Monday, November 1, 2010

Roche Two Fines/One For Pegasys:Monies Paid To Nurse/Health Service To Use Drug


Today from Australia the age.com Kate Hagan writes "DRUG company Roche has been fined $200,000 for offering to fund a nurse's position at a health service - depending on how many patients were treated with its hepatitis C drug Pegasys"

The drug company has two fines under (two different occasions) the Medicines Australia code of conduct for the maximum of 200,000 dollars . The other matter was for its renal anaemia treatment Mircerea, because the company made misleading claims.

As for Pegasys it was reported that a letter was sent to a health service which made an offer of funding that hinged on the number of patients treated with the drug. This funding was increased as more patients were treated.

Roche claimed that ''when [its] employees realised that the proposal could be construed in a way that was contrary to the code, it was withdrawn'', and there was no code broken.

Quoted from the age.com article;" the committee disagreed, finding the fact the offer was made was sufficient to breach the code, particularly its requirement that no inducements should be offered that could interfere with a health care professional's independence".

Roche didn't win and was ordered to send a correction letter to all professionals with passwords to Roches website.

http://www.theage.com.au/national/two-fines-for-drug-company-20101101-17aex.html

Hepatitis C Polymerase Inhibitor INX-189 Phase 1b Trial Announced

Inhibitex, Inc. (NASDAQ: INHX), announced today that it has initiated a Phase 1b, multiple ascending dose (MAD) clinical trial of INX-189, its nucleotide polymerase inhibitor in development for the treatment of chronic infections caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV). .

The trial, which is being conducted under an IND in the United States, is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and anti-viral activity of INX-189 administered orally once daily for seven days in treatment naïve patients with HCV genotype 1.

Each treatment cohort will include 10 patients, eight of which will receive INX-189 and two of which will receive placebo. The first cohort in the Phase 1b study will receive 9 mg of INX-189 once daily. In addition to evaluating INX-189 as monotherapy, the Company plans to evaluate two dose levels of INX-189 administered once daily for seven days in combination with ribavirin, which is one of the drugs currently approved for the treatment of HCV. The dose levels of INX-189 to be evaluated in combination with ribavirin will be determined based upon the results of the monotherapy cohorts.

“The initiation of this proof of concept study in patients with chronic hepatitis C marks an important milestone in the clinical development of INX-189”

"The initiation of this proof of concept study in patients with chronic hepatitis C marks an important milestone in the clinical development of INX-189," stated Dr. Joseph Patti, Senior Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of Inhibitex, Inc. "We believe that dosing INX-189 both as monotherapy and in combination with ribavirin in this study will enhance our ability to assess the anticipated anti-viral synergies of the two agents and allow us to better define the most appropriate doses of INX-189 to evaluate in future clinical trials."

Source: Inhibitex, Inc.

AASLD:Locteron/interferon,less adverse flu-like effects



Nov 01, 2010 09:09 ET

OctoPlus' licensee Biolex presents significant tolerability advantages of Locteron at AASLD conference today

Locteron Phase IIb results include statistically significant reduction of flu-like adverse events confirmed by two independent reporting methods

Biolex Presents at AASLD Meeting Significant Tolerability Advantages of Locteron®, Its Next-Generation Interferon for Hepatitis C
Locteron Phase 2b Results Include Statistically Significant Reduction of Flu-Like Adverse Events Confirmed by Two Independent Reporting Methods; Locteron's Tolerability and Dosing Advantages and Strong Efficacy Make It a Highly Combinable Interferon for Use With Future Direct-Acting Anti-Viral Combinations

PITTSBORO, NC--(Marketwire - November 1, 2010) - Biolex Therapeutics, Inc. today announced positive results from two Phase 2b trials further demonstrating the strong anti-viral response and tolerability advantages of the 480 µg dose of Locteron® in the treatment of hepatitis C. In the Phase 2b trials, patients directly reported flu-like adverse events on a daily basis through an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system, and the results demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the frequency and severity of flu-like adverse events and reduced use of concomitant (analgesic/antipyretic) medications for patients treated with Locteron compared to patients treated with the PEG-Intron® control. Locteron, controlled-release interferon alpha 2b, is designed to offer key advantages compared to currently marketed interferons as a core component of combination therapies for the treatment of hepatitis C. These advantages include reduced flu-like symptoms, reduced rates of depression, and a less frequent dosing regimen with half the number of injections. The "EMPOWER" Phase 2b ePRO results will be presented today in a late-breaker session at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) in Boston.

EMPOWER is a prospectively designed analysis of the combined results from two Phase 2b hepatitis C trials focusing on the 480 µg dose of Locteron (the middle dose of three Locteron doses evaluated in the two trials). Through 12 weeks of treatment, 50% of the patients in the Locteron 480 µg group achieved cEVR (undetectable HCV RNA) compared to 46% of the patients in the PEG-Intron group. As a result of its controlled-release mechanism, Locteron achieved strong efficacy results while being dosed half as frequently as PEG-Intron.

The AASLD presentation today includes for the first time results from the ePRO adverse-event reporting system where patients directly recorded their flu-like adverse events on a daily basis, providing greater insight into the patients' real world experiences with these side effects and the impact on their daily activities. In addition to the self-reporting by patients with the ePRO system, flu-like adverse events were also recorded using traditional weekly adverse event assessments performed by the clinical sites. Flu-like adverse events were predefined to include arthralgia, chills, fever, headache, and myalgia.

A substantial reduction in flu-like adverse events for patients treated with Locteron compared to PEG-Intron was evident even in the first week after initiation of treatment and continued through the 12-week time point through which the ePRO system was utilized. The reduction in flu-like adverse events during the week after the first injection supports the hypothesis that the slower rise to Cmax provided by the controlled-release mechanism of Locteron contributes to the tolerability advantages seen in multiple clinical trials. A comparison of the flu-like adverse event reporting by the clinical sites and by ePRO provide independent confirmation of the substantial benefits Locteron provided in reducing these side effects as outlined in the table below:


"The ePRO results being presented for the first time today are robust and provide important insight into the impact that flu-like adverse events have on patients' daily lives," said Patrick Marcellin, MD, PhD, Professor of Hepatology at the University of Paris and Head of the Viral Hepatitis Research Unit in Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy. "Treatment of hepatitis C is likely to progress to triple and quad therapies in which interferons are combined with one or more direct-acting anti-viral drugs. Locteron's advantages with regards to flu-like adverse events, depression and dosing frequency have the potential to enhance the overall tolerability of, and patient adherence to, these future combinations."

Consistent with the reduction in flu-like adverse events, less than half as many Locteron patients used concomitant medications (analgesics and antipyretics) compared to the usage of these medications by PEG-Intron patients during the study period as detailed below.



A comparison of the ePRO and clinic site reporting highlights the fact that flu-like adverse events may even be more important to patients than historically believed. The total flu-like adverse events reported directly by the patients using the ePRO system during the first 12 weeks of EMPOWER was more than four times greater than the total flu-like adverse events recorded by the clinical sites. Also of importance, patients rated 80% of their flu-like adverse events as moderate or severe in their ePRO reports, compared to the clinical site reporting in which only 13% of flu-like adverse events were rated as moderate or severe. Despite the apparent differences in sensitivity in the two adverse event reporting methods, the results from both the ePRO and weekly clinic visits independently confirm the reduction in flu-like adverse events for patients treated with Locteron compared to patients treated with PEG-Intron. Through the 12-weeks, the difference in flu-like adverse event counts was statistically significant when measured by both the ePRO and clinical site reporting methods (p < 0.001 for each). The relevance of flu-like adverse events was highlighted in a survey of hepatitis C patients published in the Journal of Viral Hepatitis in June 2010 in which depression and flu-like symptoms were cited as the two most important adverse events impacting patient adherence to treatment. Last week Biolex reported 48-week results from its SELECT-2 Phase 2b trial of Locteron demonstrating substantial reductions in depression compared to PEG-Intron. AASLD Presentation The EMPOWER ePRO and clinical-site tolerability results will be presented today by the lead author, Walker Long, MD, Chief Medical Officer and Vice President, Drug Development, Biolex Therapeutics, in the form of a poster titled "Adverse Event Reporting During HCV Treatment Via Weekly Clinic Visits Substantially Underestimates Flu Frequency & Severity Compared to Daily ePRO: Results From 133 Patients in EMPOWER." "The EMPOWER results are notable in that they show a statistically significant reduction of flu-like adverse events for Locteron confirmed by two sources, the clinical site assessments and the daily patient reporting of side effects through the ePRO System. The reductions in the percent of patients using analgesics and in overall analgesic use observed in the Locteron group provide additional support for improved tolerability on Locteron," said Dr. Long. "These results complement the positive results released last week from our SELECT-2 Phase 2b trial in which we showed statistically significant reductions in flu-like adverse events for three different Locteron doses, and substantial reductions in depression for the Locteron 480 and 320 µg doses." About EMPOWER Study The objective of the EMPOWER study was to test the hypothesis that the 480 µg dose of Locteron dosed once every two weeks reduces flu-like symptoms but retains equivalent efficacy compared to PEG-Intron (1.5 µg/kg, administered every week). The 133 patients in the EMPOWER study were enrolled in two contributing Phase 2b trials: SELECT-2, a Phase 2b dose-finding trial evaluating the 320, 480 or 640 µg doses of Locteron versus PEG-Intron. The 480 STUDY, a Phase 2b trial evaluating the 480 µg dose of Locteron versus PEG-Intron. All patients in both trials were treatment-naïve-genotype-1 subjects with chronic hepatitis C, and all patients were also treated with weight-based ribavirin. A total of 30 sites participated in the two trials (14 sites in the US, 11 in Europe, and five in Israel). Locteron Overview Locteron, controlled-release interferon alpha 2b, is designed to offer key advantages compared to currently approved products, including reduced flu-like symptoms and rates of depression, and cutting in half the number of injections required. In contrast to Locteron, the currently approved products, Pegasys® and PEG-Intron, are immediate-release products that lack a controlled-release mechanism. The two-drug combination of interferon alpha and ribavirin serves as the current standard of care for the treatment of hepatitis C. The launch of the first direct-acting anti-viral (DAA) product, projected for 2011, will transform treatment of genotype-1 patients to a triple-drug therapy (interferon plus ribavirin plus DAA) and substantially raise cure rates. Other recent triple or quad drug combinations with interferon (including interferon plus ribavirin plus two DAA agents) have shown promise in early clinical testing, further solidifying the continued role of interferon in the treatment of hepatitis C. It is estimated that worldwide sales of interferon products for the treatment of hepatitis C will approach $6 billion by 2016. Locteron incorporates an advanced controlled-release drug delivery technology that allows dosing once every two weeks, more convenient than Pegasys and PEG-Intron, each of which require dosing every week. More importantly, Locteron's controlled-release mechanism results in the gradual release of interferon alpha 2b to patients over the duration of two weeks and avoids the early peak plasma levels of the active interferon that characterize the pegylated interferons. This controlled-release mechanism is designed to reduce the frequency and severity of flu-like symptoms and depression commonly experienced by patients treated with pegylated interferons. Locteron is an investigational therapeutic candidate and has not been approved for sale by the United States Food and Drug Administration or by any international regulatory agency. About Biolex Therapeutics Biolex is a biopharmaceutical company that uses its patented LEX System(SM) to develop follow-on biologics, hard-to-make therapeutic proteins and to optimize monoclonal antibodies. The LEX System is a novel technology that genetically transforms the aquatic plant Lemna to enable the production of biologic product candidates. The company's product candidates are designed to provide best-in-class efficacy/tolerability profiles while incorporating proven mechanisms of action. Biolex's lead product candidate, Locteron®, is in Phase 2b clinical testing for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Biolex has also developed two other product candidates that capitalize on the benefits of the LEX System. BLX-155 is a direct-acting thrombolytic designed to dissolve blood clots in patients. BLX-301 is a humanized anti-CD20 antibody glyco-optimized for the treatment of non- Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma and other diseases.

Drug Therapy Okay for Pregnant Women With HBV

AASLD: Drug Therapy Okay for Pregnant Women With Hep B
By Kristina Fiore, Staff Writer, MedPage TodayPublished: October 31, 2010Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

BOSTON -- Pregnant women with active hepatitis B infection can be safely and effectively treated with telbivudine (Tyzeka), researchers said here.

A study involving more than 80 women found that just over half of the women given telbivudine achieved a complete virologic response right before delivery compared with none of the controls (P<0.001), according to Calvin Pan, MD, of Mount Sinai School of Medicine in Flushing, N.Y., and colleagues.

Additionally, a smaller proportion of babies born to women in the telbivudine group had surface antigens for hepatitis B virus compared with controls (4% versus 23%, P<0.001), the researchers reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD).

"I think this treatment is safe, and I support its use if the mother has active virus," Pan told MedPage Today.

There has been a controversy over whether pregnant women with hepatitis B should be treated, mainly due to concerns over the safety of the fetus.

Pan said this is the first randomized controlled trial to investigate drug safety and efficacy in pregnant women with active hepatitis B infection. Other case series have examined the question -- but no studies have been randomized and controlled.

To evaluate both virologic responses and safety parameters, Pan and colleagues assessed 88 pregnant women with active hepatitis B from their second or third trimester until four weeks postpartum.

A total of 53 women received 600 mg of telbivudine per day, while 35 women who refused drug treatment agreed to serve as controls.

All babies born to women in the study cohort also received 200 IU of hepatitis B immune globulin within 24 hours of birth to prevent the disease -- and were then vaccinated against the virus with the standard three-dose course at 0, 1, and 6 months.

The mean duration of treatment in the telbivudine group was 15 weeks and 100% were followed through the end of study, compared with 92% of the controls.

The researchers found that 53% of the telbivudine-treated women achieved complete virologic response prior to delivery, compared with none among the control group (P<0.001).

Four weeks after giving birth, 62% of the treated patients had a complete virologic response versus none of the controls (P<0.001).

As well, more women on treatment also had normalized alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels compared with controls (77% versus 29%, P<0.001).

Both groups appeared to have decreased levels of hepatitis B "e" antigen -- but the drop was higher for those women treated with telbivudine (98% versus 60%, P<0.001).

Pan explained that pregnant women with active hepatitis B can have natural clearance of the virus without treatment, but noted that the decrease in the treatment arm "was still significantly higher."

In terms of fetal outcomes, more babies born to mothers who weren't on treatment had hepatitis B surface antigens compared with those on treatment (23% versus 4%, P<0.001).

Pan added that newborn outcomes were examined in greater detail in a second study, which found that at birth 6.32% of babies born to telbivudine-treated women had surface antigen to the hepatitis B virus -- compared with 30.43% in the control arm (P<0.001).

There were no discontinuations of telbivudine treatment due to adverse events -- nor were there any congenital deformities four weeks postpartum in either group.

Also, there were no differences in terms of postpartum hemorrhage, gestational age, infant height and weight, or Apgar scores.

Arun Sanyal, MD, of Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Va., and president of AASLD, highlighted the findings during a press conference.

"Now we have more evidence," Sanyal said, "showing that it is possible with pharmacotherapy to reduce perinatal transmission and treat these women safely."

Pan said he had no disclosures.

Sanyal reported relationships with Takeda, Salix, Ikaria, Astellas, Exhalenz, Bayer Onyx, Norgine, Gore, Gilead, Intercept, and Roche.


Primary source: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Source reference:
Pan C, et al "A prospective open-label study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of telbivudine in HBeAg + chronic hepatitis B pregnant women" AASLD 2010; Abstract 364.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/AASLD/23068

Diabetes Meds Diminish Markers of Fatty Liver/AASLD

By Kristina Fiore, Staff Writer, MedPage TodayPublished: October 31, 2010Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

BOSTON -- One of the newer classes of diabetes medications -- the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists -- appears to mitigate fatty liver disease in people with type 2 diabetes, according to two studies reported here.

Separate studies of treatment with daily liraglutide (Victoza) or weekly exenatide (Bydureon) -- both GLP-1 agonists -- found that the drugs lowered levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) compared with other diabetes medications and placebo.

Both studies were reported in poster presentations at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD).

Fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis are common complications of type 2 diabetes.

GLP-1 analogues have been shown to improve hepatic steatosis and markers of liver inflammation in murine models, since insulin resistance is thought to play a role in the pathophysiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Other antidiabetic therapies -- including metformin and thiazolidinedione drugs, particularly pioglitazone (Actos) -- have shown promise in treating fatty liver disease, although thiazolidinediones are associated with weight gain.

The liraglutide investigators reported data from the LEAD-2 study, a 26-week phase III trial with a one-and-a-half year open-label extension.

LEAD-2 patients received the GLP-1 agonist liraglutide (at a dose of 1.8, 1.2, or 0.6 mg/day), or glimepiride 4 mg/day or a placebo -- all in combination with metformin 1.5 or 2 g/day.

DEXA and computed tomography (CT) scans were used to measure body fat composition and hepatic steatosis, which was defined by a liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio less than one.

At baseline, 65.7% of the LEAD-2 patients had steatosis and 74% had metabolic syndrome, according to M.J. Armstrong, MD, of the University of Birmingham in England, and colleagues.

The LEAD-2 researchers found that patients with elevated ALT levels at baseline had a significant reduction from baseline with liraglutide (-8.53, P<0.0001).

This was a significant improvement over glimepiride -- 37% of patients on liraglutide had normalized ALT compared with 21% of those on glimepiride (P<0.05).

The effect of liraglutide on ALT appears to be independent of improvements in glycemic control, Armstrong and colleagues reported.

They also found that the liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio significantly increased with liraglutide, indicating reduced hepatic steatosis compared with both glimepiride and placebo (P<0.05).

The LEAD-2 investigators concluded that liraglutide reduces markers of liver inflammation and hepatic steatosis in patients with type 2 diabetes, but noted that the effects are dose-dependent -- results with 1.8 mg/day weren't as dramatic or significant as for the 1.2 mg or 0.6 mg daily doses.

In a second poster, Naga P. Chalasani, MD, of Indiana University in Indianapolis, and colleagues reported that weekly exenatide -- which was recently denied FDA approval -- also improved markers of fatty liver disease in diabetes patients.

Chalasani's group looked at pooled data from one 30-week and two 26-week trials totaling 541 patients with type 2 diabetes.

ALT was elevated at baseline in 60% of the study population.

The researchers saw a decrease in ALT among patients on exenatide, compared with a slight rise among those in the placebo group (-18.3% versus 2.1%).

Just over 13% of exenatide patients with elevated baseline levels achieved at least a 50% reduction in ALT, Chalasani and colleagues reported.

Levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) also improved among the exenatide patents, the researchers noted.

Chalasani's group added that the reduction in ALT was mildly correlated to a reduction in weight.

They concluded that weekly exenatide improved markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes "likely because of its combined effects on ALT, weight, and other cardiometabolic risk factors."

Armstrong reported relationships with the Wellcome Trust.

The liraglutide study was supported by Novo Nordisk.

Chalasani reported relationships with Johnson & Johnson, Debiovision, Advanced Life Sciences, Eli Lilly, Teva, Atherogenics, Amylin, Salix, Abbott, Karobio, Genentech, Medpace, Phenomix, and Gilead.

The exenatide trial was sponsored by Amylin.


Primary source: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases meeting
Source reference:
Chalasani NP, et al "Effect of once-weekly exenatide on ALT cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with type 2 diabetes" AASLD 2010; Abstract 661.

Additional source: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Source reference:
Armstrong MJ, et al "Effects of two years of liraglutide treatment on fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: Analysis of the LEAD-2 extension trial" AASLD 2010; Abstract 625.

http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/AASLD/23070

AASLD: HBV New Target for HIV Drug

By Michael Smith, North American Correspondent, MedPage TodayPublished: October 31, 2010Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco

BOSTON -- A drug widely used to treat HIV infection -- tenofovir (Viread) -- may become a "new friend" for physicians treating chronic hepatitis B, researchers reported here.

A multicenter European cohort study using the nucleotide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) tenofovir found that the drug appears to be safe and effective for treating hepatitis B, according to Pietro Lampertico, MD, of the University of Milan, and colleagues.

It was especially useful among hep B patients not previously exposed to an NRTI, Lampertico told the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Lampertico was reporting interim results of a planned five-year analysis of 737 chronic hepatitis B patients treated with tenofovir at 17 European centers.

"We think it is very important to generate data about early clinical practice" because patients in clinical trials are often not representative of all patients with the disease, Lampertico told MedPage Today.

Tenofovir was approved in 2008 both in Europe and the U.S. for treating hepatitis B, but it has long been a mainstay of therapy for HIV. "It's an old friend for those in HIV, but it's a new friend for us," Lampertico said.

To see how well the drug performs in the real world of clinical practice, Lampertico and colleagues studied all patients -- except those with HIV coinfection -- who were put on the drug in each of the 17 centers. The main outcomes of the analysis were undetectable hepatitis B DNA and renal and tubular function.

The patients were stratified according to their previous exposure to NRTIs -- 71% were previously exposed and 29% were NTRI-naive, Lampertico reported.

Median follow-up was 16 months -- but in some cases it was as long as 52 months.

In the NRTI-naive patients, response rates rose over time, reaching 89% at 48 weeks, Lampertico reported. On the other hand, he said, the time to a response was significantly affected (at P<0.0001) by baseline viral load and some patients with extremely high viremia at the start of treatment did not achieve a response.

Indeed, at 48 weeks, 17 patients still had only a partial response, with a median residual viral load of 2.5 log10 international units per mL of serum.

In the previously treated patients, Lampertico said, those who had undetectable viremia on their previous regimen -- most on adefovir (Hepsera) -- continued to have undetectable viremia on tenofovir. Among those who had developed resistance on their previous regimen, 74% became undetectable on tenofovir.

The proportion of patients with impaired renal or tubular function was relatively small, Lampertico said, but those with previous exposure to adefovir were more likely to have low blood phosphorous levels and urinary phosphate absorption.

About 6% of patients had their tenofovir dose reduced because of reduced creatinine clearance, Lampertico said, but most of them were over 60, had previous exposure to adefovir, and had comorbid conditions with the potential to affect kidney function.

"There's a very good safety performance in naive patients," he said, "but in the experienced patients, we may see a few problems."

But he cautioned that the results -- while encouraging -- are provisional and may change as the study continues.

The analysis is "confirmatory and reassuring" that tenofovir works well in clinical practice, not just in trials, according to Arun Sanyal, MD, of Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center in Richmond, Va. Sanyal, president of the AASLD, who was not part of the study.

"People are very interested in knowing what the gap is between outcomes in clinical trials and in real life," he told MedPage Today. "Clearly, it's a good antiviral agent."

But Sanyal added that the safety signal for tenofovir-exposed patients seen by Lampertico and colleagues needs more analysis. "We need more focused studies using state-of-the-art measures of renal injury," he said. That's an "important future direction," he concluded.

The study had no external support.

Lampertico reported financial links with Gilead, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis.

Sanyal reported financial links with Takeda, Salix, Ikaria, Exhalenz, Bayer Onyx, Norgine, Gore, Gilead, Intercept, Roche and Astellas.


Primary source: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Source reference:
Lampertico P, et al "Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in field practice: a multicenter European cohort study of 737 patients with chronic hepatitis B" AASLD 2010; Abstract 369.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/AASLD/23071

HCV Tx Cuts Deaths Post-Transplant/AASLD

By Michael Smith, North American Correspondent, MedPage TodayPublished: October 31, 2010Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

BOSTON -- After a liver transplant, successful treatment for hepatitis C significantly reduces the risk of death, researchers reported here.

The finding, from a retrospective analysis of nearly 500 patients from 12 Italian liver transplant centers, suggests that antiviral treatment should be "strongly pursued," according to Maria Rendina, MD, of the University of Bari in Bari, Italy and colleagues.

Many physicians are reluctant to treat the recurrent disease aggressively because of a perceived lack of clinical effect and because of frequent adverse events, Rendina said at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

But in this study population, she said, the lack of a sustained virologic response (SVR) -- defined as undetectable viral RNA 24 weeks after the end of treatment -- was "significantly and independently" associated with a threefold increased risk of death.

All told, Rendina's group studied outcomes for 464 consecutive liver transplant patients who were treated after their hepatitis C recurred. Over a median follow-up of six years, Rendina said, 35% of the patients achieved an SVR and most maintained the response throughout the study period.

But mortality was significantly lower among those with an SVR. In addition, she noted:

Only 10% of those who were successfully treated died, including only one from liver-related causes.
In contrast, 34% of those who did not achieve an SVR died, including 89 (or 28%) from liver-related causes.
The difference was significant at P=0.001, but there was no significant difference in the rate of death from non-liver related causes.

Rendina said univariate analysis showed that older donor age, diabetes, having viral genotypes one or four, and lack of an SVR were all significant risk factors for death.

In a multivariate analysis, the lack of an SVR was associated with a significant hazard ratio for death of 3.3, she added.

Rendina noted that current treatments for hepatitis C (interferon, whether pegylated or standard, combined with ribavirin) are difficult to tolerate -- indeed, she reported 26% of the patients in the current analysis stopped treatment.

"New antivirals are urgently needed," she said.

The findings "extend the whole idea that if you have an SVR you actually improve mortality," according to Arun Sanyal, MD, of Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center in Richmond, Va. Sanyal, president of AASLD, who was not part of the study.

Sanyal said data from the nontransplant population -- some presented at this meeting -- show that an SVR is associated with lower risk of death.

The Italian study, he said, shows that "post-transplant, if you knock the virus out then it really has a huge impact on liver-related death."

Taken together, the data "makes a really compelling case than an SVR really does represent a cure," Sanyal added.

The study may increase interest in treating more post-transplant patients, he commented, although the question of when to treat remains up in the air.

Rendina did not report any external support for the study. She said she had no financial disclosures.


Primary source: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Source reference:
Rendina M, et al "SVR to antiviral therapy is highly protective against liver -- related death in patients with HCV recurrence on the graft after liver transplantation (LT)" AASLD 2010; Abstract 4.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/AASLD/23072

AASLD:Human Cells Grow on Animal Liver Scaffolds

By Kristina Fiore, Staff Writer, MedPage
TodayPublished: October 31, 2010
Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD;
Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine,
University of California, San Francisco

BOSTON -- Researchers reported here that they have pared down animal livers to their basic vascular structure and repopulated them with human liver progenitor and endothelial cells -- taking a small step toward ultimately creating completely bioartificial livers.

After a week in a bioreactor, human liver cells placed onto this liver "scaffolding" began to express signature proteins such as albumin, and the endothelial cells expressed von Willebrand factor -- clues that the cells were functioning normally, according to Pedro Baptista, PhD, PharmD, of Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C., and colleagues.

Baptista reported the group's findings during an oral session at the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases meeting.

"We're looking into organ scaffolding because it offers a vascular system, and you can't really tissue engineer an organ without a vascular system," Baptista told MedPage Today.

"It's amazing because the cells recognize the chemistry of the matrix on their own and localize and attach in what we think are their native niches -- the endothelial cells attach to vascular structures and the hepatocytes attach in more parenchymal areas," he added.

Yet Baptista cautioned that the work is still very preliminary and his group is currently working on increasing the percentage of organ that gets repopulated with cells -- which currently stands at about 30%.

The purpose of creating bioartificial livers is to mitigate the organ donor shortage -- a persistent and growing problem in the U.S. During his talk, Baptista said the most recent statistics show that 109,000 people are awaiting organ transplants, 16,000 of whom are waiting for a donor liver.

Generating a liver scaffold has been done in the past -- and the technique can also be applied to other organs including the kidney and lungs -- but the organs had only been repopulated with animal cells.

To test the ability of growing human cells on these animal matrices, the researchers removed all existing cells from ferret livers with a detergent solution (Triton X-100 with a bit of ammonium hydroxide) to wash away cellular components such as membranes, nucleic acids, and cellular proteins.

That left behind an extracellular matrix that retains most of its microarchitecture, Baptista explained.

Next, the group seeded 70 million human liver progenitor cells and 30 million endothelial cells onto the matrix through the portal vein or vena cava, and left the organs in a bioreactor for a week.

During that time they found that the endothelial cells attached to the existing vascular channels, and the liver progenitor cells clustered throughout the bioscaffolding.

Baptista said that the "seeding is not quite there" at a 30% level, but his group is now looking at increasing the number of human cells initially infused -- perhaps to 300 or 400 million instead of 100 million.

The results still show, however, that the liver scaffold is biocompatible and can provide a sufficient substrate.

"It shows the cells are really able to recognize the native tissues and attach and engraft in those selected tissues," he said.

In fact, the liver cells were excreting higher levels of signature proteins including albumin and urea, and the endothelial cells expressed higher levels of von Willebrand factor and nitric oxide than comparator cells grown in Petri dishes, Baptista said.

He said a next step is to transplant the new organs back into animals to measure function and survival.

Another group, from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, which presented its findings during a poster session at the AASLD meeting, used the same scaffolding technology and retransplanted the livers back into rats.

They found similar 30% function in the new organs, but the transplanted animals only survived for eight hours, Basak Uygun, PhD, told MedPage Today.

She said in an interview that her team used large doses of blood thinner to prevent the clotting that's typical when a scaffolded organ is reperfused, which may have had an effect on mortality.

But when the livers remained outside of the animals, they functioned well for 24 hours but were not followed-up longer, she added.

The next step is to reperfuse greater than 30% of the matrix with functioning cells, Uygun added.

Arun Sanyal, MD, of Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center in Richmond, Va., and president of the AASLD, remarked that the findings of both groups "are in a very early stage, but they provide proof-of-concept that you can take these extracellular matrices and create functioning artificial livers."

"It's very interesting even though these are emerging technologies," Sanyal added.

Baptista said he can't forecast when these bioartificial organs would be available for use in the general population, though he predicted porcine livers would be good candidates for providing the extracellular matrices for human transplants.

In the meantime, he said the engineered livers could be used for drug discovery and development.

"I hope in the future," Baptista said, "there will be some type of bioengineered livers that will be suitable for transplant."

Baptista and Uygun said they had no disclosures.

The Wake Forest University work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology.


Primary source: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Source reference:
Baptista PM, et al "The use of whole organ decellularization for the bioengineering of a human vascularized liver" AASLD 2010; Abstract 12.

Additional source: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases meeting
Source reference:
Uygyn BE, et al "Engineering of a transplantable liver graft" AASLD 2010; Abstract 293.


http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/AASLD/23073