Monday, August 12, 2013

Hepatitis C - A Look At Disease Progression

After receiving a hepatitis C diagnosis, understanding how the virus damages the liver soon becomes the task at hand.

The natural history of hepatitis C remains controversial. Among HCV-infected individuals progression to advanced liver disease generally requires decades but is influenced by several host factors and has been proven to be highly variable. For instance studies have shown alcohol consumption is associated with HCV progression; active alcohol use increases the relative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma when compared to people who do not drink. Co-infection with HCV and HBV may also lead to a greater risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and more severe liver disease than does HCV infection alone.

Researchers in the 2012 issue of Seminars in Liver Disease found here, named the above mentioned in addition to smoking, age and duration of HCV infection as host factors relevant in determining the progression of hepatitis C;

 (1) the duration of HCV infection; (2) the presence of cofactors for development of liver fibrosis (such as male gender,  ethnicity, older age at infection, heavy alcohol intake,  HIV or chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection, diabetes,  obesity, and hepatic steatosis); (3) access to HCV therapy and a favorable treatment response; and (4) competing mortality risk (such as HIV and illicit drug-related overdose).
The generally slowly progressive nature of chronic HCV, with limited advanced liver disease in the initial 10 to 15 years of infection (even in those individuals with cofactors for fibrosis development), means that duration of HCV infection and its surrogate, age, are key determinants of mortality risk.
Thus, a 50-year-old individual with 30 years chronic HCV is likely to have a higher HCV-related mortality risk, even in the absence of liver disease cofactors, than a 30-year-old individual with 5 to 10 years infection and several cofactors. However, the 50-year-old individual with 30 years infection, with heavy alcohol intake, obesity, and regular cannabis smoking (recently shown to be a liver fibrosis cofactor) will be at particularly high risk.

Out Of 100 People Who Contract HCV

Some studies describing hepatitis C progression can be confusing, and may have conflicting results. However, there is a general consensus after acquiring the virus it takes 10 to 15 years before evidence of the disease appears on biopsy, 20 or so years to develop cirrhosis, and around another decade to develop liver cancer. The statistics are overwhelming, Medscape offers a clear perspective in this 2012 article:

Hepatitis C Therapy Update
Lisa C. Casey, William M. Lee
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28(3):188-192. 

Out of 100 people that contract the infection, 75–85 people will develop chronic infection, 60–70 people will develop chronic liver disease, five to 20 people will develop cirrhosis over the course of their chronic infection and one to five people will die of complications including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

A therapy update published in 2013 from the same authors is available @ Medscape.  

*Free registration  required

Unique Study Cohort

Researchers often reference a unique cohort of HCV patients when describing the natural history of hepatitis C. Never has there been a more perfect natural history study, in that - the known dates of infection were clear and precise. This for the most part is difficult to achieve since the time of acute HCV infection is often impossible to establish. The somewhat famous and tragic cohort include 704 Irish women and 917 German women exposed to hepatitis C from contaminated Anti-D immunoglobulin  in 1977–8 from a single source. Researchers have studied the aging population of women at 17, 20, 25 and 35 years after infection. A few of those studies have been added to this summary, with more recent research following each study. Offering an interesting comparison of data. Other highlights include: disease progression- including host factors, achieving SVR in relation to disease outcome, mother to child transmission (from the cohort of women) and the risk for HCV-related liver and non-liver diseases. A few links to learning activities for anyone contemplating treatment with triple therapy and a recent report on the promise of interferon-free therapy.

Spontaneous Clearance

1999 - 2000
Irish women - German women

Early research found the rates of viral clearance in the Irish women were high. Out of the 704 young Irish women infected research from (Kenny-Walsh 1999; Wiese 2000) found only 390 or 55% had detectable HCV RNA. The remaining 45% were HCV-antibody-positive, but had no detectable viremia. Wiese and colleagues observed similar rates of viral clearance among young women in the cohort of 917 German women. Of the 85% (779/917) with antibodies to hepatitis C, only 55% (428/779) had detectable HCV RNA.

Current Research
2013

IL28B, HCV genotypes, sex linked to spontaneous acute HCV clearance 
August 9, 2013

A recent study reported female patients and those with HCV genotype 1 and/or IL28B CC genotype were more likely to experience spontaneous clearance of acute hepatitis C infection. Commentary on the study is available online at Healio.

2000

Irish Women

Pregnancy and pregnancy outcome in hepatitis C type 1b

Discussion
Full Text Published in QJM (July 2000)
Oxford Journals

The introduction of anti‐D immunoglobulin has proved extremely effective in the management of rhesus haemolytic disease, with deaths attributed to rhesus immunization falling dramatically from 46 per 100 000 births before 1969 to 1.6 per 100 000 in 1990.17 While intravenous immunoglobulin was thought to be a relatively safe product,18 there have been two reported epidemics of hepatitis C as a result of its use. Two distinct cohorts of Irish women became infected following exposure to contaminated anti‐D immunoglobulin in 1977/8 and 1991/3, respectively.1 Intravenous anti‐D immunoglobulin was implicated in the large scale transmission of hepatitis C in the former East Germany in 1978.19 
Production of anti‐D immunoglobulin in Ireland was commenced by the Blood Transfusion Service Board (BTSB) in 1970. Freeze‐dried intravenous anti‐D immunoglobulin was prepared from plasma containing a high concentration of anti‐D antibody procured in Ireland by the Hoppe method.20 The Hoppe method was refined in 1972, with the main objective of increasing the volume of anti‐D produced. The 1972 method replaced the process of ethanol precipitation with an ultrafiltration step, and also involved a quarantine period of 6 months before using plasma for the preparation of anti‐D. Hoppe believed that by pooling and fractionating only those plasmas which had been stored at least 6 months at −40°C provided a further safeguard against transmitting hepatitis. He believed that storing the plasma until the donor had been examined and repeatedly tested would provide further protection. However, modification of the Hoppe method21 in 1972 was not implemented by the Irish BTSB. 
We have studied women who were primipara and received contaminated anti‐D immunoglobulin post delivery in 1977/8. This represents a unique group of patients for whom the source and time of infection are clearly defined. While mindful of the relatively small size of the study group, we have found no evidence of either an increased risk of miscarriage or an adverse effect on subsequent pregnancies. Indeed in the general population, the incidence of spontaneous miscarriage has been estimated at 15–20% of all pregnancies,22 as compared with just 12.4% in the study group. Our study indicates that obstetric intervention and mode of delivery (including normal vaginal delivery, forceps/vacuum delivery and caesarean section) is not significantly influenced by the presence of HCV infection. Our study also shows that HCV infection does not increase the risk of obstetric complications and obstetric interventions. 
The favourable outcome of pregnancy and the low transmission rate of HCV may be explained partially by the endogenous production of interferon (IFN). Evidence of this production is indicated by findings from a number of studies. For example, the human placenta has been demonstrated to be a site of IFN manufacture.23 Interferon activity has also been detected in human amniotic fluid,24,,25 in placental blood26 and in perfused placenta.27 Immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated IFNs in feto‐placental units.28 
Vertical transmission of HCV occurred in one pregnancy in the study group. While we noted two major congenital abnormalities in the affected group, the number of cases is too small to test any hypothesis as to the possible role of HCV infection.  

Continue to full text.......

Current Research 
2012

Mother to child vertical transmission

Excerpt:
Chronic HCV infection: epidemiological and clinical relevance
BMC Infectious Diseases 2012, 12(Suppl 2):S2 doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-S2-S2
Published: 12 November 2012

Mother-to-child vertical transmission of HCV is reported to occur in 3-10% of cases, mostly in the late intrauterine period, at delivery or in the peri-natal period. Many factors have been reported to influence the transmission rate, including maternal high viral load, labour duration, newborn gender, premature membrane rupture and genotype. The role of elective cesarean section to reduce mother-to-child transmission rates is debated and controversial and the guidelines of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) does not recommend cesarean section to prevent HCV vertical transmission...........

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/12/S2/S2

*The risk is 2–3 times greater if the woman is coinfected with HIV.

2001 
Irish Women

21/22 years of infection


Published in GUT (February 2001)

An international peer-reviewed journal 

The natural course of hepatitis C virus infection after 22 years in a unique homogenous cohort: spontaneous viral clearance and chronic HCV infection 
The aim of this study was to investigate some of the unresolved issues regarding the natural history of HCV infection in a representative subgroup of women (with chronic infection or spontaneous self limited infection) derived from the Irish cohort. The clinical and histological status of these women was investigated at the time of diagnosis in 1994/95 and after 4–5 years of follow up (21/22 years after inoculation). Other features investigated included: symptomalogy, psychosocial impact of HCV infection, extrahepatic manifestations, and HLA class II associations. 

Discussion Only

Full Text Available Here 

This study investigated the natural course of HCV genotype 1b infection in a representative subgroup of a larger homogenous cohort (n=795) who were infected with HCV via contaminated anti-D immunoglobulin in 1977.5 The 87 women with chronic HCV infection and 68 with spontaneous viral clearance described in this study shared similar ethnic origin, sex, demographic characteristics, duration of disease, mode of acquisition, viral genotype, and lacked other possible causes of liver disease. A benign course of HCV infection, lack of disease progression, and low incidence of extrahepatic manifestations were observed in women with chronic HCV infection after a 22 year period.  
This benign and non-progressive course of chronic HCV infection was reflected clinically in the mildly elevated serum ALT activity at presentation (17 years after inoculation) (mean 50.6 (31) IU/l) and after five years of follow up (mean 51 (37.5) IU/l). Similarly, the mild histological activity observed at presentation was reflected in the mean HAI and fibrosis scores of 4.1 (1.4) and 1.1 (1.3), respectively. Histological deterioration was not observed after a five year follow up period as the mean follow up HAI and fibrosis scores were 4.1 (1.2) and 1.0 (1.0), and 22.7% (10/44) of biopsies even showed a spontaneous reduction in HAI score.19 Cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma was not observed on the first or subsequent liver biopsy. These results confirm the findings of fellow investigators on Irish anti-D patients showing lack of disease progression over similar time spans but conflict with other studies observing significant fibrosis, cirrhosis, and advanced liver disease within 20 years of disease duration.6 19-26 Several variables have been suggested to influence the progression of HCV, including older age at infection and diagnosis, male sex, excess iron, increased alcohol consumption, and coinfection with hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus.27-33 Mode of transmission is also thought to be important as patients infected via transfusion receive a more infectious inoculum while those who acquire HCV via anti-D immunoglobulin receive a partially attenuated virus.34 The relatively young age (late 20s) of the women in this study at infection, together with the mode of transmission, and absence of excess alcohol consumption, iron on liver biopsy, and coinfection with other viruses probably contributes to the favourable outcome observed in this unique cohort. 
Sixty eight females considered to have spontaneous viral clearance were also investigated in this study. Of these, 32 (47.1%) were still antibody positive 18 years after inoculation. Debate exists as to whether these individuals have truly resolved infection or actually have current infection undetectable in serum but detectable in liver (as viral levels have been demonstrated to be 104-fold higher in the liver than in serum). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated in two separate studies that antibody positive serum PCR patients have similar clinical, histological, and virological profiles as serum PCR positive individuals.35-39 In this study, the mean serum ALT was significantly lower in PCR negative women compared with PCR positive women (p=0.000) (table 3). Similarly, the mean HAI and fibrosis scores of the 27 (40%) PCR negative women who underwent liver biopsy were also significantly lower than those of PCR positive women (p=0.000) (table 3). Furthermore, HCV RNA was not detectable in liver biopsies from serum PCR negative women but was detectable in biopsies from all serum PCR positive women, thus providing evidence that the negative serum PCR status is indeed a true reflection of cleared past infection. Steatosis was however observed at a higher frequency in PCR negative liver biopsies (48%v 10.3% in PCR positive biopsies; p=0.000). In a recent study of a larger group of serum PCR negative individuals, we have demonstrated that 63.6% (21/33) were overweight or obese, as determined by calculation of body mass index, and the histological findings of these women were more suggestive of non-specific reactive changes, steatosis, or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis rather than chronic HCV.40 
The 68 women with viral clearance described in this study represent a subgroup of a much larger group with spontaneous viral clearance. The findings from the total infected cohort from 1977 (n=704) may therefore indicate that more individuals spontaneously clear HCV than previously reported, as 314 (45%) of the original cohort were antibody positive but PCR negative for HCV RNA when tested in 1994.4 5Moreover, an additional 74 recipients of 1977 contaminated anti-D volunteered a history of jaundice shortly post partum and are now known to test both antibody and PCR negative.5 In this (table 1) and in another Irish study, a history of acute icteric hepatitis after inoculation has been demonstrated to be associated with spontaneous viral clearance.41 Why such a large proportion of women spontaneously cleared infection while the remainder went on to develop chronic HCV is unclear as the difference in disease outcome cannot be accounted for by differences in age, sex, source/duration of infection, size of inoculum, or alcohol consumption. These findings may therefore suggest that immune-host factors play an important role in the spontaneous clearance of HCV, and in this study the class II DRB1*01 allele was significantly increased in women with spontaneous viral clearance compared with those with chronic HCV infection. These results confirm the findings of a previous study on a larger cohort of these patients and also the findings of two other studies of separate groups of women from the same homogenous cohort.14 42 43  
A wide spectrum of extrahepatic manifestations has been traditionally ascribed to chronic HCV infection, with varying strengths of association. The best described of these include cryoglobulinaemia, sicca complex, autoimmune thyroiditis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and porphyria cutanea tarda.44-46 In our experience, cryoglobulinaemia is the most common of these HCV associated autoimmune disorders. Our observed prevalence rate of 12.7% among PCR positive patients and 0% among PCR negative patients further supports the role of the HCV virus in the pathogenesis of cryoglobulinaemia. In keeping with observations made in Britain, type 3 cryoglobulinaemia was the predominant type.47 However, we have previously demonstrated that Irish anti-D/HCV patients without cryoglobulinaemia were as likely to experience significant fatigue as those with cryoglobulinaemia.15 Tranet al reported a high prevalence of thyroid autoantibodies among patients with chronic HCV infection but did not include the known prevalence rate in healthy controls for comparison.48 The well conducted Wickham survey designed 20 years ago and recently updated provided an ideal sex matched population in the community for this purpose.16 17 Our surprising finding of significantly less autoimmune thyroid disease among the PCR positive population compared with that observed in the Wickham survey does not support the earlier investigators' claims. The observed prevalence rate of thyroid autoantibodies among our PCR negative group may mirror the prevalence among healthy women in the community. Indeed, current studies have failed to establish an association between autoimmune thyroid disease and hepatitis C.49 50 It is likely that the only significance of thyroid autoantibodies in patients with HCV lies in their positive predictive value for interferon associated thyroid dysfunction.51 
Glomerulonephritis and HCV dermopathy, including porphyria cutanea tarda and lichen planus, and antibodies to liver-kidney microsome 1 were not detected in this study group.  
Initially the symptom profile of the PCR positive and negative women presented in this study (PCR positive patients were found to have fewer complaints of fatigue and arthralgia than PCR negative patients at presentation) was contrary to what might be expected, but when calendar year was taken into account there were no differences in complaints of fatigue between the two groups. This observation, together with the psychological profile of 66 of these women, suggested that when suddenly diagnosed with chronic HCV the identity of this illness as chronic, infectious, and associated with intravenous drug misuse may have caused great concern to the infected women. The impact of such a diagnosis on psychological well being may have been even further compounded by the high legal profile related to this patient group.5 While accepting the uniqueness of this patient cohort, recent studies in other patient cohorts have also documented problems in quality of life and mental health.52-54  
In conclusion, this study investigated the natural course of HCV infection in a homogenous cohort almost half of whom now have spontaneous viral clearance. A benign course of HCV genotype 1b infection, lack of disease progression, and low incidence of extrahepatic manifestations was observed in women with chronic HCV after a 22 year period. The host HLA class II DRB1*01 allele was found to be associated with spontaneous viral clearance which supports the notion that host factors may play an important role in disease outcome. Finally, although the outcome of HCV infection was favourable, this study also demonstrated that the diagnosis of HCV was a very stressful event for these women who reported high levels of psychological distress and poor quality of life. It is hoped that longer term follow up of this unique cohort may further provide valuable information regarding the natural course of HCV infection.

Continue reading.....

2005 - German cohort of women after 25 years of infection

While reviewing the research the reader can not help but notice in both groups of women the severity of liver disease increases with the duration of infection. A comment from Atif Zaman, MD, MPH, (provided below) published in the 2005 October issue of Journal Watch, noted in the German cohort of women - after 25 years of infection - the rate of progression to cirrhosis increased during the last 5 years of the study.  It's worth noting the women had few coexisting medical conditions and alcohol consumption was minimal. In that, the outcomes in the cohort cannot be generalized to all HCV patients, Zaman concluded in his comment.

Published in the Journal of Hepatology (October 2005) researchers wrote:

One can conclude that a woman infected with HCV in her mid-20's has a near 50% chance of spontaneous recovery and in those with persistent infection, there is only a 5% probability of developing bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis or HCC during the first 25 years of infection

Commentary

HCV Natural History: study in women exposed to HCV-1b contaminated batches of anti-D immunoglobulin had been administered to 2867 women for prophylaxis of rhesus isoimmunization throughout East Germany in 1978-79

Published in Journal Watch Gastroenterology October 25, 2005

Slow Rate of Disease Progression in HCV-Positive Women

Most data on the natural history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are retrospective and suggest that progression to cirrhosis occurs during 20 to 30 years. In this prospective study, researchers reported 25-year outcomes in a cohort of women in East Germany who acquired HCV infection from a single-source outbreak of contaminated anti-D immunoglobulin in 1978 and 1979.  
Researchers reexamined 1980 women from 15 medical centers (70% of the initial cohort). Mean age at infection was 24; 9.7% of women were obese, and 2.6% had diabetes. Only 3% drank more that 40 g of alcohol daily, and 42% did not drink alcohol at all.  
After 25 years, 62% of patients complained of constitutional symptoms, such as headaches, myalgias or arthralgias, and fatigue. Overall, 54% had cleared the virus (48% spontaneously and 6% in response to interferon). Only 9 patients (0.5%) had developed overt cirrhosis, 30 patients (1.5%) had developed advanced fibrosis, and 1 patient had developed hepatocellular carcinoma. Of the 10 patients who had died of HCV-related complications, half had comorbidities (e.g., alcohol abuse). The rate of disease progression increased slightly between the 20-year and the 25-year follow-up evaluations: During these last 5 years, six women developed cirrhosis, and nine developed advanced fibrosis. 
Comment: In this unique cohort of HCV patients with known dates of infection, the overall rate of disease progression during 20 years was low. However, because the women had few comorbidities and minimal alcohol consumption, the outcomes cannot be generalized to all HCV patients. The rate of progression to cirrhosis increased during the last 5 years of the study.

-Atif Zaman, MD, MPH

 2005

Editorial
HCV natural history: The retrospective and prospective in perspective

Journal of Hepatology
Volume 43, Issue 4 , Pages 550-552, October 2005

The key word in this Editorial, Ôiatrogenic,' is derived from the Greek Ôiatros' meaning physician and Ôgenic' meaning Ôproduced by' or Ôrelated to.' In addition, in current usage, an iatrogenic occurrence must be unintended. Thus, the Merriam Webster definition of iatrogenic is, Ôinduced inadvertently by a physician, surgeon, medical treatment or diagnostic procedure'. Two almost identical and temporally related inatrogenic events involving HCV-contaminated lots of Rh immunoglobulin occurred in Ireland and Germany in the late 1970's. Thousands of women were inadvertently infected with HCV and these Ôexperiments in nature' have, through diligent investigation and long-term follow-up, provided enormous insights into the natural history of HCV infection. 
The long-term outcomes of HCV infection have had differing interpretations during the decades since the predecessor virus, non-A, non-B, was first recognized [1]. In the 1970's, non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH) was viewed by many as an asymptomatic illness of minor consequence; some considered it merely a non-specific transaminitis. However, as these cases were followed prospectively, it became clear that as many as 20% evolved into cirrhosis [2]. This dramatic outcome stimulated clinical interest in NANBH and in the 1980's increasingly dire reports of severe outcomes emerged. In a now classic study by Tong et al. [3] 46% of post-transfusion hepatitis cases had biopsy evidence of cirrhosis and 11% had hepatocellular carcinoma. However, this and similar severe outcome data in the 1980's, reflected referral bias rather than worsening prognosis. Because of early treatment trials and the emergence of specialized hepatitis centers, the most severe cases of NANBH were being referred and then reported. This is not to impugn the relevance of these observations because Ôa case of cirrhosis is a case of cirrhosis' whether it is found prospectively or retrospectively and confirms that dire outcomes can be part of the natural history of HCV infection. However, such retrospective studies do not provide perspective on the proportion of infected individuals who will manifest these severe outcomes over the lifetime of their infection. In the early 90's, after the monumental cloning of HCV by Houghton and associates [4] and the development of sensitive assays to detect antibody to HCV [5], it became possible to introduce an alternate study design (retrospective-prospective) that allowed testing of unselected samples from decades-old serum repositories and then recall of infected patients and controls to assess outcomes over intervals that that extended from 20 to 45 years. These retrospective-prospective studies, free of selection bias, provided several key insights into the natural history of HCV infection. First, it was observed that the spontaneous recovery rate was higher than previously reported and might approach 25% in adults [6]. Other cohort studies have shown spontaneous recovery rates in children [7] and in some adults [8] to be as high as 45-55%, respectively. The other major finding of retrospective-prospective studies that included liver biopsy data was that the incidence of cirrhosis after approximately 20 years was lower than 15% and sometimes less than 5% and that HCV-related mortality over 20 years only marginally differed from that in uninfected controls [6]. In one, albeit small, study of persons infected as young military recruits, the frequency of cirrhosis after almost 50 years was only 6% [9]. Hence, the outcome of hepatitis C, both in terms of spontaneous recovery and severity, tended to ameliorate as one studied defined cohorts rather than referral cases. 
The ideal study to assess HCV natural history is one in which the onset of infection is precisely defined, the infection emanates from a single identified source, where case ascertainment is high, the study population is large, and where follow-up is prospective, comprehensive and of long-duration. Such an idealized combination of study parameters is very difficult to achieve since acute HCV infection is rarely identified, since large common-source outbreaks are unusual and since long-term prospective studies are difficult to support. The iatrogenic outbreaks of hepatitis C related to contaminated Rh immune globulin, though tragic in their occurrence, provide almost all the elements of the perfect natural history study. This is well exemplified in the 25-year follow-up data of Wiese and co-workers [10]. Basically in 1978-79, 14 batches of HCV (genotype 1b)-contaminated Rh immunoglobulin were administered to 2867 women in East Germany. The investigators were able to trace and then follow 1980 women representing 70% of the exposed cohort. Importantly, there was no selection of participants based on outcome, but solely on whether they could be located and were willing to participate in the study. The major findings in this study are highly relevant to HCV natural history assessment and can be summarized as follows: (1) 7% of those with a documented parenteral exposure did not manifest either biochemical or serologic evidence of HCV infection; it is unclear why this sizeable proportion were protected from this highly infectious inoculum and further genetic, molecular and immunologic study of these patients is warranted; (2) of 1718 untreated subjects, a remarkable 49% (836 patients) spontaneously recovery from their HCV infection as evidenced by normal ALT and the absence of HCV RNA; (3) the spontaneous recovery rate was higher in patients who were jaundiced during their acute hepatitis compared to those who were symptomatic but anicteric and those who were asymptomatic (66% vs., 46% vs. 45%, respectively; P<0.001); (4) of the 868 (51%) who developed chronic hepatitis C, 683 were untreated allowing for assessment of natural history over the 25-year duration of the study. Over this prolonged span, only 9 (1.3%) developed cirrhosis, 1 (0.1%) developed HCC and 30 (4.4%) had significant fibrosis that might evolve to cirrhosis; HCV-related mortality was 0.35%; (5) Although <5% progressed to severe fibrosis between years 15 to 25, the trend to escalating severity with increasing time from disease onset was significant by linear regression analysis. 
As an epidemiologic aside, in the absence of an iatrogenic transmission, it is now quite rare in Germany or other industrialized nations to be exposed to HCV because the blood supply has been protected, because occupational exposures have been minimized and because sexual and perinatal transmissions are rare. New HCV infections in the developed world are now almost exclusively in persons who put themselves at risk through shared needle exposures in the course of intravenous drug abuse. Further prevention is more a sociologic issue than a medical issue. The situation is different in developing nations where traditional risks are still prevalent. 
In sum, from the study of Wiese et al. [10] and a similar study in Ireland [11], one can conclude that a woman infected with HCV in her mid-20's has a near 50% chance of spontaneous recovery and in those with persistent infection, there is only a 5% probability of developing bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis or HCC during the first 25 years of infection. These relatively benign outcomes are quite encouraging, but this population represents a best-case scenario because of the young age and general good health at the onset of infection, and the rarity of co-morbid factors. Risk might increase slightly in males and would increase significantly in those infected at ages beyond 40, those with immunodeficiency states, those with excessive alcohol intake and perhaps those with high body mass index. Nonetheless, the 25-year outcome in the natural history of HCV infection is one of higher than expected spontaneous recovery and lower than predicted morbidity and mortality. In addition, one can now anticipate that 50% of those with genotype 1 or 4 infection and 80% of those with genotype 2 or 3 infection can be Ôcured' by combination treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Hence, if one conservatively assumes a 25% spontaneous clearance rate, a mild, non-progressive course in 20% of those chronically infected and a 50% sustained treatment response, one can estimate that in immune-competent persons acutely infected with HCV, the probable lifetime risk of severe liver disease will be less than 30%. This percentage will continue to diminish as therapies improve. While these numbers are encouraging and give reasonable hope to the individual patient who has access to treatment, they do not address the global burden of HCV infection. It is estimated that 170 million persons worldwide are chronically infected with HCV, most of whom reside in developing nations and many of whom may be coinfected with HIV and/or HBV and have very limited access to treatment. Even if only 10% of such individuals advanced to cirrhosis, the global burden of this infection is staggering. Thus HCV, like HIV, is a disease of two worlds, one where new infections are rare and effective treatments are available and one where high population density, inadequate preventive strategies and inaccessible treatments maintain HCV as a common disease with devastating consequences. It is a ÔTale of Two Cities' and we must address them both with equal measure.

Current Research
2012

Chronic HCV infection: epidemiological and clinical relevance
BMC Infectious Diseases 2012, 12(Suppl 2):S2 doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-S2-S2
Published: 12 November 2012

Excerpt:

Natural history and clinical impact

After HCV acute infection an average 50-85% of patients will not clear the virus, with higher rates in HIV-co-infected subjects, and will therefore remain chronically infected with plateau or fluctuating viremia detectable in the blood. The remaining 15-50% will gradually show a decrease and final disappearance of the virus from the blood, usually within 3 months from infection [15,16]. The complex mechanisms regulating virus clearance and persistence are still not completed understood, but probably imply both host and virus factors. The role of ethnicity has not been proved. On the contrary, sexual transmission of HCV and HBV co-infection might favor viral clearance, probably due to limited inoculum and viral interference, respectively [17]. From the virological perspective, the higher the genetic diversity of the infecting virus, the higher the probability that the immune response will not be able to control its replication, resulting in chronic infection, while a narrow quasispecies spectrum is more likely associated to viral clearance [18]. Of note, similar to hepatitis B infection but without genomic integration, it has been recently demonstrated that HCV may replicate in the liver in the absence of detectable viral level in the blood , a condition sometimes referred to as “occult C hepatitis”, with lower potential for progressive disease [19].  
In the setting of persistent hepatitis C viremia, liver fibrosis is the consequence of chronic inflammation leading to the final distortion of hepatic architecture and impairment of liver microcirculation and cell functions. The main consequence of chronic HCV infection is the progression to cirrhosis, often clinically silent apart from non-specific symptoms such as fatigue, upper right quadrant pain or, sometimes, arthralgia and myalgia, until severe complications develop.  
In most cases, abnormal ALT values are the only clinical aspecific findings of the disease, only representing a marker of hepatocellular dysfunction. In particular, a direct correlation between the degree of ALT elevation and stage of the HCV-related disease is often lacking as a significant cytolytic activity is not a surrogate marker of disease severity [20] as well as normal ALT does not always mean an healthy liver. Population-based studies indicate that up to 30%-40% of individuals with chronic HCV have persistently normal ALT values when serially tested. However, significant liver disease, with active inflammation and/or at least significant fibrosis, is biopsy-proven in about 20% of HCV carriers with normal ALT [21].  
Chronic hepatitis C is the most common cause of cirrhosis and the most common indication for liver transplantation in Europe, North and South America, Australia and Japan. The risk of developing cirrhosis ranges from 5% to 25% over periods of 25-30 years [22].  
Environmental and host factors can increase the risk and/or accelerate the natural course of HCV-related disease. Multiple studies have shown that alcohol consumption, in particular a daily intake greater than 40-50 g, is one of the most influential factor driving fibrosis progression in patients with HCV. Age at time of infection also plays a role: the estimated probability of progression is significantly higher in patients that were infected at an older age (> 40 years) [23]. Also, a recent and large analysis of published studies suggests that early acquisition of HCV in childhood is rarely associated to a severe future course of the disease [24]. Other factors that affect the progression of hepatic fibrosis include male gender, the degree of inflammation and fibrosis on the liver biopsy, co-morbidities such as immunosoppression or metabolic condition such as non-alcholic steatohepatitis, obesity and insulin resistance [20].  
In addition, co-infection with HBV or HIV are significant risk factors for liver fibrosis. Approximately 4 to 5 million subjects with chronic hepatitis C are co-infected with HIV. Highest co-infection rates are observed among injection drug users (IDU): in the USA and in Europe, among HIV-infected IDU, HCV prevalence may be as high as 70-90 %. Paradoxically, the longer life-expectancy offered to HIV-infected patients by HAART permits slow-acting HCV-related liver injury to emerge as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-HCV co-infected patients. Furthermore, the progression rate to cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease is accelerated in HIV co-infected patients: they have a twofold increased rate of cirrhosis compared to HCV mono-infected individuals [25], particularly when HIV associated immune-depression progresses.  
The mechanisms underlying accelerated liver disease in HIV-HCV co-infected patients are not completely understood, possibly including direct HCV effects on hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells as well as immunological alterations such as immune activation, apoptosis and impaired HCV specific T-cell response [26]. Furthermore, liver toxicity of anti-retroviral drugs and the burden of metabolic diseases may contribute to a faster progression of liver fibrosis in HIV-HCV co-infected patients.  
Conversely, the role of HCV on the natural history of HIV infection continue to be debated and contrasting evidence exist [27,28].  
HCV replication has been observed in extra-hepatic tissues, such as bone marrow, the central nervous system, endocrine glands, lymph nodes, spleen, monocytes, macrophages and skin cells. HCV is also often associated with profound alterations in the host immune system, resulting in immunological abnormalities and even autoimmune disease such as mixed cryoglobulemia (MC), rheumatoid factor (RF) production, B cell lymphoproliferative disorders that may progress to non–Hodgkin lymphoma, and others. Cryoglobulins are immunoglobulins that precipitate in the cold and are classified into three groups, based on Ig clonality. Type I cryoglobulins are usually associated with lymphoproliferative disorders, including myeloma and Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, and usually consist of monoclonal IgM or IgG, rarely IgA. Type II cryoglobulins are composed of polyclonal IgG and monoclonal IgM, usually characterizing the condition known as essential MC that is often associated with HCV. Type III MC is also characterized by RF activity, although polyclonal IgG and polyclonal IgM exist. The incidence of HCV infection in MC ranges from 40% to 90%, with geographical variations [29]. The high incidence of disease among Mediterranean people and the association of certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) supports that genetic factors play a role in the disease. The clinical picture is characterized by the skin manifestations ranging from purpura of lower limbs to chronic torpid skin ulcers, more frequent in the sovramalleolar regions. Skin reactions include Raynaud’s phenomenon, livedo reticularis, urticaria, and edema. Arthralgias more frequently involve the hands and the knees symmetrically. Renal injury may complicate MC in almost 30% of cases and involvement of the nervous system from 17% to 60%. Peripheral sensory-motor neuropathy can represent the first clinical sign of cryoglobulinemia.

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/12/S2/S2

Current Research 
2013

JAMA - Deaths from liver disease increased from 1990 to 2010

According to a July 10, 2013 article published in the JAMA Journal of The American Medical Association – “The State of US Health, 1990-2010: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors” – deaths from liver disease increased from 1990 to 2010. Liver disease also rose as a contributor to premature mortality. The most common causes of both cirrhosis and liver cancer are viral hepatitis, alcoholism, and obesity-related fatty liver disease. However, it is hepatitis C that is the most likely cause of the emergence of liver disease as a growing threat to American lives, according to a recent comment in this AASLD press release.

The report in JAMA is the first comprehensive analysis of disease burden in the United States in more than 15 years. It includes estimates for death and disability from 291 diseases, conditions, and injuries as well as 67 risk factors

Additionally, NATAP reported the rates of liver cancer in the U.S. more than doubled between 1990 and 2010 while deaths resulting from cirrhosis jumped 43 percent, slides and data available @ the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project (NATAP).

Current Research 
2013

German cohort 35 years of infection

Mild but significant disease progression at 35 years after infection
Patients with self-limited HCV infection or SVR after antiviral treatment were protected from progressive liver disease and showed the best clinical long-term outcome

Evaluation of liver disease progression in the German HCV (1b)-contaminated anti-D cohort at 35 years after infection

Manfred Wiese1,*, Janett Fischer2, Micha Löbermann3, Uwe Göbel4, Kurt Grüngreiff5, Wolfgang Güthoff6, Ulrike Kullig7, Franziska Richter1, Ingolf Schiefke8, Hannelore Tenckhoff2, Alexander Zipprich9, Thomas Berg2,†, Tobias Müller2,‡, for the EAST GERMAN HCV STUDY GROUP‡

Accepted manuscript online: 8 AUG 2013 07:53AM EST | DOI: 10.1002/hep.26644

The natural course of HCV infection remains controversial. The German HCV (1b)-contaminated anti-D cohort provides an ideal population to investigate the natural course of HCV infection in a large and homogenous cohort of young women from the date of HCV inoculation.  
Our previous follow-up studies at 20 years and 25 years after infection suggested slow fibrosis progression rates in this unique cohort.  
The aim of our prospective community-based multicenter study was to re-evaluate the liver disease progression in 718 patients of the original anti-D cohort at 35 years after infection.  
Patients with self-limited HCV infection (n=189) were compared to those who failed to eliminate the virus spontaneously (n=529), comprising patients who were treatment naive (n=197) or achieved a sustained virological response (SVR, n=149) respectively failed to clear the virus (non-SVR, n=183) after antiviral therapy.  
In the overall cohort, 9.3% of patients showed clinical signs of liver cirrhosis at 35 years after infection. Liver disease progression largely depended on the HCV infection status. The highest proportion of patients with clinical signs of end-stage liver disease was observed in the non-SVR group (15.3%), whereas decreased cirrhosis rates were detected in the SVR group (6%) and in patients with self-limited HCV infection (1.1%, p=6.2x10−6).  
Overall survival was significantly enhanced following SVR compared to treatment naive patients or non-SVR (p=0.027).  
Conclusion: The present study provides further evidence for a mild but significant disease progression at 35 years after infection in the German HCV (1b)-contaminated anti-D cohort. Patients with self-limited HCV infection or SVR after antiviral treatment were protected from progressive liver disease and showed the best clinical long-term outcome.

(Hepatology 2013; 00:000-000)

Current Research 
2012

In a study, published online in the August 15th 2012 edition of the Journal of Infectious Diseasesresearchers found increased deaths from both liver-related and non-liver related diseases in patients with active infections who had not cleared their infection

Except from the 2012 press release

The study, published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases and available online, found increased mortality in patients with chronic HCV infection—that is, with detectable levels of HCV genetic material, or RNA, in their blood—suggesting that chronic HCV infections, even in people who have no symptoms, can lead to increased mortality from liver disease or a variety of other causes. The findings highlight the importance of people getting tested for HCV antibodies and for active HCV infection—and of evaluating patients for antiviral treatment when they are found to have an active HCV infection, even when they feel well.  
Chien-Jen Chen, ScD, and researchers from the Genomic Research Center in Taipei, Taiwan, enrolled more than 23,000 adults in Taiwan in their study and followed them from 1991 to 2008. Blood samples were collected at study entry and at follow-up health examinations. Researchers found increased mortality from liver-and non-liver-related diseases—including cancers of the esophagus, prostate, and thyroid, as well as circulatory and renal diseases—among those infected with HCV. Mortality was higher in HCV-infected participants with detectable serum levels of HCV RNA, indicating they had active infections; subjects with previous infections who only had HCV antibodies, but not HCV RNA, in their blood did not have increased mortality on follow-up. The study, published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases and available online, found increased mortality in patients with chronic HCV infection—that is, with detectable levels of HCV genetic material, or RNA, in their blood—suggesting that chronic HCV infections, even in people who have no symptoms, can lead to increased mortality from liver disease or a variety of other causes. The findings highlight the importance of people getting tested for HCV antibodies and for active HCV infection—and of evaluating patients for antiviral treatment when they are found to have an active HCV infection, even when they feel well.

Full text can be found online here, press release here.

Current Research 
2012

SVR reduced all-cause mortality risk in patients with HCV, advanced fibrosis
Van der Meer AJ. JAMA. 2012;308:2584-2593.
December 26, 2012

Patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced hepatic fibrosis were less likely to die from any cause or from liver-related issues after achieving sustained virologic response to interferon-based therapy in a recent study 
In an international, multicenter study, researchers evaluated 530 patients with chronic HCV and cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis (defined as Ishak scores between 4 and 6), who received interferon-based treatment between 1990 and 2003. Incidence of all-cause or liver-related mortality, liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver transplant was recorded over a median of 8.4 years of follow-up. 
Sustained virologic response (SVR) occurred in 36% of cases, including 125 participants who achieved SVR with initial treatment and 67 who experienced SVR with retreatment after a median of 5.8 years. 
During follow-up, 113 participants died, including 13 who achieved SVR. Investigators noted a significant difference in the 10-year cumulative all-cause mortality rates for the groups (8.9% for patients who achieved SVR vs. 26% for those who did not, P<.001). 
Liver-related death occurred in three SVR cases and 70 non-SVR cases, and liver transplant was not required for patients who achieved SVR. Transplant was necessary for 46 patients without SVR (including 13 who subsequently died). Researchers calculated 10-year cumulative liver transplant or liver-related mortality incidence rates of 27.4% for patients who did not achieve SVR and 1.9% who did. HCC occurred in seven SVR cases and 76 non-SVR cases, for cumulative incidence rates of 5.1% and 21.8%, respectively. Four SVR patients experienced liver failure compared with 111 without SVR, with incidence rates of 2.1% and 29.9%, respectively (P<.001 for all comparisons). 
Multivariate analysis indicated associations between SVR and reduced risk for all-cause (HR=0.26, 0.14-0.49) and liver-related mortality or liver transplant (HR=0.06, 0.02-0.19). Patients who achieved SVR also were less likely to develop HCC (aHR=0.19, 0.08-0.44) or liver failure (aHR=0.07, 0.03-0.20) (95% CI for all). 
“Our study indicates that SVR was associated with improved overall survival in patients with chronic HCV infection and advanced hepatic fibrosis,” the researchers concluded. “In addition, we were able to further establish and quantify the risk reduction of HCC, liver failure and liver-related mortality or liver transplantation in patients with SVR.”

Disclosure: See the study for a full list of relevant disclosures
Source - Healio

Current Research 
2013

Long-term Outcome of Chronic Hepatitis C After Sustained Virological Response to Interferon-based Therapy
C. Koh, T. Heller, V. Haynes-Williams, K. Hara, X. Zhao, J. J. Feld, D. E. Kleiner, Y. Rotman, M. G. Ghany, T. J. Liang, J. H. Hoofnagle

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37(9):887-894.
May 7 2013

Excerpt;

The initial 5 of 10 patients treated with antiviral therapy in 1986 at the NIH for chronic HCV achieved an SVR and had both biochemical and histological evidence of improvement in the year following treatment. These five patients have now been followed up for more than 20 years and remain HCV RNA-negative and have normal or near-normal serum enzyme levels.  
Liver biopsies on these patients 10 years after initial therapy showed resolution of the disease activity and regression of fibrosis in some. After this initial study, patients at the NIH were enrolled in various therapeutic trials for chronic hepatitis C. As of 2003, a total of 103 patients had achieved an SVR, all in response to interferon-based therapy. The duration of subsequent follow-up in these 103 patients varied from a few months to as long as 23 years. In this cohort, three patients relapsed, and the remaining 100 patients had markedly improved liver tests at the time of follow-up evaluation and none had clinical evidence of advanced cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation or end-stage liver disease.  
These findings indicate that an SVR from interferon-based therapies for chronic HCV is usually durable and associated with improvement in biomarkers of disease, a favourable long-term prognosis and lack of evidence of progression of liver disease. 
Similar findings after SVR in chronic HCV have been published in other cohorts. However, the current analysis extends this experience to more than 20 years after therapy. Importantly, while patients who achieved an SVR did not develop progressive liver disease, at least one case of HCC still occurred. In this cohort, one patient who had cirrhosis before treatment developed HCC despite having had an SVR 12 years previously. The occurrence of HCC after SVR has been reported in several cohorts, although the rate of liver cancer appears to be far less than occurs among untreated patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C. Such findings suggest that patients with an SVR should continue to have regular surveillance for HCC if they had histological evidence of cirrhosis before treatment. 
A shortcoming of this study is the lack of a control group of patients with chronic hepatitis C who were not treated or a comparison group of patients who were treated but did not achieve an SVR. However, it was not feasible or considered ethical to randomise patients to therapy vs. no therapy and follow them for an indefinite period. In early controlled trials of interferon for hepatitis C, some patients were not treated for the initial 1–2 years after randomisation. However, the controls from those studies were subsequently offered therapy on an open-label basis and some achieved an SVR and are a part of this analysis. Since 1992 and the approval of interferon as therapy of hepatitis C, all large 'controlled' trials of treatment have compared one interferon-based regimen to another and patients were not given placebo or randomised to no therapy. 
Another approach to assessment of the possible benefit of an SVR is to compare patients who achieve an SVR to those who relapse or do not respond. However, multiple studies have shown that patients who have an SVR have a durable loss of HCV RNA and are less likely to have advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. For these reasons, such comparisons require careful balancing of risk factors. Among the 262 patients treated in at this centre, the majority of the non responders were retreated at one time or another, with differing regimens and often at different institutions. 
Use of transient elastography, a non-invasive marker for hepatic fibrosis, suggested that 41% of the cohort had residual evidence of fibrosis at the time of last follow-up 3–23 years after SVR. The elevated elastography scores were not associated with residual abnormalities of serum aminotransferase levels but were more likely to be abnormal in patients who had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis before treatment.  
This suggests that some degree of fibrosis persists despite the resolution of disease activity as assessed by serum enzymes. Slight decreases in platelet counts at the time of final follow-up also correlated with the initial liver histology. Elastography scores were not available from before treatment, but improvements in other markers of advanced disease (platelet count, direct bilirubin, immunoglobulin levels) suggest that SVR may be associated with subsequent improvement in portal hypertension and perhaps partial regression of fibrosis. These findings suggest that the greatest benefit from successful eradication of HCV may be in non-cirrhotic patients, but that even patients with advanced disease, gain a benefit from treatment. 
In summary, with continued follow-up of patients with chronic hepatitis C for up to 23 years after achieving sustained clearance of HCV RNA, progressive liver disease was not seen. Among patients who had advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis before being treated, evidence from platelet counts and transient elastography suggested the persistence of some degree of hepatic fibrosis and a low but continued risk for HCC.

View Full Text @ Medscape

Current Research
2013

Women With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Southern Medical Journal 2013;106(7):422-426.
Mary Jane Burton, MD, James B. Brock, MD, Stephen A. Geraci, MD
July 24, 2013

Excerpt:
The natural history of hepatitis C virus infection differs between women and men. Women demonstrate a slow rate of disease progression until menopause. Older women are more likely to develop fibrosis and are less responsive than younger women to pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Women of childbearing age have higher rates of sustained virologic response, but current therapies are contraindicated during pregnancy. Vertical transmission of hepatitis C virus occurs, but data supporting recommendations for prevention of mother-to-infant transmission are limited. 
Women also manifest slower progression to two major chronic HCV infection complications, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. In a cohort of 376 Irish women chronically infected with HCV from contaminated anti-D immunoglobulin, only 1.9% had progressed to histological cirrhosis after a mean of 17 years following exposure. The low rate of fibrosis progression was confirmed in a 25-year follow-up study of 167 women, of whom 1.2% developed histological cirrhosis.  Male sex was identified as an independent risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma in several studies. This sex-specific predilection for complications of liver disease is not completely understood. Some experts posit that higher estrogen states exert a protective effect on the liver. Animal models suggest that estrogen suppresses hepatic fibrosis, and a recent in vitro study proposed that estrogen inhibits the production of HCV virions. Multiparous women exhibit lower stages of fibrosis than nulliparous women, and fibrosis progression accelerates after menopause. In observational studies, women who received hormone therapy (HT) appeared to have a slower progression to fibrosis; however, the benefits of HT in women with HCV have not been established. HT appears to be safe in women with liver disease when indicated for other reasons.

Complete article and additional information on Women and HCV found here.

Article Source - Medscape

2013 - Treatment Updates

Progress in Treating Hepatitis C Infection

June 6 2013

Video - Hepatitis C: The Pace of  Progress
In recently published studies, sofosbuvir combined with ribavirin alone was shown to be effective for hepatitis C genotype 2 and 3 and possibly genotype 1. This regimen offers a low incidence of side effects, a relatively short duration of treatment, and was effective against all genotypes. These advantages may lower the threshold for HCV treatment for both patients and physicians.

Source - Medscape Medical News from: Digestive Disease Week (DDW) 2013

*Free registration  required

2013 July 12

Video Vignettes -Current Outlook On Hepatitis C Treatment
The Doctor's Channel released a four part video series last month offering key information for anyone considering triple therapy. Sofosbuvir is also included in the series, as is the future of HCV therapy.

2013 "HCV Treatment Pipeline" - By Tracy Swan

Hepatitis C Drug Development Catapults Onward
By Tracy Swan

Highlights:
HCV Treatments in Phase II and Phase III
The Best Combinations
Interferon-Free Regimens in Development for HCV Genotype 1
Interferon-Free Regimens in Development - HCV Genotypes 2, 3, & 4
Cross-company Trials
Next in Line: Simeprevir, Faldaprevir, and Sofosbuvir
Without a PEG to Stand on: The Sofosbuvir Saga Goes on
Biting the (Magic) Bullet
Twinkle, Twinkle, Little (Lone) Star
AbbVie: All Hands on Deck
Bristol-Myers Squibb: All In!
(Genotype) 3 is the new 1
SVR in HCV Genotypes 2 and 3
Cirrhosis: From Frontier to Proving Ground
HIV/HCV Coinfection
Faldaprevir plus PEG-IFN/RBV
Simeprevir plus PEG-IFN and RBV
From Excess to Access
Where Should All the Research Go?
Access the report here.........

Of Interest

2012

July 2012

A STUDY OF THE NATURAL HISTORY OF HEPATITIS C INFECTION
(Trent HCV Study)
Adam John Lawson
BMedSci, BM, BS, MMedSci (Clin Ed)
Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Medicine

2006

Published in the 2006 issue of the International Journal Of Medical Sciences a paper on the natural history of hepatitis C discussing the virus in both acute and chronic phases, disease progression including host factors, liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.  

Hopefully, this small summary will leave you with a better understanding of the natural history of  hepatitis C. As once a patient with hepatitis C, understanding disease progression was on the top of my list, followed by starting treatment and finally curing the virus. I achieved all three, may you all safely do the same.

Photo Credit: www.imagience.com



Galectin Therapeutics Receives FDA Fast Track Designation for GR-MD-02 for Fatty Liver Disease With Advanced Fibrosis

Galectin Therapeutics Receives FDA Fast Track Designation for GR-MD-02 for Fatty Liver Disease With Advanced Fibrosis

NORCROSS, Ga., Aug. 12, 2013 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Galectin Therapeutics (GALT), the leading developer of therapeutics that target galectin proteins to treat fibrosis and cancer, today announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted GR-MD-O2 (galactoarabino-rhamnogalacturonate) Fast Track designation for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with hepatic fibrosis, commonly known as fatty liver disease with advanced fibrosis.

Galectin Therapeutics is currently conducting a Phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability and exploratory biomarkers for efficacy for single and multiple doses of GR-MD-02 over four weekly doses of GR-MD-02 treatment in patients with fatty liver disease with advanced fibrosis. The study will enroll eight patients in each dose escalation cohort and there will be at least three cohorts and potentially up to five cohorts, with a maximum of 40 patients at six clinical sites in the US, which each have extensive experience in clinical trials in liver disease. More information on the first-in-man Phase 1 clinical study of GR-MD-02 is available at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01899859?term=gt-020&rank=1.

"Our preclinical data has shown that GR-MD-02 has robust treatment effects in reversing fibrosis and cirrhosis. Fast Track designation enables us to expedite the compound's development and review process, with the ultimate goal of bringing a first-in-class treatment to the millions of Americans suffering from fatty liver disease with advanced fibrosis," said Dr. Peter G. Traber, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Medical Officer of Galectin Therapeutics Inc. "We are very pleased that the FDA sees the clinical value of GR-MD-02 and seriousness of fatty liver disease, and we look forward to working closely with the FDA throughout this process."

The FDA's Fast Track program is designed to expedite the review of new drugs that are intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions and demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs.

About GR-MD-02

GR-MD-02 is a complex carbohydrate drug that targets galectin-3, a critical protein in the pathogenesis of fatty liver disease and fibrosis. Galectin proteins play a major role in diseases that involve scaring of organs such as cancer, and inflammatory and fibrotic disorders. The drug binds to galectin proteins and disrupts their function. Preclinical data has shown that GR-MD-02 has robust treatment effects in reversing fibrosis and cirrhosis in kidney, lung, and liver.

About Fatty Liver Disease with Advanced Fibrosis

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), also known as fatty liver disease, has become a common disease of the liver with the rise in obesity rates, estimated to affect nine to 15 million people, including children, in the US. Fatty liver disease is characterized by the presence of fat in the liver along with inflammation and damage in people who drink little or no alcohol. Over time, patients with fatty liver disease can develop fibrosis, or scarring of the liver, and it is estimated that as many as three million individuals will develop cirrhosis, a severe liver disease where liver transplantation is the only current treatment available. Approximately 6,300 liver transplants are done on an annual basis in the US. There are no drug therapies approved for the treatment of liver fibrosis.

About Galectin Therapeutics

Galectin Therapeutics (GALT) is developing promising carbohydrate-based therapies for the treatment of fibrotic liver disease and cancer based on the Company's unique understanding of galectin proteins, key mediators of biologic function. We are leveraging extensive scientific and development expertise as well as established relationships with external sources to achieve cost effective and efficient development. We are pursuing a clear development pathway to clinical enhancement and commercialization for our lead compounds in liver fibrosis and cancer. Additional information is available at www.galectintherapeutics.com.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Combination Oral Antivirals Are Now Unnecessary for Chronic HBV Infection


Combination Oral Antivirals Are Now Unnecessary for Chronic HBV Infection

Atif Zaman, MD, MPH reviewing Gordon SC et al. Hepatology 2013 Aug.

Tenofovir suppressed the virus in nearly all patients, even those with high pretreatment viral loads.

Atif Zaman, MD, MPH

With the availability of potent antiviral agents (e.g., entecavir, tenofovir), the majority of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients will achieve successful viral suppression. But is this also true for patients with high viral load (HVL)? Or do they require an additional anti-HBV medication to achieve suppression and prevent the development of resistance?

To answer this question, researchers analyzed virologic response (HBV DNA <400 copies/mL) in patients with and without HVL (baseline viral load ≥9 log10 copies/mL) who had been followed for 240 weeks as part of two previous registration trials comparing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and adefovir for treating HBV infection. The trials included both hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients and both treatment-experienced and treatment-naive patients. At week 48, patients on adefovir were switched to TDF. Patients with persistent viremia (never achieving HBV DNA <400 copies/mL) at week 72 were given the option of continuing TDF alone or adding emtricitabine.

Of 641 patients enrolled, 129 (20%) had HVL. By week 240, virologic response was achieved in 98.3% of patients with HVL and 99.2% of patients without HVL. Patients with HVL took longer to achieve response, but by week 96, rates were similar between the two groups. Notably, in patients with HVL, adding emtricitabine to TDF did not affect virologic response rates. No patient with HVL at week 240 had persistent viremia or developed TDF resistance. Of 13 instances of viral breakthrough, 62% were attributed to noncompliance.

Comment

This study highlights several key features of modern therapy with antivirals for hepatitis B virus infection. First, although patients with high viral loads take longer (up to 96 weeks) to achieve undetectability, eventually all will achieve it. Second, while awaiting HBV DNA undetectability, resistance development is not a worry. Third, the main cause of viral breakthrough is noncompliance. Finally, combination therapy does not improve HBV response or outcomes.

Editor Disclosures at Time of Publication
Disclosures for Atif Zaman, MD, MPH at time of publication Speaker’s bureau Bristol-Myers Squibb; Genentech; Gilead; Kadmon; Merck; Salix; Vertex

Citation(s):
Gordon SC et al. Efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at 240 weeks in patients with chronic hepatitis B with high baseline viral load. Hepatology 2013 Aug; 58:505. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.26277)

PubMed abstract (Free)

Source- http://www.jwatch.org/na31904/2013/08/08/combination-oral-antivirals-are-now-unnecessary-chronic#sthash.8NE8nL9O.dpuf

Is There a Role for Vitamins in Cancer Prevention?



Heather Greenlee ND, PhD
Assistant Professor of Epidemiology
Mailman School of Public Health
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, NY


Is There a Role for Vitamins in Cancer Prevention?

August 9, 2013

Posted in: Cancer, Public Health

According to recent national surveys, approximately 40 percent of U.S. adults take multivitamins/multiminerals; many also take calcium, folic acid, vitamin D, and other specific vitamin and mineral supplements.

People take dietary supplements for multiple reasons: to prevent diseases, manage diseases, extend life, and promote general health. Some take supplements with the goal of preventing cancer occurrence or recurrence and of prolonging life after a cancer diagnosis.

The question that people want answered is: Do these supplements work?

Historically, there has always been a quest to find an elixir or “magic bullet” that will stave off disease and promote long life, and in times when nutrient deficiencies were common, vitamin supplementation may have been a valuable public health strategy. However, now that the U.S. food supply is largely fortified with folic acid, iodine, niacin, and vitamin D, this rationale may be less appropriate.

If some of these supplements are effective, which ones are they? What is the appropriate/ necessary dose? And how long must you take the vitamin to see an effect?

Unfortunately, for vitamin/mineral proponents, if we look at data from human studies, we see limited support for the use of vitamins/minerals to broadly prevent cancer.
No Clear Benefit, Some Evidence of Harm

Numerous observational studies (studies in which the study participants were not asked to change their behavior) and clinical trials have shown limited or no benefits from supplemental vitamins and minerals.

In the past, these results provided sufficient evidence to say that at least the supplements were not harmful, even if they provided no specific benefit. However, more recent reports have suggested that some forms of vitamins and minerals may be harmful.

Investigators from the Iowa Women’s Health Study, an observational study of more than 38,000 older women, found that several commonly used vitamin and mineral supplements (multivitamins, vitamin B6, folic acid, iron, magnesium, zinc, and copper) were associated with increased total mortality. This was surprising, as there was little prior evidence suggesting harm.

Our group recently reported on data from the observational Life After Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) study, which suggested that among women with breast cancer who were primarily recruited at Kaiser-Permanente of Northern California, the use of dietary supplements with carotenoids may increase overall mortality, whereas the use of other forms of antioxidants (vitamin C, vitamin E) may be associated with a protective effect (though this may not be real and could be explained by the “healthy user” bias). The most important implication of these results was that different types of antioxidant supplements may have effects.

None of these results stands on its own; all of them need to be replicated in other studies. We must interpret study results and infer causation in light of other data. If, for example, we look at the literature on the use of carotenoid supplements for cancer prevention, we see that there are other trials that have shown harm and that few, if any, have shown any benefit related to cancer prevention.
No Magic Bullet

Clinical trials are our gold standard for testing agents of interest. The SELECT trial was a randomized controlled trial of vitamin E and selenium for prostate cancer prevention among healthy men. While neither supplement prevented prostate cancer, the results suggested that vitamin E increased the risk of prostate cancer.

The most recent vitamin trial to receive attention was the Physicians’ Health Study II, a randomized controlled trial that included more than 14,000 male U.S. physicians 50 years or older. The men were randomized to take either a daily multivitamin or a placebo. The study found that for men taking the multivitamin, there was an 8 percent reduction in total cancer incidence, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer.

However, there was no difference in overall deaths between the two groups. These results raise the question: From the public health perspective, if multivitamin use decreased cancer incidence but did not decrease overall deaths, what would be the benefit to encourage men to take multivitamins?

These studies are just a few among the many observational and clinical trials that have failed to reveal the magic bullet that will prevent cancer and extend life among the general population. The studies also show the potential for harm with these agents. Additional ongoing studies of supplemental vitamin D, fish oils, and other agents will reveal whether they would be beneficial on the population level.
Focus on Diet, Exercise, Not Supplements

A current approach to cancer prevention trials is to ask whether specific populations may benefit from dietary supplements. For example, vitamin D may be of benefit to individuals with low levels of vitamin D due to darker skin pigmentation or low sun exposure. From a global perspective, individuals with environmental exposures, such as arsenic in groundwater wells in Bangladesh, may benefit from folic acid supplementation to decrease the carcinogenic effects of arsenic. But such supplementation is beneficial to targeted populations—not broadly applicable to all people.

Where does that leave us? Both the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) clearly state in their clinical guidelines that current evidence does not support the use of any dietary supplements for primary cancer prevention or for the prevention of cancer recurrence.

What should we do? Until we have evidence to suggest otherwise, we can follow the other cancer prevention recommendations from both the ACS and AICR. 1) Eat a diet rich in vegetables and fruits, high in whole grains, and low in processed and energy-dense foods; if your diet is nutritionally balanced, you probably don’t need a multivitamin. 2) Be physically active every day. 3) Maintain a lean body.

If you do feel compelled to take dietary supplements, understand what you are taking, why you think it may be beneficial, and what risks may be involved. Finally, understand that a supplement should never be viewed as a sole means of cancer prevention.

This article originally appeared in NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital’s Cancer Prevention Newsletter.

Physicians infrequently adhere to hepatitis vaccination guidelines for chronic liver disease

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 26;8(7):e71124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071124. Print 2013.

Physicians infrequently adhere to hepatitis vaccination guidelines for chronic liver disease

Thudi K, Yadav D, Sweeney K, Behari J.

Source
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Abstract
BACKGROUND AND GOALS:
Hepatitis A (HAV) and hepatitis B (HBV) vaccination in patients with chronic liver disease is an accepted standard of care. We determined HAV and HBV vaccination rates in a tertiary care referral hepatology clinic and the impact of electronic health record (EHR)-based reminders on adherence to vaccination guidelines.

METHODS:
We reviewed the records of 705 patients with chronic liver disease referred to our liver clinic in 2008 with at least two follow-up visits during the subsequent year. Demographics, referral source, etiology, and hepatitis serology were recorded. We determined whether eligible patients were offered vaccination and whether patients received vaccination. Barriers to vaccination were determined by a follow-up telephone interview.

RESULTS:
HAV and HBV serologic testing prior to referral and at the liver clinic were performed in 14.5% and 17.7%; and 76.7% and 74% patients, respectively. Hepatologists recommended vaccination for HAV in 63% and for HBV in 59.7% of eligible patients. Patient demographics or disease etiology did not influence recommendation rates. Significant variability was observed in vaccination recommendation amongst individual providers (30-98.6%), which did not correlate with the number of patients seen by each physician. Vaccination recommendation rates were not different for Medicare patients with hepatitis C infection for whom a vaccination reminder was automatically generated by the EHR. Most patients who failed to get vaccination after recommendation offered no specific reason for noncompliance; insurance was a barrier in a minority.

CONCLUSIONS:
Hepatitis vaccination rates were suboptimal even in an academic, sub-speciality setting, with wide-variability in provider adherence to vaccination guidelines.

Introduction
Hepatitis A and hepatitis B are amongst the most common infectious diseases worldwide [1], [2]. Superinfection with hepatitis A virus (HAV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with underlying chronic liver disease is associated with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality [3], [4], [5]. Both HAV and HBV infections are preventable by highly effective and safe vaccines [6], [7], [8], [9]. Experts have recommended screening for susceptibility to HAV and HBV infection and vaccination against them for all patients with chronic liver disease [10], [11]. The CDC and several professional societies have also recommended vaccination against HAV and HBV for susceptible patients with chronic liver disease. In 2008, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed HAV and HBV vaccination for eligible patients with chronic hepatitis C infection (HCV) as a quality measure [12], [13], [14], [15].

Prior studies have demonstrated shortcomings in adherence to vaccination guidelines in specific subgroups of patients with chronic liver disease in the United States and around the world. In a study of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection in a Veterans Administration Healthy System in California, an adherence rate of 71% for HAV and 70% for HBV and 62% for both vaccination was found [16]. Similarly, in a large cohort of HCV patients from the Department of Veterans Affairs quality measure of HAV and HBV vaccination or documentation of immunity were met in just 57% and 45.5% patients, respectively [17]. A study of patients with autoimmune hepatitis from Germany found vaccination rates of just 11% for HBV and 13% for HAV [18].

Given the increased focus on preventive care and advent of pay for performance models of health care delivery, it likely that adherence to vaccination guideline will be emphasized as a quality measure. Low adherence to vaccination guidelines in primary care settings has been documented [19]. However, limited data are available on whether specialists that care for chronic liver disease patients perform better on these quality measures than community physicians [19]. Furthermore, it is also unknown whether adoption of electronic health records (EHR) and introduction of CMS-mandated quality measures reporting has affected physician practice patterns in terms of adhering to hepatitis vaccination guidelines.

Therefore, the objectives of this study were: (1) To evaluate adherence to hepatitis vaccination guidelines in patients with chronic liver disease at a tertiary care hepatology clinic, (2) to identify barriers to vaccinations in patients with chronic liver disease, and (3) to determine physician variability in adherence to vaccination guidelines......

Continue To Full Text Available @ PLoS One.

UK-Doing the maths to cut Hepatitis C in injecting drug users

Doing the maths to cut Hepatitis C in injecting drug users

Source - The Conversation

Authors

Natasha Martin Research
Associate at University of Bristol


Matthew Hickman
Professor in Public Health and Epidemiology at University of Bristol


Hepatitis C is a blood borne virus and a major cause of liver disease and liver cancer. Around 150m people globally are estimated to suffer from the virus and in the UK, and many developed countries, people who inject drugs are at the biggest risk.

Of the 150,000 people with chronic hepatitis C in the UK, over 85% are current or former intravenous drug users. And about 40% of people who inject drugs are chronically infected with Hep C, compared to only 1% infected with HIV.

To prevent Hep C and its related liver disease, it’s clear we need to manage and prevent the disease among people who inject drugs.

Traditional harm reduction interventions

Currently, programmes to prevent Hep C transmission among people who inject drugs generally centre on needle and syringe schemes, which increases use of sterile equipment and lowers the risk of needle sharing, and opiate substitution treatment, which can reduce how often someone injects.

In the UK there has been considerable investment in both harm reduction measures – and it’s estimated that about half of injecting drug users may be on one intervention or the other. And evidence on the effectiveness of these strategies suggest that either can reduce Hep C transmission by about 50%, but combining them could reduce Hep C risk by 80%.

Our previous modelling work suggests that scaling up traditional harm reduction interventions can reduce the Hep C burden among people who inject drugs. For example, if current harm reduction measures] were removed, then over 80% of these drug users could have been chronically infected with Hep C, instead of the 40% seen today.

However, chronic Hep C in the UK remains high – and recent trends have not fallen – so it’s clear that we need to urgently find a new way of tackling the problem.
Hep C treatment as prevention

Effective treatments to cure Hep C do exist and are effective in about 60% of cases. These could also be used for prevention. Our model projections show that scaling up antiviral treatment for Hep C could reduce transmission. In some circumstances treating people who inject drugs would be more cost-effective than treating non or ex-drug users.

Making a maximum impact

In a recent study published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, we also assessed the potential impact of combining Hep C interventions – traditional harm reduction programmes (opiate substitution therapy, needle and syringe programmes) and antiviral treatment. Our projections suggest that rapid and substantial reduction in Hep C prevalence among people who inject drugs isn’t possible using traditional harm reduction measures alone, but is feasible when combined with antiviral treatment.

In general, we found that increasing coverage of traditional harm reduction programmes by 20% reduces the number of antiviral treatments required to achieve a given aim by about 30%. To halve the prevalence of chronic Hep C within ten years in a population where it is currently 40%, for example, would require treating 38 injecting drug users per 1000 each year. But if coverage of preventative measures were increased by 40%, to achieve the same reduction would require 23 users to be treated per 1000.

It’s expensive to cure Hep C

Current Hep C drugs cost about US$15,000 (£9,700) per treatment course. Newer Hep C drugs could increase cure rates over 90% but will be incredibly expensive – likely to be more than US$50,000 (£32,000) per treatment course. Few intravenous drug users are treated with antivirals. Some doctors are reluctant because they’re concerned that the drug users they treat won’t stick to antivirals, or because of the possibility of reinfection through further intravenous drug use.

In contrast the cost of delivering opiate substitution treatment has been estimated at about $10–$15 per day (£7-£10) and high-coverage needle and syringe programmes can cost $500 (£325) per year.

Strategies that increase prevention to minimise the number of antiviral Hep C treatments is likely to be seen as a more efficient use of resources. And especially as they bring other benefits including reducing the risk of HIV and bacterial infections. Opiate substitution treatment in particular reduces drug-related deaths and crime and promotes a better quality of life.

Limiting factors

Our work supports current European recommendations on Hep C prevention and a combined approach for maximum impact.

But there is a limit to the math. Our model projections explain the why but not the how: empirical evidence on how best to scale-up antiviral treatment, target injecting drug users who are future Hep C transmitters, and combine Hep C treatment with other interventions. Or indeed, how best to manage the cost of expensive antivirals and how they could best be used.

It might be that affordability prevents more use of antivirals. But we’re some way further to understanding why combining interventions might prove more effective in tackling the Hep C epidemic in the long run.

University of Bristol provides funding as a Founding Partner of The Conversation.
bristol.ac.uk

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Sustained virological response after treatment in chronic hepatitis C - five year follow up

Sustained virological response after treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection - a five year follow up

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v39i1.15791

Rahman MZ1, Ahmed DS1, Masud H1, Parveen S2, Rahman MA1, Chowdhury MS1, Barua R1, Ishaque SM1 1Department of Gastroenterology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, 2Department of Paediatrics, BSMMU, Dhaka.

Vol 39, No 1 (2013)

Abstract
Peginterferon α-2a and ribavirin combination therapy achieves a sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Little is know about long-term durability of hepatitis C virus – Ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) negativity in patient treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy.

Aim of this study was to evaluate the durability of virologic response in patients with SVR to anti-viral therapy treated at our centre. A total of 52 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection who had obtained SVR after Peginterferon α-2a and ribavirin combination therapy were followed up to 5 years with annual HCV-RNA testing. During this follow up period, 4 of 52 patients with initial SVR developed late relapse of hepatitis C virus infection. Relapse was more common in patients who has cirrhosis (3/6 [50%]) vs (1/46 [2.17%]) without cirrhosis.

In conclusion, SVR is durable in most patients, but some patients do have late relapse; long term follow up may be particularly important in a subset of patients with hepatitis C virus infection who have liver cirrhosis.

Discussion Only
Full text available here, or Download PDF file here

Infection with hepatitis C virus is a leading cause of liver disease worldwide1,2. Progression to chronic hepatitis C occurs in most people acutely infected with HCV and persistent infection is an important cause of cirrhosis, end stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, early detection and treatment is of great importance. The goal of treatment is to prevent complications of HCV infection3,4.

There have been substantial improvements in the success of HCV treatment and there are currently several treatment regimens approved by the FDA. In randomized clinical trials, the highest overall SVR rated have been achieved with the combination of weekly subcuataneous injection of long acting peginterferon α-2a and daily oral ribavirin, which represents the current standard of care12-14. Nevertheless, little is known on the outcome of patients treated with PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy.

Recently, swain et al. evaluated the durability of SVR after the treatment with peginterferon α-2a ± ribavirin in 845 patients, who had participated in pivotal trials15 and achieved SVR.

Only in seven patients (<1%), HCV-RNA was detected (after 391-1076 days of treatment). All these data indicate that the late relapse after SVR in chronic hepatitis C patients following anIFN-based anti-viral therapy is rare16-19.

This is the first study from Bangladesh on long term outcomes of anti-viral therapy for chronicHCV infection.

Our study shows that SVR is durable in a majority of patients but late relapses do occur. These relapses occur more commonly in patients with cirrhosis. Our study revealed late relapses in 7.69% over 5 year follow up. One reason for high late relapse in our study could be due to presence of poor baseline predictors of response: obesity i.e., BMI>30 (n=3), alcohol intake (n=1) and cirrhosis (n=3). In addition, on retrospective analysis we found that mean dose of ribavirin and peginterferon used in these patients was suboptimal as dose reductions were required more frequently due to severe adverse effects.

A theoretical explanation for late relapse could be persistence of undetected occult hepatitis C virus in hepatocytes, PBMCs, lymphocytes or macrophages.

There are several limitations of the study. Liver biopsy was not done. So histological relapse could not be seen. Similarly, retesting of genotype/sequencing was not done and possibility of reinfection cannot be ruled out.

SVR once achieved is sustained in majority of patients. The treating hepatologist need to be aware of occurrence of late relapses in patients with chronic HCV infection with cirrhosis.

Full Text - Download this PDF file


Of Interest - July 2013
Durability of sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C.

Scientists Use Genome Sequencing to Prove Herbal Remedy Causes Upper Urinary Tract Cancers

Scientists Use Genome Sequencing to Prove Herbal Remedy Causes Upper Urinary Tract Cancers

Release Date: 08/07/2013

DNA mutation "signature" identified in cancers linked to birthwort herb

Genomic sequencing experts at Johns Hopkins partnered with pharmacologists at Stony Brook University to reveal a striking mutational signature of upper urinary tract cancers caused by aristolochic acid, a plant compound contained in herbal remedies used for thousands of years to treat a variety of ailments such as arthritis, gout and inflammation. Their discovery is described in the Aug. 7 issue of Science Translational Medicine.

Aristolochic [pronounced a-ris-to-lo-kik] acid is found in the plant family "Aristolochia," a vine known widely as birthwort, and while the U.S. Food and Drug Administration first warned of its cancer-causing potential in 2001, botanical products and herbal remedies containing it can still be purchased online. Moreover, the vine has been found to be an environmental carcinogen through the contamination of food supplies of farming villages in the Balkans, where Aristolochia grows wildly in the local wheat fields. For years, scientists have known of some mutations in upper urinary tract cancer patients exposed to the plant toxin. But the genome-wide spectrum of mutations associated with aristolochic acid exposure remained largely unknown.

For the current study, the Johns Hopkins and Stony Brook team used whole-exome sequencing on 19 Taiwanese upper urinary tract cancer patients exposed to aristolochic acid, and seven patients with no suspected exposure to the toxin. The technique scours the exome, part of the human genome that contains codes for functional proteins and can reveal particular mutations, in this case, those associated with cancer.

"Genome-wide sequencing has allowed us to tie aristolochic acid exposure directly to an individual getting cancer," Kenneth Kinzler, Ph.D., professor of oncology in the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center's Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics. "The technology gives us the recognizable mutational signature to say with certainty that a specific toxin is responsible for causing a specific cancer. Our hope is that using the more targeted whole-exome-sequencing process will provide the necessary data to guide public health decisions related to cancer prevention."

Specifically, Kinzler says they found an average of 753 mutations in each tumor from the toxin-exposed group compared with 91 in tumors from the non-exposed group. This level of mutation is more than that found in melanomas caused by ultraviolet radiation and lung cancer caused by smoking.

Members of the toxin-exposed group had a large number of a particular, rare type of mistake (a mutational signature) in the ATCG chemical code of their DNA. The predominant mutation type in the toxin-exposed tumors (72 percent) was an A substituted with a T. In one instance, the scientists used the mutational signature to uncover an artistolochic-related tumor in a patient who was unaware of prior exposure.

This study illustrates how genomic sequencing could also be used to pinpoint a culprit carcinogen in some cancer clusters, says Margaret L. Hoang, Ph.D., lead author of the study. Cancer clusters are defined as an unusually large number of similar cancers occurring within a specific group of people, geographic area or period of time.

The research was funded by the Virginia and DK Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research, the Commonwealth Foundation and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Scientists contributing to the work include: Margaret L. Hoang, Chung-Hsin Chen, Viktoriya S. Sidorenko, Jian He, Kathleen G.

Dickman, Byeong Hwa Yun, Masaaki Moriya, Noushin Niknafs, Christopher Douville, Rachel Karchin, Robert J. Turesky, Yeong-Shiau Pu, Bert Vogelstein, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Arthur P. Grollman and Thomas A. Rosenquist.

Institutions are: the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center's Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Stony Brook University, New York State Department of Health and the Division of Computational Medicine at The Johns Hopkins University.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration warning on artistolochic acid

Media Contacts:
Vanessa Wasta
410-614-2916, wasta@jhmi.edu
Amy Mone
410-614-2915, amone@jhmi.edu

Photo Credit - Aristolochia clematitis (European birthwort)
Christer Johansson via Wikimedia