum carnitine level was significantly higher in comparison with the level of control group.

Although number of patients suffering from liver cirrhosis was small (22 out of 86 patients) in our study, but serum carnitine level was significantly higher in cirrhotic than noncirrhotic patients. As mentioned above, several studies confirmed that cirrhosis can significantly alter serum carnitine concentration; as a result, further studies regarding Iranian cirrhotic patients must be carried to make a conclusion. Another important issue is that we evaluated the total serum carnitine. Carnitine is present in bloodstream as two different forms; free carnitine (without an attached acyl group) and esterified carntitine (which is attached to an acyl group with carbon chain of various lengths).[53] The ratio of these two different forms of this compound is a reflection of hepatic acylation, which is important in fatty acid oxidation.[74] In hepatic diseases, levels of acyl-carnitine, free carnitine and total carnitine tend to alter differently and even in opposite patterns. This difference should be noted in future studies. Also, due to our small sample size we could not subdivide patients according to their treatment regimen and duration of therapy. Also carnitine dietary intake was calculated through estimations and differences in cooking methods can alter the amount of carnitine in foods dramatically.

Continue reading....

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

July Update: Sofosbuvir Based Hepatitis C Clincial Trials

The hepatitis C clinical trials on this page are not a complete list; to learn more about HCV trials or to find out if a study is enrolling patients in your area, please click  here. View additional hepatitis trials updated in the last 30 days @ ClinicalTrials.gov

United States
Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir+Ribavirin in Genotype 2 HCV-infected U.S. Veterans With Cirrhosis (VALOR-HCV) 

This study is currently recruiting participants 

Verified June 2014 by Gilead Sciences
Information provided by (Responsible Party): Gilead Sciences 

Purpose
This study will examine the safety, tolerability, and antiviral efficacy of sofosbuvir (SOF)+ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced United States Veterans with compensated cirrhosis and genotype 2 HCV infection.

Condition Intervention Phase
Hepatitis C Virus Infection Drug: Sofosbuvir
Drug: RBV
Phase 4

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02128542
Contact: Gilead Study Team GS3341379study@gilead.com

First received: April 29, 2014
Last updated: June 9, 2014
Last verified: June 2014
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

India

Purpose
 This is a multi-center, randomized, open-label study to evaluate the antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sofosbuvir+ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naive adults with chronic genotype 1 or genotype 3 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
 
Condition Intervention Phase
Chronic HCV Infection Drug: Sofosbuvir
Drug: RBV
Phase 3

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02074514 
Contact: Gilead Study Team gs3340116study@gilead.com

First received: February 26, 2014

Last updated: June 27, 2014
Last verified: June 2014
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not Yet Recruiting

United States, Australia, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Russian Federation 
Safety and Efficacy of Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin in Adolescents and Children With Genotype 2 or 3 Chronic HCV Infection

This study is not yet open for participant recruitment. 

Verified June 2014 by Gilead Sciences
Sponsor:  Gilead Sciences
Information provided by (Responsible Party): Gilead Sciences

Purpose 
This study will have two parts as follows: The PK Lead-in Phase of the study will evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics (PK) and confirm the dose of sofosbuvir (SOF) in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected pediatric participants. The PK Lead-in Phase will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of 7 days of dosing of SOF+ribavirin (RBV) in HCV-infected pediatric participants.
The Treatment Phase will be initiated by age cohort after confirmation of age-appropriate SOF dosage levels. Participants from the PK Lead-in Phase will immediately rollover into the Treatment Phase with no interruption of study drug administration. The Treatment Phase will evaluate the antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of SOF+RBV for 12 or 24 weeks in pediatric participants with genotype 2 or 3 HCV infection, respectively.

Condition Intervention Phase
Hepatitis C Virus InfectionDrug: SOF
Drug: RBV
Phase 2

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02175758
Contact: Gilead Study Team 334-1112alerts@gilead.com

First received: June 24, 2014
Last updated: NA
Last verified: June 2014
History: No changes posted
Click here to learn more
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contact and Locations Not Provided
A Phase 3 Study of a Daclatasvir/Asunaprevir/BMS-791325 Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 (UNITY 4) 

This study is not yet open for participant recruitment

Verified June 2014 by Bristol-Myers Squibb
Information provided by (Responsible Party): Bristol-Myers Squibb 

Purpose
To demonstrate the effectiveness of Daclatasvir (DCV) 3 Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA) fixed dose combination in Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C subjects.
Condition Intervention Phase
Hepatitis C VirusDrug: DCV/ASV/BMS-791325Phase 3

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02170727
Contact and Locations Not Provided

First received: June 20, 2014
Last verified: June 2014
History: No changes posted 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contact and Locations Not Provided
Short Duration Combination Therapy With Daclatasvir, Asunaprevir, BMS-791325 and Sofosbuvir in Subjects Infected With Chronic Hepatitis-C (FOURward Study)

This study is not yet open for participant recruitment. 

Verified June 2014 by Bristol-Myers Squibb
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Bristol-Myers Squibb 

Purpose
The purpose of the study is to determine whether the combination of Daclatasvir, Asunaprevir, BMS-791325 and Sofosbuvir is effective and safe in treating Hepatitis-C virus.
Condition Intervention Phase
Hepatitis CDrug: DCV/ASV/BMS-791325
Drug: Ribavirin
Drug: Sofosbuvir
Drug: Peginterferon α-2a
Phase 2

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02175966
Contact and Locations Not Provided

First received: June 25, 2014
Last verified: June 2014
History: No changes posted
Click here to learn more..... 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For additional information visit HCV Advocate News and Pipeline for trial updates;





Listen: Proper Diet Is Critical for Patients with Liver Disease

Proper Diet Is Critical for Patients with Liver Disease 
Jun 30, 2014
For patients struggling with liver disease, diet can become a matter of life and death. Dr. Juan Gallegos talks about how daily food choices can impact the diseased liver. He also gives some tips for improving diet and prolonging the lives of patients with liver disease.

Click here to listen


HCV July News: Noninvasive tests used to measure liver fibrosis


HCV July News: Noninvasive tests used to measure liver fibrosis

Hello everyone, we begin the month of July with information about noninvasive tests used to measure severity of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection.

In the July issue of Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, researchers found a combination of blood tests which focus on fibrosis and cirrhosis; are more accurate than liver biopsy for determining liver prognosis in hepatitis C. A quick summary of the study published over at Gastrohep.com, is provided further down the page. 

Transient Elastography
FibroScan® was FDA approved in April 2013, and is one noninvasive test most of us are familiar with. FibroScan®, sometimes called transient elastometry (TE), is a noninvasive test designed to measure liver fibrosis, (arguably) comparable to a liver biopsy, particularly in the higher end of the Metavir scale (Stages 3 and 4). The procedure is comparable to ultrasound tests we have had to diagnose other internal diseases. Henry Ford Hospital, in Detroit, offers a closer look;
The skin in the area of the liver is first coated with a water-based gel. The doctor then passes an ultrasound sensor over the area to take 10 consecutive readings. The sensor produces vibrations that create a low-frequency seismic wave sent between the ribs and into the liver. The speed of the wave as it passes through the liver is used to determine the hardness or stiffness of the organ – the faster the wave, the harder the tissue.

For additional information head over to NATAP for a clinical assessment of Fibroscan, including patients with both NAFLD and HCV, hepatitis C alone, hepatitis B and other liver disease. Another great article can be found in the June Issue of HCV Next @ Healio; The Next Wave: Noninvasive Alternatives to Assess Fibrosis.  In addition, HCV Advocate recently published an article by Maurizio Bonacini, MD; Use of Fibroscan® in Clinical Practice, and finally, check out; FibroScan® Scoring Card - Understanding The Results.

From Gastrohep.com:

Combination blood tests improve the assessment of liver-prognosis in Hep C

A study in the latest Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics finds that the combination of blood tests for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis improves the assessment of liver-prognosis in chronic hepatitis C.

Recent longitudinal studies have emphasised the prognostic value of noninvasive tests of liver fibrosis and cross-sectional studies have shown their combination significantly improves diagnostic accuracy.

Dr Boursier and colleagues compared the prognostic accuracy of 6 blood fibrosis tests and liver biopsy, and evaluated if test combination improves the liver-prognosis assessment in chronic hepatitis C.

A total of 373 patients with compensated chronic hepatitis C, liver biopsy (Metavir F) and blood tests targeting fibrosis or cirrhosis were included.

Significant liver-related events and liver-related deaths were recorded during follow-up.

During the median follow-up of 9.5 years, the team found that 47 patients had a liver-related events, and 23 patients died from liver-related causes.

For the prediction of first liver-related events, most blood tests allowed higher prognostication than liver biopsy with a significant increase for FIB.

The team found that FibroMeter, CirrhoMeter and sustained viral response were independent predictors of first liver-related events.

CirrhoMeter was the only independent predictor of liver-related death.

The team observed that the combination of FibroMeter and CirrhoMeter classifications into a new FM/CM classification improved the liver-prognosis assessment compared to liver biopsy staging or single tests by identifying five subgroups of patients with significantly different prognoses.

 Boursier's team concluded, "Some blood fibrosis tests are more accurate than liver biopsy for determining liver prognosis in chronic hepatitis C."

"A new combination of 2 complementary blood tests, one targeted for fibrosis and the other for cirrhosis, optimises assessment of liver-prognosis."

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014: 40(2): 178–18801 July 2014

National and Local Leaders Launch Hepatitis C Campaign In ROC

National and Local Leaders Launch Hepatitis C Campaign In ROC
 
Local and national leaders are kicking off a campaign to help raise awareness about the impact of Hepatitis C in the African American community.

"Today, we are here to launch this campaign to educate our community, to educate our legislative officials to try to implement funding and programs to help fight Hepatitis C in the African American community," says Leatrice Wactor, the Regional Director of National Black Leadership Commission on AIDS.

Wactor says African Americans have a substantially higher rate of chronic Hepatitis C infection than Caucasians and other racial and ethnic groups.

Hepatitis C, often called the “silent epidemic”, is a chronic virus that causes liver disease and related cancer.

The viral infection, which is curable, affects approximately 400 people in Monroe County.

County Health Director Dr. Byron Kennedy says that number is higher than the amount of Hepatitis B and HIV cases here locally. He says there are between 70 to 100 new cases of HIV each year.

"So that alone shows you how large the impact is right now,” says Dr. Kennedy. “And yet we know that there are perhaps many who have Hepatitis C and don't know they have it. One of the reasons for them to get tested is so they can know their status, and those who end up testing positive be linked to care early."

Dr. Kennedy says part of the focus for today's "call to action" is creating the opportunity for increased screenings among Baby Boomers, who are most vulnerable. They are five times more likely to have been infected, and most don’t know they are infected.

Others who are most at risk for Hepatitis C include people who have experienced injected drug use, had blood transfusion before 1992 or have a sexually transmitted disease.

Although symptoms of Hepatitis C are not allows present, Dr. Kennedy says there are a few: fever, nausea, and yellowing of the skin and eye whites.

Source - WXXINews

Dual Antiviral Treatment:Treating HCV-Associated Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis

Dual Antiviral Treatment May Have Edge in Treating HCV-Associated Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Dual antiviral therapy seems more effective than standard immunosuppression or rituximab only at treating cryoglobulinemic vasculitis associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, researchers from Russia report.

Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis may affect 5% of patients with HCV infection. Previous research has shown both rituximab and antiviral treatment to be effective in these patients, Dr. Sergey Moiseev and colleagues from First Moscow State Medical University note in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, online June 12.

The team looked at outcomes of 65 of their patients with HCV-associated mixed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis who were treated with conventional immunosuppressive drugs (n=30), monotherapy with interferon alpha (n=9), rituximab (n=8), or peginterferon alpha-ribavirin with or without rituximab (n=18).

Relapse-free survival was numerically longer with antiviral treatment than with rituximab or conventional treatment, the researchers found.

More than 70% (5/7) of patients treated with interferon alpha monotherapy experienced deterioration of vasculitis, compared with only one of 18 patients treated with dual antiviral therapy with or without rituximab.

Just over half of patients with genotype 1 (8/15) and all three patients with genotype 2 or 3 infection experienced sustained virological response with combination antiviral treatment. Seven of these 18 patients developed hematological complications.

The researchers acknowledge that lack of randomization and small sample size represent significant limitations of their study.

"Dual antiviral treatment is better tolerated and in our opinion can be offered to patients with higher probability of sustained virological response to peginterferon-alpha/ribavirin, for example, with favorable interleukin-28B polymorphism," the authors conclude.

"Recently, a large scale trial showed high efficacy and excellent safety of the single tablet regimen of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for primary patients with HCV genotype 1 infection," they add. "The study of these and other interferon-free regimens are also warranted in patients with HCV-associated mixed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis."

Dr. Moiseev did not respond to a request for comments.

SOURCE
Ann Rheum Dis 2014.