Friday, January 18, 2019

NHS England’s plan to eliminate Hepatitis C decisively backed by High Court

NHS England’s plan to eliminate Hepatitis C in England by 2025 is on track after all aspects of a High Court challenge by pharmaceutical company AbbVie were dismissed.
18 January 2019
The NHS’s single largest medicines procurement, a deal worth almost £1 billion over five years, was launched in April last year but contract start dates had to be delayed by six months after legal action by AbbVie.

The High Court today handed down the judgment decisively backing NHS England’s plans to eliminate Hepatitis C.

In the ruling, the judge rejected all challenges brought by AbbVie against NHS England’s smart procurement for the supply of curative, direct acting antiviral treatments and industry backed projects to find and treat people with the virus as quickly as possible.

John Stewart, director of specialised commissioning at NHS England, said: “Court cases such as this are a waste of NHS resources and taxpayers’ money, in this case resulting in an unavoidable delay in our efforts to tackle the threat of Hepatitis C, which disproportionately affects some of the most vulnerable and marginalised people in society.

“We remain committed to driving best value to help eliminate Hepatitis C in England by 2025 or sooner, and with this court case behind us we can now get on with the job.”

Hepatitis C is a cancer-causing infectious disease, spread by contact with an infected person’s blood.

In recent years, Public Health England estimated that around 160,000 people are infected with Hepatitis C in England, although around half are unaware of their infection.

The disease, which can go undetected until the liver becomes damaged, can now be successfully cured in weeks using new oral tablets.

In 2015, NHS England established 22 Operational Delivery Networks (ODNs) to support treatment and testing efforts across the country and over 32,000 patients have been treated so far with around 95% being cured of the disease. NHS England plans to eliminate Hepatitis C in England by 2025, five years earlier than World Health Organisation goals.

The Hepatitis C procurement is the latest in a series of ‘smart deals’ the NHS has delivered to drive value for the taxpayer and benefits for patients.

These include a £300 million saving after negotiating deals with five manufacturers on low cost versions of the health service’s most costly drug, adalimumab; striking the first full access deal in Europe for CAR-T therapy which can potentially cure some children and adults with blood cancers where other treatments have failed; and reaching a deal to make the life-extending lung cancer drug pembrolizumab, available for routine use on the NHS.

Thursday, January 17, 2019

After The Cure: What’s Next? Hepatitis C Post-Treatment Management

Listen to experts discuss important HCV related topics in the following easy to access webinar series provided by HepCure.

Achieved SVR, What’s Next? HCV Post-Treatment Management
This month Dr. Anthony Martinez of University at Buffalo presented; Achieved SVR, What’s Next? HCV Post-Treatment Management. 

Topics Discussed
1. Define sustained virologic response (SVR).
2. Describe how to manage cirrhotic patients post-SVR
3. Discuss at-risk populations for HCV reinfection

Begin here.....

View All Presentations

Recommended Reading 
AASLD-IDSA Hepatitis C Guidance:
Monitoring Patients Who Are Starting HCV Treatment, Are on Treatment, or Have Completed Therapy
Post-Treatment Follow-Up for Patients Who Achieved a Sustained Virologic Response
Patients who have undetectable HCV RNA in the serum, as assessed by a sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, ≥12 weeks after treatment completion are deemed to have achieved SVR. In these patients, HCV-related liver injury stops, although they remain at risk for non-HCV–related liver disease, such as fatty liver disease or alcoholic liver disease. Patients with cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis remain at risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Continue reading...….

May 2017 Gastroenterology
American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Practice Update—Expert Review: Care of Patients Who Have Achieved a Sustained Virologic Response After Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection
Ira M. Jacobson, Joseph K. Lim, Michael W. Fried

Full-text - Download PDF

Background and Objective
With the advent of safe and highly effective DAAs, cure of HCV infection has become more frequent. On the basis of randomized and observational studies, systematic reviews, and expert opinion, the authors of this clinical practice update present key recommendations about whether, when, and how long HCV patients who have achieved SVR should receive ongoing liver care.

Key Points
Confirm long-term virologic response at 48 weeks posttreatment. This recommendation is based on clinical trial results that have identified a late-relapse rate of ±0.5%. However, further confirmation of virologic response beyond 48 weeks posttreatment is not supported by the available evidence.

For patients with stage 3 fibrosis or liver cirrhosis, continue post-SVR surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for an indefinite period of time, since research has identified no point beyond which the risk for HCC is reduced to that of patients without liver disease. For patients with earlier stages of fibrosis, no surveillance is recommended.

Continue endoscopic screening for varices in all patients with cirrhosis (whether or not they have SVR). However, in patients with SVR who are not at risk for progressive liver disease, if no varices are identified within 2 to 3 years, cessation of further surveillance may be considered.

Noninvasive methods can be used to assess progression and regression of fibrosis after SVR. However, do not alter HCC surveillance protocols in patients with baseline cirrhosis, even when regression of fibrosis is noted, since fibrosis regression assessed by noninvasive testing has not been shown to accurately indicate a reduction in HCC risk.


Naloxone - FDA clears the way to increase access and lower cost

In The News
FDA clears the way to increase access and lower cost of life-saving opioid overdose treatment drug
-Naloxone is used in emergency rooms across the U.S. to reverse a drug overdose from opioids.
-The FDA is streamlining the labeling for naloxone.
-The change clears the way for drugmakers to sell it without a prescription.

FDA Press Release
Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., on unprecedented new efforts to support development of over-the-counter naloxone to help reduce opioid overdose deaths
SILVER SPRING, Md., Jan. 17, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- With the number of overdose deaths involving prescription and illicit opioids more than doubling over the last seven years to nearly 48,000 in 2017, it's critical that we continue to address this tragedy from all fronts. This includes new ways to increase availability of naloxone, a drug used to treat opioid overdose.

When someone overdoses on an opioid, the person may lose consciousness and breathing may become shallow or stop. This can rapidly lead to death if there's no medical intervention.

However, if naloxone is administered quickly, it can counter the overdose effects, usually within minutes. While the person administering naloxone should also seek immediate medical attention for the patient, the bottom line is that wider availability of naloxone and quick action to administer it can save lives.

Naloxone is a critical drug to help reduce opioid overdose deaths. Prevention and treatment of opioid overdose is an urgent priority. Increased availability of naloxone for emergency treatment of overdoses is an important step. One potential way to improve access to naloxone is to make it available for over-the-counter (OTC) sale. FDA-approved versions of naloxone currently require a prescription, which may be a barrier for people who aren't under the care of a physician or may be ashamed or even fearful of admitting to issues with substance abuse. Having naloxone widely available, for example as an approved OTC product, is an important public health advance, and a need that we've been working on at the FDA.

Although FDA-approved prescription naloxone formulations have instructions for use in product labeling, they don't have the consumer-friendly Drug Facts label (DFL), which is required for OTC drug products. Before submitting a new drug application or supplement for an OTC drug product, companies must develop a DFL and conduct studies to show that consumers can understand how to use the product without the supervision of a health care professional. Some stakeholders have identified the requirement to perform these studies as a barrier to development of OTC naloxone products.

To encourage drug companies to enter the OTC market and increase access to naloxone, the FDA took an unprecedented step: we developed a model DFL with easy-to-understand pictograms on how to use the drug. We also conducted label comprehension testing to ensure the instructions were simple to follow.

This is the first time the FDA has proactively developed and tested a DFL for a drug to support development of an OTC product. We proactively designed, tested and validated the key labeling requirements necessary to approve an OTC version of naloxone and make it available to patients. One of the key components for OTC availability is now in place. In short, we've crafted model labeling that sponsors can use to obtain approval for OTC naloxone and increase its access. This action was part of our broader commitment to addressing the opioid crisis.

Today, we're announcing the results of our work, including posting two model DFLs (one for use with a nasal spray and one for use with an auto-injector) and the supporting FDA review. These efforts should jumpstart the development of OTC naloxone products to promote wider access to this medicine. The model DFL contains the information (except for individual product-specific information) that a consumer needs to administer naloxone safely and effectively.

During this period without a FY19 appropriation for the FDA, we've been focused on making sure that we continue critical aspects of our work, to the extent permitted by law. At this time, for products (such as naloxone) that are covered by a user fee program, our review of existing medical product applications and associated policy development regarding our review are funded by limited carryover user fee balances. We'll continue to update the public on how we're approaching our work during the lapse in appropriations.

Consumer comprehension of the model DFL was iteratively tested by an independent research contractor in a prespecified research design involving over 700 participants across a wide range of potential OTC naloxone users. This included people who use heroin; people who use prescription opioids; family and friends of people who use opioids; adolescents; and the general public. An FDA review team not directly involved in the conduct of the study independently reviewed the study report and determined that the comprehension results were satisfactory. Overall, the study demonstrated that the model DFL was well-understood by consumers and is acceptable for use by manufacturers in support of their OTC naloxone development programs. Using this information, naloxone manufacturers can now focus their efforts on final label comprehension testing of how well consumers understand the product-specific information that hasn't been already tested in the model DFL. I personally urge companies to take notice of this pathway that the FDA has opened for them and come to the Agency with applications as soon as possible.

The model DFL comes in two versions. One is for use with a nasal spray and one for use with an auto-injector. But the product-specific instructions in each version are placeholders that have not been tested by the FDA for comprehension or human factors performance. Sponsors can replace these placeholders with their own product-specific information and test it if necessary. Apart from this product-specific information, the model DFL otherwise contains all the key information needed for an untrained bystander to administer naloxone. In designing the model DFL, the FDA team sought input from multiple stakeholders in the addiction care community, as well as from the FDA internal experts, to streamline the DFL to contain only the most critical information, so that it could be easily understood in an emergency. We're grateful to the hundreds of study participants who helped us see this DFL through their eyes, which enabled us to refine the DFL multiple times until we reached a final version. These research participants enabled these efforts.

This work builds on our ongoing efforts to get this life-saving drug into the hands of those who need it most. In addition to the approval of injectable naloxone for use in a health care setting and both prescription auto-injector and intranasal forms of naloxone, which facilitate use by laypersons, we also released draft guidance to advance development of generic naloxone hydrochloride nasal spray.

Additionally, we also held a two-day advisory committee meeting last month to solicit input and advice on strategies to increase the availability of naloxone products intended for use in the community. We asked our external advisors from the FDA's Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committees to consider various options for increasing access to naloxone.

As part of HHS' ongoing efforts to combat the opioid crisis and expand the use of naloxone, in April 2017, the Department announced its 5-Point Strategy to Combat the Opioids Crisis. Those efforts include: better addiction prevention, treatment, and recovery services; better data; better pain management; better targeting of overdose reversing drugs; and better research. In April 2018, Surgeon General VADM Jerome Adams issued an advisory encouraging more individuals, including family, friends, and those who are personally at risk for an opioid overdose to carry naloxone. In December 2018, Adm. Brett P. Giroir, MD, Assistant Secretary for Health and the Secretary's Senior Advisor for Opioid Policy, released guidance for health care providers and patients detailing how naloxone can help save lives.

We're taking many steps to improve availability of naloxone products and we're committed to working with other federal, state and local officials; health care providers; patients; and communities across the country to combat the staggering human and economic toll created by opioid abuse and addiction.

For More Information:
FDA: Information about Naloxone

The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation's food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.

Media Inquiries: Sarah Peddicord, 301-796-2805, sarah.peddicord@fda.hhs.gov
Consumer Inquiries: 888-INFO-FDA
SOURCE U.S. Food and Drug Administration

10% of patients halt statins on their own, report shows

10% of patients halt statins on their own, report shows

Side effects attributed to the drugs should be discussed with a doctor first, UW Medicine cardiologist says.

In the past decade, U.S. adults’ health has generally worsened due to poor nutrition and inactivity. Statin therapy has become the cardiologist’s go-to strategy to reduce patients’ “bad” cholesterol – that is, low-density lipoproteins (LDL). In fact, statins are so effective at reducing risk of heart attack and stroke that one in four Americans over 40 is taking these medications.

With that backdrop, the American Heart Association published a report last month that acknowledged that up to 10 percent of patients discontinue their statins on their own because they experience a side effect that they attribute to the drug.

“We know that up to half of patients who’ve had a heart attack, potentially a life-threatening event, will stop taking their medications within a year,” Yang said. “And we have found that, among patients who discontinue their guideline-directed medical therapies – blood pressure or cholesterol medications, or even aspirin – that’s associated with a significantly higher risk of having a recurrent (heart) event.”

As the pool of statin-takers has increased, Yang acknowledged, so, too, have reports of side effects. Most common are achy muscles and joints and GI distress (constipation or diarrhea). Observational studies have linked statins with higher risk of diabetes and cataracts and foggy memory. But those incidences appear to be rare, Yang said, and subsequent analyses have not consistently borne out these earlier associations.

“The main point is that there are generally no major life-threatening complications or side effects of these medications,” Yang said.

Patients who are experiencing a new symptom after starting a statin should bring it to their provider’s attention.

“A major part of my job is to educate each patient on what data is accurate, and that way we can have a good discussion about risks and benefits of medication to treat cholesterol. Allowing the patient to express their concerns and what they’ve read on the internet or elsewhere is fundamental. Unfortunately, many studies reported online are not well-designed or lack strong scientific foundation.”

Region’s 1st hepatitis C heart-transplant recipient is cured

Region’s 1st hepatitis C heart-transplant recipient is cured
Brian Donohue
UW Medicine is declaring success with the Pacific Northwest’s first heart-transplant recipient to purposely acquire the hepatitis C virus (HCV) from the donor organ and then have the disease eradicated by antiviral medication.

Kerry Hayes, 49, of Anacortes, Washington, was deemed clinically cured of hepatitis C (HCV) on Dec. 20 after a blood test detected no viral load. He had acquired HCV during a transplant July 3, 2018, at UW Medical Center in Seattle and subsequently completed an eight-week course of daily antivirals.

“I’m happy and, yeah, it’s a relief,” said Hayes. “The treatment was a piece of cake, nothing to be scared of. I haven’t had any problems – no rejection or issues with the heart at all.”

Last summer, UW Medical Center formalized a transplant protocol to increase the viability of hearts from HCV-infected donors. Typically such organs are discarded unless they are a match for transplant candidates who already have the virus.

Only a fraction of U.S. transplant centers make such use of organs. The HCV heart protocol is the only one of its kind in the Pacific Northwest, according to LifeCenter Northwest, the region’s organ-procurement agency.

Currently, 30 to 35 heart-transplant candidates are on a waiting list at UW Medical Center. Each is given a thorough explanation of the HCV protocol and, at multiple junctures, given the opportunity to accept such an organ if a match becomes available, explained Jason Smith, the cardiothoracic surgeon directing the protocol.

“We hope Mr. Hayes’ positive outcome gives confidence to other transplant candidates who might benefit by opting in to this protocol,” he said. “Patients have been very receptive to being listed for these organs because it gives them the chance to get a heart potentially much sooner than they would otherwise.”

Hayes, an oil refinery worker, had lived with an underperforming heart for more than two decades. At age 28, he underwent the first of five open-heart surgeries. In early 2017, UW Medicine cardiac specialists recognized that his heart, despite earlier repairs, was failing. Hayes’ health was so dire that they implanted him with a total artificial heart, a high-tech device that keeps blood circulating and is powered by a percussive external pump. The device is a bridge to transplant for people who would likely die without it.

The device kept him going for 17 months – about a year longer than most UW Medicine patients wait for a donor heart. Hayes was grateful to be alive but said it was emotionally harrowing to wait so long for a match while being tethered 24/7 to the machine.

“It takes a lot of mental strength to live that way. Your whole body pulsates with artificial heart. It’s in your ears. It’s loud inside and out. And I was starting to get to a point where I was getting worried about still having my job and my health insurance.”

Just two weeks after Hayes consented to be considered for a HCV-donor organ, the call came with a matching organ. There was no doubt about accepting it, he said. The transplant went smoothly, and tests showed he developed HCV within two weeks of the transplant. On Aug. 4 he started the eight-week course of the antiviral Mavyret.

Hayes was cooking dinner Dec. 20 when got a phone call from Renuka Bhattacharya, the liver specialist overseeing his post-transplant care. She said his most recent blood draw detected no HCV and that Hayes had achieved a 12-week “sustained virologic response” to the Mavyret. He was cured.

“My wife was out, so I was alone. I sent a text to my whole family – my kids and brother and sisters and my mom,” he said.

Hayes’ outcome suggests that the antivirals can be well tolerated by heart-transplant recipients, Bhattacharya said. “We didn’t see significant interactions with the anti-rejection meds.” Additionally, UW Medicine’s liver-transplant program just had its first patient complete the HCV protocol, with similar success, she said.

If a patient's first round of antivirals does not eradicate the HCV, the team would re-treat with a longer course, Bhattacharya added.

It was more than two years ago, as the HCV curative regimens were becoming more readily available, that Smith, Bhattacharya and colleagues started discussing an expanded use of infected donor organs.

Devising a protocol meant addressing myriad what-ifs. Stakeholders in cardiac surgery, transplant and liver-care services needed to feel very confident about patient safety. And it was unknown whether insurance would cover the antivirals, which in 2016 cost upward of $80,000 per patient. Those prices have dropped considerably, making the protocols viable.

“Now it’s just about spreading the word to organ-procurement organizations around the U.S. that we’re willing to take HCV-positive donors,” Smith said. UW Medical Center could see as much as a 10 percent increase in transplants because of the new protocol, he estimated.

For patients like Hayes who are wait-listed for a heart transplant, the benefit of an increased donor pool is obvious. But there is also an upside for the families of intended donors whose organs have, in the past, had no chance of transplant because of hepatitis C.

“Transplant is a great social gift that donors and donor families give back to society,” Smith said. “One thing I’ve learned over the years in transplant: I don’t think donor families see donation as a sacrifice. They see it as an opportunity. So anything we can do to make better use of that gift can give them solace.”

Successful hepatitis C treatment decreases the incidence of complications associated with type 2 diabetes.

Sustained virological response to hepatitis C treatment decreases the incidence of complications associated with type 2 diabetes. 
Li J, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 
Li J1, Gordon SC2, Rupp LB3, Zhang T1, Trudeau S1, Holmberg SD4, Moorman AC4, Spradling PR4, Teshale EH4, Boscarino JA5, Schmidt MA6, Daida YG7, Lu M1; CHeCS Investigators.

Version of Record online: 16 January 2019

Full-text article
Download PDF
View Online 

The present analysis from a large and diverse cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes shows that successful HCV treatment reduced the risks of acute coronary syndrome, end‐stage renal disease, ischaemic stroke, and retinopathy by 39%‐66%; this effect was independent of patients’ baseline fibrosis status, and consistent in subgroup analyses restricted to patients with and without cirrhosis. Chronic HCV infection, independent of diabetic status, is known to confer an increased risk of extrahepatic complications; treatment status and outcome have been associated with improvement in some, but not all, of these conditions. The magnitude of risk reduction we observed within HCV patients with T2D supports the importance of antiviral therapy among diabetic patients to reduce risk of these extrahepatic outcomes.

Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The role of hepatitis C (HCV) eradication on the long-term complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus remains incompletely studied.

AIM: 
We investigated whether antiviral treatment impacted risk of acute coronary syndrome, end-stage renal disease, ischaemic stroke, and retinopathy among diabetic patients from the four US health systems comprising the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study (CHeCS).

METHODS: 
We included CHeCS HCV patients with diagnosis codes for type 2 diabetes who were on antidiabetic medications. Patients were followed until an outcome of interest, death, or last health system encounter. The effect of treatment on outcomes was estimated using the competing risk analysis (Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]), with death as a competing event.

RESULTS: 
Among 1395 HCV-infected patients with type 2 diabetes, 723 (52%) were treated with either interferon-based or direct-acting antivirals (DAAs); 539 (75% of treated) achieved sustained virological response (SVR). After propensity score adjustment to address treatment selection bias, patients with SVR demonstrated significantly decreased risk of acute coronary syndrome (sHR = 0.36; P < 0.001), end-stage renal disease (sHR = 0.46; P < 0.001), stroke (sHR = 0.34; P < 0.001), and retinopathy (sHR = 0.24; P < 0.001) compared to untreated patients. Results were consistent in subgroup analyses of DAA-treated patients and interferon-treated patients, an analysis of cirrhotic patients, as well as in sensitivity analyses considering cause-specific hazards, exclusion of patients with on-treatment retinopathy, and treatment status as a time-varying covariate.

CONCLUSION: 
Successful HCV treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes significantly reduces incidence of acute coronary syndrome, end-stage renal disease, ischaemic stroke, and retinopathy, regardless of cirrhosis. Our findings support the importance of HCV antiviral therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes to reduce the risk of these extrahepatic outcomes.

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Undiagnosed HBV, HCV, HIV prevalent in newly diagnosed cancer cases


Undiagnosed HBV, HCV, HIV prevalent in newly diagnosed cancer cases ...
Healio
Researchers discovered a substantial proportion of patients with newly diagnosed cancer and concurrent hepatitis C or hepatitis B were unaware of their viral infection and many had no identifiable risk factors, according to a recently published study.

Level Maps Showing Impact of Hepatitis C Epidemic Across the U.S.

HepVu Releases State-Level Maps Showing Impact of Hepatitis C Epidemic Across the U.S.

ATLANTA, Jan. 16, 2019 – Today, HepVu launched new interactive maps visualizing state-level estimates of people living with Hepatitis C across the United States that highlight a concentration of infections in some states most impacted by the opioid epidemic. Published in JAMA Network Open, the data reveal an estimated 2.3 million people living with Hepatitis C infection in the U.S. between 2013 and 2016, with a high burden in the West and in some Appalachian states.

“We still have more than 2 million people living with Hepatitis C at a time when ending this epidemic is possible,” said Patrick Sullivan, Ph.D., DVM, Professor of Epidemiology at Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health and Principal Scientist for AIDSVu. “Hundreds of thousands of Americans have been cured of Hepatitis C with newly available treatments, yet new Hepatitis C infections have nearly tripled in recent years as a consequence of increasing injection drug use associated with the opioid epidemic. At the same time, many older Americans, who have been living with Hepatitis C for decades, still remain undiagnosed and untreated. Halting the Hepatitis C epidemic requires a commitment across the nation to diagnose and cure people living with the virus and stop new infections before they erode our significant progress.”

Three-fourths of Americans living with Hepatitis C are Baby Boomers (those born between 1945 and 1965). However, the largest increases in Hepatitis C infections over the last decade have been among individuals less than 40 years old and particularly among persons who inject drugs.

“Hepatitis C and other infectious diseases are often-overlooked consequences of America’s opioid crisis,” said Eli Rosenberg, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University at Albany School of Public Health, State University of New York. “Our analysis helps to pinpoint the concentration of the disease geographically and shows the burden of Hepatitis C is greater in places highly affected by the opioid epidemic.”

Key findings include:
-The Western U.S. has the highest rate of people with evidence of Hepatitis C infection, with 10 of the region’s 13 states having an estimated Hepatitis C prevalence above the national median.
-There is also a concentration of Hepatitis C in Appalachia, likely related to the opioid epidemic in these states. Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee are now among the 10 hardest-hit states.
-Nine states (California, Florida, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas) represent more than half, or 52 percent of all persons with Hepatitis C nationally – and five of the nine states are in Appalachia.

“One of the most critical challenges in our national response to viral hepatitis is limited data that we can use to understand and monitor the epidemic,” continued Sullivan. “Accurate estimates of the burden of Hepatitis C infection in each state are essential to inform policy, programmatic, and resource planning for elimination strategies across the U.S. By mapping Hepatitis C in the U.S., HepVu seeks to provide a comprehensive picture of the disease’s impact on states to inform researchers and public health decision-makers’ prevention and care efforts.”

HepVu is a Powered By AIDSVu project presented by Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health in partnership with Gilead Sciences, Inc. State-level Hepatitis C prevalence estimates on HepVu can be viewed alongside social determinants of health and data related to the opioid epidemic, including opioid prescription rate, narcotic overdose mortality rate, and pain reliever misuse prevalence. HepVu also visualizes data on Hepatitis C-related mortality (2016) obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) WONDER Online Database System. Additionally, HepVu offers downloadable datasets for researchers and health departments to utilize in their own analyses, infographics on Hepatitis B and C, and state-specific factsheets.

The state-level Hepatitis C prevalence estimates displayed on HepVu are produced by the Emory University Coalition for Applied Modeling for Prevention (CAMP) project with researchers from the University of Albany and developed with CDC. Findings were published in the peer-reviewed Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network Open in an article titled, “Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection, US States and District of Columbia, 2013 – 2016”.

The new data are derived using an updated approach to the previously published methodology for 2010 state-specific Hepatitis C prevalence estimation that reflects current changes to the epidemic. To estimate state-level Hepatitis C prevalence, researchers analyzed blood test results from the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and vital statistics data from 2013 through 2016, and incorporated data on Hepatitis C-related deaths and narcotic overdose deaths. The researchers also estimated the number of Hepatitis C infections among populations not included in NHANES, including incarcerated, unsheltered homeless, and nursing home resident populations. For more information on the data methods, please visit HepVu.org.