Showing posts with label encephalopathy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label encephalopathy. Show all posts

Sunday, February 26, 2017

Probiotics for people with hepatic encephalopathy

Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews

Probiotics for people with hepatic encephalopathy
Rohan Dalal, Richard G McGee, Stephen M Riordan, Angela C Webster
First published: 23 February 2017 Editorial Group: Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008716.pub3

Plain language summary

Why the review is important
Hepatic encephalopathy is a disorder of brain function as a result of liver failure or portosystemic shunt or both. Both hepatic encephalopathy (clinically overt) and minimal hepatic encephalopathy (not clinically overt) significantly impair patient’s quality of life and daily functioning and represent a significant burden on healthcare resources. Probiotics are live micro-organisms, which when administered in adequate amounts may confer a health benefit on the host. We searched and summarised randomised trials about the benefits and harms of any probiotic in any dosage, compared with placebo or no intervention, or with any other treatment for people with any grade of acute or chronic hepatic encephalopathy.

Main findings
The evidence is current to June 2016. Of the 21 included trials including 1420 participants, 14 trials compared a probiotic with placebo or no treatment and seven trials compared a probiotic with lactulose. The treatment duration of the trials ranged from 10 days to 180 days.

Compared with placebo or no intervention, probiotics probably improve recovery and may lead to improvements in the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy, quality of life, and plasma ammonia concentrations, but may lead to little or no difference in mortality. Probiotics may slightly improve quality of life when compared with no intervention; however, this conclusion is based on three trials with low-quality evidence. Whether probiotics are better than lactulose for hepatic encephalopathy is uncertain because the quality of the available evidence was very low. There were no reports of septicaemia attributable to probiotic in any trial. There was no evidence of more adverse events with probiotics when compared to placebo or lactulose.

Funding
Eight trials declared their funding source, of which six were independently funded and two were industry funded. The remaining 13 trials did not disclose their funding source.

Limitations of the review
Many of the included trials suffered from a high risk of systematic error (‘bias’) and a high risk of random error (‘play of chance’). Accordingly, we consider the evidence to be of low quality.

Conclusions
Compared with placebo or no intervention, probiotics probably improve recovery and may lead to improvements in the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy, quality of life, and plasma ammonia concentrations, but probiotics may lead to little or no difference in mortality. Whether probiotics are better than lactulose for hepatic encephalopathy is uncertain because the quality of the available evidence was very low. High-quality randomised clinical trials with standardised outcome collection and data reporting are needed to further clarify the true efficacy of probiotics.

*Purchase required to access this article

Monday, December 1, 2014

Probiotics for Cirrhosis?

bacteria in the intestinal microbiota
Probiotics for Cirrhosis?

A probiotic solution significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization for hepatic encephalopathy and markers of liver disease severity in patients with cirrhosis, researchers report in the December issue of Gastroenterology.

Hepatic encephalopathy develops in 50%–70% of patients with cirrhosis; fewer than 50% of these patients survive for 1 year. Rifaximin and lactulose are commonly used to try to prevent hepatic encephalopathy, but there are concerns about their cost and side effects. Many patients develop breakthrough episodes of hepatic encephalopathy despite prophylactic treatment with these agents.

Hepatic encephalopathy has been linked to alterations in the intestinal microbiota, increased production of gut-derived toxins such as ammonia and indoles, and endotoxemia, which lead to systemic and cerebral inflammation.

Probiotics can alter numbers, composition, and functions of bacteria in the intestinal microbiome and reduce levels of ammonia. Radha K. Dhiman et al therefore performed a randomized controlled trial to determine whether probiotics could prevent recurrence of hepatic encephalopathy and improve liver function in patients with cirrhosis.

At a hospital in India, 130 patients with cirrhosis who had recovered from an episode of hepatic encephalopathy in the previous month were randomly assigned to groups given a probiotic preparation (VSL#3, 9 × 1011 colony-forming units per sachet) or placebo (controls) each day for 6 months.

VSL#3 contains 4 Lactobacillus species (L paracasei, L plantarum, L acidophilus, and L delbrueckii subspecies bulgaricus), 3 Bifidobacterium species (B longum, B infantis, and B breve), and Streptococcus thermophiles.

After the 6 month period ended, only 34.8% of subjects in the probiotic group had developed hepatic encephalopathy, compared with 51.6% in the control group, although this difference was not significant.

However, significantly fewer patients in the probiotic group were hospitalized for hepatic encephalopathy (19.7% vs 42.2% of controls) or for complications of cirrhosis (24.2% vs 45.3% of controls). The mean time to hospitalization for any reason was 136 days in the probiotic group and 109 days in the placebo group.

Child–Turcotte–Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease scores (indicators of liver disease) improved significantly from baseline to 6 months in the probiotic group, but not in the placebo group.

There were no adverse events related to VSL#3. Thirty patients died during the study: 14 in the probiotic group and 16 in the placebo group.

Fasting blood ammonia levels decreased among patients in the probiotic group and increased among patients in the placebo group, although these were not statistically significant. Plasma indole levels decreased significantly only in the probiotic group.

Although plasma levels of the inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF), IL1B, and IL6 decreased significantly in the probiotic group, there was no significant change in the placebo group. Plasma levels of renin and brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) also decreased significantly in the probiotic group but not the placebo group.

How could a probiotic reduce markers of liver disease, complications of cirrhosis, and even risk of hospitalization? Dhiman et al explain that bacterial overgrowth and impaired intestinal barrier integrity in patients with cirrhosis leads to endotoxemia. Endotoxemia initiates liver damage through its interaction with Toll-like receptors, which activate immune and inflammatory responses. Systemic inflammation and infection exacerbate the symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with all grades of cirrhosis. Production of inflammatory cytokines such as TNFa, IL1b, and IL6 can the increase the cerebral effects of ammonia.

Probiotics have been shown to improve the integrity of the gut epithelium, promote innate immunity in the gut, and reduce local and systemic inflammation.

Dhiman et al propose that in the patients receiving the probiotics, significant reductions in renin, aldosterone, and BNP probably resulted from improved cardiac function, systemic hemodynamics, and increased renal blood flow following reductions in inflammatory cytokines. However, further studies of hemodynamic parameters are needed to confirm model.

The authors conclude that probiotic use significantly reduces the risk of hospitalization, related primarily to the development of fewer complications and episodes of breakthrough hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. They say that this could translate into significant cost savings.

In an editorial that accompanies the article, David W. Victor, III and Eamonn M.M. Quigley state that additional studies, to demonstrate a clinically meaningful reduction in recurrence of hepatic encephalopathy, are required before this or any other probiotic can be recommended for treatment of patients.

They say it is also important to identify the bacterial populations whose presence, or absence, affect risk for hepatic encephalopathy. This would facilitate development of probiotic formulations best suited for therapy or prevention.

Source - http://journalsblog.gastro.org/probiotics-for-cirrhosis/

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Video Dr. Galati: Basics Of Encephalopathy-A Serious Complication Of Cirrhosis



See all videos - Joe Galati, M.D.
Website

Jan 28
Video: Hepatic encephalopathy
Hepatic encephalopathy is a serious complication of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Dr. Joseph Galati, with Houston Methodist, explains the basics of hepatic encephalopathy, and reviews risk factors and treatment options. Patients that develop hepatic encephalopathy in many cases require consideration for liver transplant. Once hepatic encephalopathy develops, it is generally a signal that the liver is in the advancing stages of damage, and there is a decreased survival associated with it. There are medications available to treat hepatic encephalopathy.

Symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy include fatigue, difficulty sleeping, excessive sleep, memory loss, changes in behavior and personality, confusion, and possible coma.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

EASL - Probiotics Found to Reduce Hepatic Encephalopathy in Cirrhotic Patients


Probiotics Found to Reduce Hepatic Encephalopathy in Cirrhotic Patients

Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Thursday 25 April 2013: Probiotics could emerge as a treatment plan to manage hepatic encephalopathy (HE) therapy after a new study[1] announced at the International Liver Congress™ 2013 found they significantly reduced development of the notoriously difficult-to-treat disease.

The study analysed the efficacy of probiotics in preventing the development of HE in 160 cirrhotic patients over a period of approximately nine months and found significant improvements in reducing patients’ arterial ammonia levels after three months of treatment with probiotics.

Ammonia, produced by gut bacteria, is thought to be one of the main mediators of cerebral dysfunction in HE. Probiotics work by enriching the gut flora with a non-urease producing microorganisms, which decrease ammonia production.[2] Probiotics are live microorganisms (mostly bacteria) that produce a health benefit on the host when administered in adequate amounts.[3]

Twice as many patients taking a placebo developed overt HE (the study’s primary endpoint) compared to patients taking probiotics in the form of a capsule.

EASL’s Treasurer, Prof. Mauro Bernardi welcomed the findings and said they would provide a positive impact for cirrhotic patients at risk of developing HE for whom the prognosis is typically very poor.

Prof. Bernardi said: “Hepatic encephalopathy is an insidious disease that’s caused by an accumulation of toxins in the blood that are normally removed by the liver. Treatment normally involves the use of antibiotics or laxatives to suppress the production of toxic substances in the intestine but there is still a great deal of room for improvement so it will be exciting to see the results of further studies to determine if clinicians have a new form of treatment on the cards.”

Hepatic encephalopathy is a spectrum of neuropsychiatric abnormalities including personality changes, intellectual impairment and reduced levels of consciousness in patients with liver failure, after exclusion of other known brain disease.

http://virtualpressoffice.easl.eu/

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Increased risk of cognitive impairment in cirrhotic patients with bacterial infections

Related @ Healio

Bacterial infection increased cognitive impairment among cirrhotic patients
Patients with cirrhosis who developed bacterial infection were at significantly increased risk for cognitive impairment, according to recent results...
Read more...

Journal of Hepatology

Increased risk of cognitive impairment in cirrhotic patients with bacterial infections

Received 27 November 2012; received in revised form 2 March 2013; accepted 6 March 2013. published online 25 March 2013.

Accepted Manuscript
Abstract
PDF

Abstract
Background & aims

A causal relationship between infection, systemic inflammation and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has been suggested in cirrhosis. No study, however, has specifically examined, in cirrhotic patients with infection, the complete pattern of clinical and subclinical cognitive alterations and its reversibility after the resolution. Our investigation was aimed at describing the characteristics of cognitive impairment in hospitalized cirrhotic patients, in comparison with patients without liver disease, with and without infection.

Methods
One-hundred and fifty cirrhotic patients were prospectively enrolled. Eighty-one patients without liver disease constituted the control group. Bacterial infections and sepsis were actively searched in all patients independently of their clinical evidence at entry. Neurological and psychometric assessment was performed at admission and in case of nosocomial infection. The patients were re-evaluated after the resolution of the infection and 3 months later.

Results
Cognitive impairment (overt or subclinical) was recorded in 42% of cirrhotics without infection, in 79% with infection without SIRS and in 90% with sepsis. The impairment was only subclinical in controls and occurred only in patients with sepsis (42%). Multivariate analysis selected infection as the only independent predictor of cognitive impairment (OR 9.5; 95% CI 3.5-26.2; p=0.00001) in cirrhosis. The subclinical alterations detected by psychometric tests were also strongly related to the infectious episode and reversible after its resolution.

Conclusions
Infections are associated with a worse cognitive impairment in cirrhotics compared to patients without liver disease. The search and treatment of infections is crucial to ameliorate both clinical and subclinical cognitive impairment of cirrhotic patients.

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Mayo Clinic, discusses ascites, encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding, dysphagia, abdominal discomfort, and Crohn's disease.

Dr. Amy Oxentenko, Assistant Professor of Medicine at Mayo Clinic, discusses "Clinical Pearls in Gastroenterology," including ascites, encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding, dysphagia, abdominal discomfort, and Crohn's disease.


Monday, November 12, 2012

AASLD-HALT-HE Study Underscores Role of Ammonia in Hepatic Encephalopathy

HALT-HE Study Underscores Role of Ammonia in Hepatic Encephalopathy

Hyperion Reports Phase 2 Study Results at AASLD Plenary Session
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., Nov. 12, 2012 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

Hyperion Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:HPTX) announced today that the results of the Phase 2 HALT-HE Study were presented at the Presidential Plenary Session I of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) (The Liver Meeting®), in Boston, MA.

Principal Investigator Don Rockey, Chief of Medicine at the Medical University of South Carolina delivered an oral presentation entitled, Randomized, controlled, double-blind study of glycerol phenylbutyrate in patients with cirrhosis and episodic hepatic encephalopathy.

Dr. Rockey explained, "The study results provide new insight into the importance of ammonia in the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Based on its safety profile, Hyperion's investigational drug, glycerol phenylbutyrate (GPB), or "Ravicti", shows promise as a novel therapeutic agent."

Dr. Rockey explained,

  • The study met its primary endpoint: significantly fewer patients in the active arm experienced HE events - 21% vs. 36% (p = 0.021).
  • Compared to placebo, patients randomized to GPB also had significantly fewer total HE events (35 vs. 57 p=0.035), significantly lower ammonia values (46 vs. 58 umol/L p=0.036), and significantly fewer symptomatic days (13 vs. 27; p=0.015).
  • There were non-statistically significant trends in favor of fewer HE-hospitalizations and fewer total HE-hospital days.
  • Safety appeared satisfactory (76% and 79% of subjects in the placebo and GPB groups, respectively, reported AEs) and the adverse event profile was consistent with that expected for the study population.
  • Ammonia was significantly lower on GPB (45.7 vs. 58.15 umol/L, p = 0.036) and correlated with the likelihood of HE events whether measured at baseline or during the study (p < 0.01)
The study enrolled 178 total patients, of whom 59 were on Rifaximin at baseline, including 29 in the placebo arm and 30 in the active arm. Among the 119 patients not on Rifaximin at baseline, there was a highly statistically significant reduction among GPB treated patients in both the percentage of patients with events (10% vs 32%; p=0.003) as well as the total number of HE events (7 vs. 31; p<0.001). Among patients on Rifaximin at baseline, there was no difference in the number of patients with events or total events. Ammonia was similarly lowered on GPB among patients taking (67 vs. 91 umol/L; p=0.13) or not taking (36 vs. 43 umol/L; p=0.08), although the differences were not statistically significant due to the smaller sample size. Patients on Rifaximin at baseline had higher ammonia levels than those not on Rifaximin.

The abstract is published online at https://www.aasld.org/lm2012. The HALT-HE study was a Phase II, multi-center, randomized, double-blind trial of glycerol phenylbutyrate vs. placebo in 178 patients with episodic HE recruited from 28 sites in the United States, 9 sites in Russia and 7 sites in Ukraine. 88 patients were randomized to the placebo group and 90 to the GPB arm. The 178 patients enrolled constituted the intention to treat and safety populations. 55 patients in the GPB arm and 67 patients in the placebo arm completed the study. The population was well balanced with respect to lactulose and Rifaximin use, prior HE history and MELD score.

Hyperion also indicated that it was hosting and webcasting an analyst and investor briefing to recap the Plenary Session presentation tonight, November 12, 2012, in Boston, MA at from 6:30 p.m. — 7:30 p.m. ET in the Commonwealth Room of the Sheraton Hotel, connected to the Boston Hynes Convention Center. The webcast can be accessed from Hyperion's website www.hyperiontx.com in the Investors tab, under Events.

About Hepatic Encephalopathy

HE is a serious but potentially reversible neurological disorder that can occur in patients with cirrhosis of any etiology or acute liver failure. HE comprises a spectrum of neurological signs and symptoms ranging from mild (e.g. minimal disorientation) to severe (e.g. coma, death) and is believed to occur when the brain is exposed to gut-derived toxins such as ammonia that are normally removed from the blood by a healthy liver. Based on the current epidemiological literature, Hyperion estimates that there are approximately one million patients in the United States with cirrhosis, of whom approximately 140,000 have overt HE.

About Glycerol Phenylbutyrate

Glycerol phenylbutyrate, an investigational drug, is a pre-pro-drug of phenylacetic acid, the active moiety of BUPHENYL®, the only branded therapy currently FDA-approved as adjunctive therapy for the chronic management of patients with the most prevalent urea cycle disorders. Glycerol phenylbutyrate holds orphan product designations in the United States and Europe for the maintenance treatment of patients with urea cycle disorders (UCD) and in the United States for the intermittent or chronic treatment of patients with cirrhosis and any grade of hepatic encephalopathy.

About Hyperion Therapeutics

Hyperion Therapeutics is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of novel therapeutics to treat disorders in the areas of orphan diseases and hepatology. Hyperion Therapeutics is developing Ravicti™ (glycerol phenylbutyrate) for two orphan indications: UCD and HE.

BUPHENYL® is a registered trademark of Ucyclyd Pharma, Inc.

Forward-Looking Statements:

To the extent that statements contained in this press release are not descriptions of historical facts regarding Hyperion, they are forward-looking statements reflecting the current beliefs and expectations of management made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," and similar expressions (as well as other words or expressions referencing future events, conditions or circumstances) are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements contained in this press release include, among others, statements regarding our expectations regarding the timing of the presentation of the results of the HALT-HE study in November. Hyperion undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. For a further description of the risks and uncertainties relating to the business of the company in general, see Hyperion's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7 and any subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

CONTACT: Shari Annes, Investor Relations
         Telephone: 650 888 0902
         sannes@annesassociates.com

Source: Hyperion Therapeutics, Inc.

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Advanced liver disease and hepatic encephalopathy in the elderly



An estimated eight million Americans suffer from chronic liver disease, with more than half a million living with cirrhosis. Several factors contribute to the rising rates of liver disease.

Recent news coverage pointed the spotlight on hepatitis C and the baby boomer population, but the elderly population also is particularly susceptible to liver disease, and its care often falls into the hands of skilled nurses in long-term care facilities across the country.

The Leading Causes of Liver Disease
The most common underlying causes of cirrhosis in the Unites States are hepatitis C and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Hepatitis C is the most common indication for liver transplantation and the major driver of primary liver cancer. A recent recommendation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to test Americans born between 1945 and 1965 will lead to a higher diagnosis rate in this baby boomer cohort. Increasingly viable treatments for hepatitis will allow more patients to be treated over the coming five to 10 years if they can be diagnosed.

NAFLD may afflict 20% of the population. Five percent have an aggressive variant of the condition called steatohepatitis. Largely driven by obesity and insulin resistance, steatohepatitis will be an emerging health concern in the elderly population as well.

The diagnosis of advanced liver disease is important to make in the elderly population since many of the condition's features are treatable and can lead to improved quality of life and, most importantly, decrease the likelihood of acute care hospitalization, which carries a high risk of nosocomial infections and therapeutic mishaps in the aged population. Patients with risk factors for hepatitis should be screened for liver disease, along with those that have a family history of liver disease, or a history of long term or heavy alcohol consumption.

Advanced Liver Disease Can Affect the Body and the Mind
Advanced liver disease is defined by the presence of fibrosis or scar tissue in the liver. This clinical finding may include the presence of esophageal varices, ascites, and jaundice.
Resistance to flow of blood through the liver is a condition called portal hypertension. The presence of collagen or fibrous tissue in and around the liver cells or hepatocytes leads to a change in architecture and hampers blood flow and hepatic function.

This increased resistance to blood flow leads to dilation of blood vessels flowing into the liver, namely the portal vein and the veins comprising it, such as the superior mesenteric vein and splenic vein, esophageal vein, and gastric veins, which are susceptible to rupture and bleeding when dilated and under high pressure. This manifests as intestinal bleeding, which can present as emesis of blood or passage of blood per rectum, often leading to urgent hospitalization in an acute care setting.
The high pressures associated with portal hypertension also lead to leakage of serum into the abdominal cavity, and the formation ascites. This fluid leads to distention of the abdomen, and can lead to compromised breathing, infection and even renal insufficiency. The treatment for this condition is sodium restriction and the use of diuretics.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) also can occur as a result of portal hypertension. Resistance to blood flow leads to shunting of blood around the liver, allowing blood from the gut containing ammonia and other byproducts of bacterial metabolism to bypass the liver and reach the systemic circulation. Exposing the brain to these chemicals can result in interference with normal synaptic transmission of electrical and chemical signaling in the brain. As a result, cognition and memory are affected, leading to memory loss, impaired thinking, and an inability to perform fine motor tasks.

Diagnosing and Treating Hepatic Encephalopathy in the Elderly
In an elderly population, there are pitfalls to making the diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy since other conditions can mimic the findings. The most important first step is to accurately diagnose liver disease. Organic brain syndrome can be confused with hepatic encephalopathy since it is prevalent in the elderly and the cognitive and memory impairment can be similar.
Another condition that can be confused with encephalopathy is delirium due to medication adverse events or “polypharmacy” and drug interactions. Additionally, elevated ammonia occurs with uremia due to renal failure, which can present like hepatic encephalopathy. Rarely, a defect in the urea cycle leads to elevated ammonia and this can sometimes present with cognitive changes.
HE is treated by lowering ammonia levels. This can be done through administration of lactulose by mouth or rectally, or via administration of a non-absorbed broad spectrum antibiotic called rifaximin (Xifaxan), both of which are FDA approved therapies with proven safety records. Many prefer rifaximin due to the lack of diarrhea associated with lactulose, which can often lead to dehydration in the frail elderly population.

Preparing for the Rise in Liver Disease
A significant increase in the numbers of Americans with advanced liver disease is expected over the next decade, in large part due to the aging baby boomer population that has a hepatitis C prevalence of 3.3%. It is thought that roughly one third of hepatitis C infected patients currently has advanced fibrosis, and will likely progressive to more advanced disease before they can be diagnosed and treated. This will create a tremendous burden to the health care system, including skilled nursing and long-term care facilities.

Fred Poordad, M.D., is the chief medical officer at Alamo Medical Research.

Related-Encephalopathy - Unmanaged Condition Exacts a Heavy Toll

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Encephalopathy - Unmanaged Condition Exacts a Heavy Toll

Liver Disease: Unmanaged Condition Exacts a Heavy Toll
As liver disorders increase nationwide, a condition known as hepatic encephalopathy lurks in the background


Chronic liver disease, also known as cirrhosis, saps a body’s vitality.
Worse, it can rob someone of his/her mind.

For about half of people with liver disease, the condition leads to the onset of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a disorder that causes confusion, forgetfulness and poor concentration.
These impairments accelerate when doctors fail to recognize HE early or when they treat individual episodes instead of managing HE on ongoing basis to prevent recurrence. Many episodes of HE cause patients to be hospitalized.
 
HE occurs when a damaged liver fails to filter toxins in the body. Those toxins then invade the brain, potentially causing long-term mental impairment. In one study, only 26 percent of patients demonstrated an ongoing ability to learn new information once they had been diagnosed with HE.

The problem of HE is growing.
Liver disease affects nearly six million people in the United States, and many of those people develop HE. More cases are reported every year.
Patients who don’t know they have liver-scarring hepatitis add to the population at risk for developing the condition, as do people who suffer from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.



Manage HE as a long-term condition
 
New science and research make effective and affordable HE treatments available to liver disease patients, minimizing the condition’s effect on their lives.

“The key to treating HE is to actively manage it as a long-term condition,” said Dr. Arun Sanyal, chairman of the Division of Gastroenterology at Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center. “More than anything, it’s about vigilance against recurrence.”

HE does not improve by itself and should be treated continuously with medication. Among the signs to look for in HE patients:
  • Loss of physical and mental control
  • Changes in personality or mood
  • Lapses in concentration and judgment
  • Shifts in sleep patterns and handwriting quality
People with liver disease, as well as their families and friends, should be on the lookout for a patient’s loss of mental acuity and act swiftly in response to these signs. If liver disease patients or their caregivers recognize any symptoms or signs of HE, they should consult a doctor immediately.


Few with HE treated outside the hospital

Unfortunately, though experts recommend treating HE continuously with prescription medication, many patients diagnosed with the condition are not receiving treatment. New data shows that outside of the hospital, 64 percent of patients who have been diagnosed with HE are not taking any prescription medication for their condition. This number includes patients who have had to be hospitalized for HE treatment in the past, yet are still not taking any prescriptions to manage HE.

Doctors often prescribe lactulose first when patients are diagnosed with HE because it used to be the only medication available. However, there are problems with this traditional HE treatment. Many patients who take lactulose experience uncomfortable side effects, such as diarrhea, bloating and sickness, making it difficult to stay on the medication long-term and increasing chances of HE recurrences. These symptoms also contribute to dehydration and may occasionally worsen HE rather than improve it.

When patients return home from the hospital, it doesn’t mean the battle with HE has ended. Three of every four patients taking lactulose develop recurring episodes of HE after their first episode, and many require additional hospitalization. In addition to the physical and mental toll of these recurring HE episodes, the financial burden is high as well. The average HE-related hospital stay is six days, costing roughly $38,000. Compounded by the fact that many patients can never return to work, HE can be financially devastating to a patient and his or her family.

Your physician can help find the best HE treatment options, including medicine that works over the long-term to manage HE. “If you suspect HE, tell your doctor,” Dr. Sanyal said. “The goal is to focus on long-term management, not a short-term fix.”

For more information about liver disease and hepatic encephalopathy, please visit www.liverfoundation.org.
Page updated: October 24th, 2012

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Hyperion Therapeutics to Report Results of HALT-HE Study at AASLD Plenary Session

Hyperion Therapeutics to Report Results of HALT-HE Study at AASLD Plenary Session

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., Oct. 2, 2012 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Hyperion Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:HPTX) announced today that the results of the HALT-HE Study will be presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) (The Liver Meeting®), taking place on November 9-13, 2012 in Boston, MA. The presentation, "Randomized, controlled, double-blind study of glycerol phenylbutyrate in patients with cirrhosis and episodic hepatic encephalopathy," will be made on Monday, November 12, 2012, at 8:45 a.m. ET in the Presidential Plenary Session I in the Hynes Convention Center Auditorium.

The abstract is published online at https://www.aasld.org/lm2012  and summarizes the following results: the study met its primary endpoint, a significant reduction in patients with Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE) events, and supports ammonia (NH3) as important in HE pathogenesis. The HALT-HE study was a Phase II, multi-center, randomized, double-blind trial of glycerol phenylbutyrate vs. placebo in 178 patients with episodic HE recruited from 28 sites in the United States, 9 sites in Russia and 7 sites in Ukraine.

About Hepatic Encephalopathy

HE is a serious but potentially reversible neurological disorder that can occur in patients with cirrhosis of any etiology or acute liver failure. HE comprises a spectrum of neurological signs and symptoms ranging from mild (e.g. minimal disorientation) to severe (e.g. coma, death) and is believed to occur when the brain is exposed to gut-derived toxins such as ammonia that are normally removed from the blood by a healthy liver. Based on the current epidemiological literature, Hyperion estimates that there are approximately one million patients in the United States with cirrhosis, of whom approximately 140,000 have overt HE.

About Glycerol Phenylbutyrate

Glycerol phenylbutyrate, an investigational drug, is a pre-pro-drug of phenylacetic acid, the active moiety of BUPHENYL®, the only branded therapy currently FDA-approved as adjunctive therapy for the chronic management of patients with the most prevalent urea cycle disorders. Glycerol phenylbutyrate holds orphan product designations in the United States and Europe for the maintenance treatment of patients with urea cycle disorders (UCD) and in the United States for the intermittent or chronic treatment of patients with cirrhosis and any grade of hepatic encephalopathy.

About Hyperion Therapeutics

Hyperion Therapeutics is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of novel therapeutics to treat disorders in the areas of orphan diseases and hepatology. Hyperion Therapeutics is developing Ravicti™ (glycerol phenylbutyrate) for two orphan indications: UCD and HE.

BUPHENYL® is a registered trademark of Ucyclyd Pharma, Inc.

Forward-Looking Statements:

To the extent that statements contained in this press release are not descriptions of historical facts regarding Hyperion, they are forward-looking statements reflecting the current beliefs and expectations of management made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," and similar expressions (as well as other words or expressions referencing future events, conditions or circumstances) are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements contained in this press release include, among others, statements regarding our expectations regarding the timing of the presentation of the results of the HALT-HE study in November. Hyperion undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. For a further description of the risks and uncertainties relating to the business of the company in general, see Hyperion's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, and any subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

CONTACT: Shari Annes, Investor Relations
         Cell: 650 888 0902
         sannes@hyperiontx.com
Source: Hyperion Therapeutics, Inc

Sunday, August 19, 2012

Lactulose and Probiotics Are Effective in Preventing Recurrent Hepatic Encephalopathy

Lactulose and Probiotics Are Effective in Preventing Recurrent Hepatic Encephalopathy

Both treatments were significantly more effective than placebo.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication of hepatic cirrhosis. Lactulose has been effective in treating patients with acute or recurrent HE, but data supporting its use are lacking. Probiotics might also be beneficial for these patients, by altering gut flora to reduce ammonia production, although few studies have evaluated probiotics in this setting.

Now, investigators have conducted an open-label, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of lactulose and probiotics in 235 consecutive cirrhotic patients at a single hospital in India who had recovered from HE and had not received any HE medication. Patients were randomized to lactulose (30 mL 3 times daily), probiotics (1 capsule containing 112.5 billion viable lyophilized bacteria 3 times daily), or placebo. The primary endpoint was development of overt HE, according to West Haven criteria.

During 12-month follow-up, recurrent HE developed in more patients receiving placebo (37) than lactulose (18; P=0.001) or probiotics (22; P=0.02). Rates of hospitalization and death from causes other than HE were similar among the three groups.

Comment: Although unblinded, this study was large and well executed. It demonstrated that lactulose and probiotics are similarly effective in secondary prophylaxis of HE. Whether all probiotics would be as effective is unclear, but we now potentially have other therapeutic options for preventing recurrent HE in addition to rifaximin plus lactulose (JW Gastroenterol Mar 24 2010).
Atif Zaman, MD, MPH

Published in Journal Watch Gastroenterology August 10, 2012

Citation(s):
Agrawal A et al. Secondary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis: An open-label, randomized controlled trial of lactulose, probiotics, and no therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 2012 Jul; 107:1043.

Monday, June 18, 2012

Hepatic encephalopathy-Liver disease: unmanaged condition exacts a heavy toll

Liver disease: unmanaged condition exacts a heavy toll
By (ARA)

(ARA) - Chronic liver disease, which often leads to cirrhosis (scarring of the liver) saps the body's vitality. Worse, it can rob someone of their mind.


For about half of people with liver disease and cirrhosis, the condition progresses into overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a disorder that causes confusion, forgetfulness and poor concentration. These impairments accelerate when doctors fail to recognize HE early or when they treat individual episodes instead of managing HE on an ongoing basis to prevent recurrence. Many episodes of HE cause patients to be hospitalized.

HE occurs when a damaged liver fails to filter toxins in the body. Those toxins then invade the brain, potentially causing long-term mental impairment. In one study, only 26 percent of patients demonstrated an ongoing ability to learn new information once they had been diagnosed with HE.

The problem is growing. Liver disease affects nearly 6 million people in the United States, and many of those people develop cirrhosis and, as a result, HE. More cases of liver disease are reported every year. Patients who don't know they have liver-scarring hepatitis add to the volume as do people who suffer from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Manage HE as a long-term condition
Recent scientific breakthroughs have made effective HE treatments available to liver disease patients, minimizing the condition's effect on their lives.

"The key to treating HE is to actively manage it as a long-term condition," says Dr. Arun Sanyal, chairman of the Division of Gastroenterology at Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center. "More than anything, it's about vigilance against recurrence."

HE does not improve by itself and should be treated continuously with medication. Among the signs to look for in HE patients:
* Loss of physical and mental control
* Changes in personality or mood
* Lapses in concentration and judgment
* Shifts in sleep patterns and handwriting quality

People with liver disease, as well as their families and friends, should be on the lookout for mental slowdowns and act swiftly. If liver disease patients or their caregivers recognize early signs of HE, they should consult a doctor immediately.

Few with HE treated outside the hospital
Unfortunately, though experts recommend treating HE continuously with prescription medication, many patients diagnosed with the condition are not receiving treatment. New data shows that outside of the hospital, 64 percent of patients who have been diagnosed with HE are not taking any prescription medication for their condition. This number includes patients who have had to be hospitalized for HE treatment in the past, yet are still not taking any prescriptions to manage HE.
Doctors often prescribe lactulose first when patients are diagnosed with HE because it was the only medication available. However, there are problems with this traditional HE treatment. Many patients who take lactulose experience uncomfortable side effects, such as diarrhea, bloating and sickness, making it difficult to stay on the medication long-term and increasing chances of HE recurrences. These symptoms also contribute to dehydration and may occasionally worsen HE rather than improve it.

When patients return home from the hospital, it doesn't mean that the battle with HE has ended. Three of every four patients taking lactulose develop recurring episodes of HE after their first episode, and many require additional hospitalization. In addition to the physical and mental toll of these recurring HE episodes, the financial burden is high as well. The average HE-related hospital stay is six days, costing roughly $37,000. Compounded by the fact that many patients can never return to work, HE can be financially devastating to a patient and his or her family.

Your physician can help find the best HE treatment options, including medicine that works over the long-term to manage HE. "If you have liver disease and notice a mental slow down, forgetfulness or changes in your sleep patterns, consult your doctor because these may be signs of HE," Sanyal says. "The goal is to focus on long-term management, not a short-term fix."

For more information about liver disease and hepatic encephalopathy, please visit www.liverfoundation.org, or call 1-800-GO-LIVER.

Source

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Hyperion Therapeutics' Glycerol Phenylbutyrate Meets Primary Endpoint in Phase II Study in Episodic Hepatic Encephalopathy

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., Jun 06, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Hyperion Therapeutics, Inc. has announced that its phase II study of glycerol phenylbutyrate, an investigational drug for the treatment of episodic hepatic encephalopathy (HE), met its primary endpoint: the proportion of patients experiencing at least one HE event was significantly lower on glycerol phenylbutyrate versus placebo (21.1% vs. 36.4%; p = 0.0214). The rate of adverse events was similar for glycerol phenylbutyrate versus placebo. The company is planning to request an end of phase II meeting with the US Food and Drug Administration to review the data and plans for phase III.

"I am very encouraged by these results and the potential for glycerol phenylbutyrate to address unmet needs in patients with episodic HE. The data suggest that further exploration of the possible benefits of this agent in patients is warranted," said Don Rockey, MD, Professor of Medicine and Chief of the Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, who served as a principal investigator.

About Hyperion Therapeutics

Hyperion Therapeutics is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of novel therapeutics to treat disorders in the areas of orphan diseases and hepatology. Hyperion is developing glycerol phenylbutyrate for two orphan indications: urea cycle disorders (brand name, Ravicti(TM)) and hepatic encephalopathy.

BUPHENYL(R) is a registered trademark of Ucyclyd Pharma, Inc.

SOURCE: Hyperion Therapeutics, Inc.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hyperion-therapeutics-glycerol-phenylbutyrate-meets-primary-endpoint-in-phase-ii-study-in-episodic-hepatic-encephalopathy-2012-06-06

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Neuropsychological dysfunction in cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis C

From Journal of Viral Hepatitis

Neuropsychological Tools in HepatologyA Survival Guide for the Clinician
S. Montagnese; S. Schiff; M. De Rui; M. M. E. Crossey; P. Amodio; S. D. Taylor-Robinson

Abstract and Introduction
Abstract

Neuropsychological assessment has three main applications in clinical hepatology: (i) to detect, grade and monitor liver failure-related cognitive alterations in end-stage liver disease (hepatic encephalopathy), (ii) to substantiate complaints of attention or concentration difficulties in patients with non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C viral infection, and (iii) to screen patients who are being considered for liver transplantation for early signs of dementia. However, there is limited agreement on how cognitive assessment should be conducted in these patients, and how results should be interpreted and used to implement clinical decisions. In this review, we summarize the available literature on neuropsychological dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis and with chronic hepatitis C viral infection and provide some guidance on how to utilize neuropsychological assessment in practice.

Introduction
Patients with end-stage liver disease have long been known to exhibit cognitive deficits in a variety of forms, which have been termed hepatic encephalopathy (HE). This spectrum ranges from minimal impairment, only detected on neuropsychological assessment (so called 'minimal hepatic encephalopathy' [MHE] – formerly labelled 'subclinical'),[1,2] through to overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), which can manifest as mild confusion and behavioural change through to deep coma.[3,4] More recently, it has become apparent that patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection complain of a variety of neuropsychiatric sequela including confusion ('brain fog'), anxiety and depression, in the absence of significant liver disease.[5] Most studies on these issues have been performed by hepatologists who have acted as amateur psychologists. In this review, we discuss some of the pitfalls of neuropsychological assessment and put the published studies on HE and non-cirrhotic chronic HCV infection into context.

Neuropsychological Assessment

The human mind produces an enormous set of complex behaviours. These events represent the net result of what cognitive psychologists refer to as mental operations and, as a whole, make up an individual's cognitive ability. This can be separated into domains, such as language, memory and attention (Appendix 1), and each domain can be assessed by specific neuropsychological tests.
Many conditions, including liver disease, impinge on the brain and on the patients' capacity to perform mental operations, thus on their cognitive ability. Neuropsychological assessment is the diagnostic process aimed at measuring an individual's cognitive ability by means of specific neuropsychological tests.[6] Neuropsychological evaluation is not based on the patient's history or complaints, or on his/her carer's observations, but relies on direct assessment of the patient's performance. Neuropsychological diagnosis is based on the systematic exploration of cognitive performance, with a view to defining mental functioning in patients with potential neurological or psychiatric illnesses.

In general, neuropsychological evaluation aims at defining impairment in aspects of cognition (i.e. memory, attention, language, executive function, etc.), which are thought to be sensitive to certain pathologies, and thus to be reliable indicators of their presence or absence. In this context, the scores obtained by a patient in a set of neuropsychological tests define the neuropsychological profile of the patient. The concept of neuropsychological profiling is an important one because, despite inter-individual differences (vide infra), a neuropsychological profile can, to some extent, 'define' a disease. For example, in individuals with suspected cerebro-vascular or Alzheimer-type mild cognitive impairment, isolated memory deficits on neuropsychological testing would support the diagnostic hypothesis.

Neuropsychological assessment requires meticulous attention to confounding variables. For example, physical pain may easily distract the patient from test instructions and test performance. As a consequence, the patient may be wrongly qualified as having attention or concentration deficits. Other variables that often confound neuropsychological assessment are mood (such as anxiety or depression) and sleep-wake disturbances. In addition, the evaluation of cognitive function needs to take into account socio-biological variables, such as age, sex, level of education and occupation, which are all known to affect performance. In recent years, considerable interest has arisen in the novel concept of cognitive reserve, or the degree of neuroprotection that derives from chronic enhancement of mental, social and physical activity.[7] Cognitive reserve can heavily impinge on performance in one or more cognitive domains. For example, professional sportspeople have been shown to have above average skills in certain cognitive domains, in relation to the type of sport practiced and the level of expertise.[8] Along the same lines, a London taxi-driver, who has learnt the geography of a big city almost by heart, may perform well on tests involving spatial attention abilities, despite a progressive disease that is impinging on his cognitive ability, including spatial attention. The same applies to accountants being tested on calculus and so on and so forth. This is because when an individual is tested, his/her baseline, premorbid performance is generally unknown. In addition, neuropsychological tests are scored in relation to reference, normative data obtained from large, supposedly healthy groups, stratified by country of origin or ethnicity, sex, age and level of education. Variables which make up the cognitive reserve, such as occupation and hobbies, are virtually impossible to account for in any meaningful way. Of importance to the hepatologist, the impact of cognitive reserve on both specific neuropsychological functions[9] and activities of daily living (i.e. driving)[10] has been documented also in patients with cirrhosis.

It is therefore obvious that to obtain clinically meaningful results, a neuropsychological assessment needs to be performed in a systematic fashion by adequately trained, experienced personnel.

Neuropsychological Assessment in Hepatology
In routine hepatological practice, neuropsychological assessment has different aims:
  • To detect, grade and monitor liver failure-related cognitive alterations (HE).
  • To substantiate complaints of 'brain fog' or 'concentration difficulties' in patients with HCV infection. In these patients, it has also been used to monitor treatment-related cognitive alterations (i.e. the side effects of interferon).
  • To screen individuals undergoing a transplant work-up for early signs of neuropsychiatric impairment (i.e. early dementia).
Hepatic Encephalopathy
HE is a reversible neuropsychiatric syndrome, which occurs in patients with cirrhosis and/or significant portal-systemic shunting.[3] HE manifests as a spectrum of change, which may or may not be clinically apparent. The neuropsychiatric changes detected in patients with cirrhosis by clinical examination are collectively termed OHE. The patient typically appears 'slow', somnolent, and sometimes euphoric, while in other instances obviously confused and disorientated. An involuntary jerking of the outstretched hands (flapping tremor) can be detected. The diagnosis can be difficult, especially in mild forms, thus a history obtained from a family member is valuable.[11] The detection of an obvious precipitating factor (i.e. infection or dehydration) can also help. It is important to notice how patients with cirrhosis are prone to the development of metabolic encephalopathies other than HE, such as those related to hyponatremia, hypoglycaemia and nutritional deficits, which should be ruled out.
The term MHE is used to describe the occurrence of neuropsychological and/or neurophysiological abnormalities (i.e. slowing of the electroencephalogram) in patients with cirrhosis who appear neuropsychiatrically normal on clinical examination.[1,12,13] The prevalence of MHE varies considerably, depending on the patient population studied and the tools utilized for the diagnosis. MHE predicts the subsequent occurrence of OHE,[14] impinging on the patient's ability to perform complex tasks, such as driving,[10,15,16] and usually impairing quality of life.[17] Therefore, it is important to screen for, recognize and adequately treat this syndrome.

Neuropsychological Dysfunction in Hepatic Encephalopathy: The Underlying Theory
Over the years, several different neuropsychological tests have been utilized to describe the effect of HE on various cognitive domains, to 'quantify' OHE and to diagnose MHE.[1,18] A review of the literature between 1970 and 2004 retrieved over 80 different tests, often exploring more than one cognitive domain.[19] Still, the large majority explored attention, motor speed and executive function (Appendix 1); a smaller number explored memory and the remainder other cognitive domains.

Attention has a crucial role within the cognitive system,[20] and it impinges on other cognitive functions. It is common experience that if a person does not pay attention to something, he or she may not be able to remember it later on, which does not necessarily imply that memory is not functioning properly. In addition, attention is the net result of three separate sub-functions: vigilance, spatial attention and selective attention (Appendix 1). Vigilance has not been directly measured in patients with HE, but there are both clinical[21] and electrophysiological data[22] to suggest that it is affected.[23] Selective attention seems to be more compromised than spatial attention in these patients, possibly explaining why they may be easily distracted[24] and why there is an inability to cope with conflicting tasks, or tasks which require to 'switch' between different sets of information.[25] The simplest, paper-and-pencil switching test is Trail-making test B: the patient is asked to connect numbers and letters in alternating order (1-A-2-B-3-C-4-D…), thus continuously switching between the alphabetical and the numerical sequence. Trail-making test B has been widely used in patients with cirrhosis and has proven more sensitive in detecting HE-related cognitive changes than Trail-making test A,[26] where the patient is only asked to connect numbers from 1 to 25. This is in line with results obtained by computerized neuropsychological tests, which can be helpful in dissecting a complex task in its components, and measure the time taken to perform each of them.[23] However, the delay in reaction time also depends on the complexity of the task, being progressively more marked in simple reaction times (i.e. reaction to a visual stimulus by pressing a key), compared with choice reaction times (i.e. pressing different keys in response to different visual stimuli), compared with reverse selection choice reaction times (i.e. reaction/inhibition to different visual stimuli).[27] In agreement with this concept, and based on the profound delay observed in patients with cirrhosis on reverse selection choice tasks,[28] a computerized inhibition test was recently proposed for MHE screening.[29,30] Along similar lines, a motor delay which was proportional to the cognitive load/difficulty of the task was observed in a working memory test.[31]

Limited consensus or solid data exist on which neuropsychological tests should be used to diagnose MHE and/or to quantify mild OHE. The approaches utilized so far to address this problem can be criticized as they have been 'circular' (i.e. choosing neuropsychological tests to measure functions that have been shown to be abnormal in patients with HE by neuropsychological tests), 'statistical' (i.e. choosing tests that are more often abnormal in these patients) or 'comparative' (i.e. choosing tests that often agree/overlap with other, non-neuropsychological measures of HE, regardless of the absence of a gold standard). Despite these problems, a set of reasonable suggestions were first provided by an expert panel at the 11th World Congress of Gastroenterology in 1998, and published in 2001.[12] The experts suggested that the presence of MHE should be defined by either: (i) two abnormal tests of a set of four (Trail-making Tests A and B, Symbol Digit, Block Design), or (ii) an abnormal Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score (PHES), based on a battery including Trail-making Tests A and B, Digit Symbol, Serial Dotting and Line Tracing.[32,33] The first criterion was derived from a previous, substantially arbitrary definition of MHE as a condition in which two psychometric tests are abnormal;[34] no information was provided on the total number/type of tests to administer. The second criterion was more solid, as the PHES battery was derived using discriminant analysis, in a formal attempt to maximize the separation of patients with cirrhosis with no electroencephalographic abnormalities from normal subjects and from alcohol misusers with no liver disease.[32,33]

The experts of the 11th World Congress of Gastroenterology panel recommended the use of neuropsychology as an alternative to that of neurophysiology, and, where possible, the combination of both techniques.[12]

More recent guidelines were produced by the International Society for Hepatic Encephalopathy and Nitrogen Metabolism (ISHEN), separately for neuropsychology[35] and neurophysiology.[36] The former endorsed either the use of PHES or that of a more comprehensive battery, the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS),[37] which had been used in studies of patients with end-stage liver disease on a transplant list.[38] However, there is limited experience with RBANS in hepatology; the battery is time-consuming and it seems to exceed the requirements for standard, routine HE assessment.

The ISHEN guidelines did not formally endorse any of the computerized tests utilized so far in patients with cirrhosis, which include the Posner Test,[24] the Scan Test,[31] the Inhibitory Control Test[29] and the Cognitive Drug Research battery.[39] These have generally been chosen based on known cognitive features of HE and cover psychomotor speed, selective attention, inhibition and working memory. However, their use has not yet become widespread, and available normative data are limited.

Neuropsychological Dysfunction in Hepatic Encephalopathy: Actual Practice
Two of the authors of this review, SM (hepatologist) and SS (neuropsychologist), run a joint clinic for the assessment of neuropsychiatric dysfunction in Internal Medicine at the University of Padova, Italy. Our experience is that real patients are generally more complex than those enrolled in trials and observational studies and that attribution of reported or detected neuropsychological abnormalities to liver disease may not necessarily be straightforward. A standard HE evaluation at the Padova clinic includes: (i) a doctor's review, clinical and neurological examination, (ii) a structured interview with the neuropsychologist, (iii) a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation, including both paper-and-pencil and computerized tests, (iv) an electroencephalogram, (v) a full blood count, liver function tests, renal function and electrolytes, venous ammonia, vitamin B12 and thyroid function tests. The case reports in Figs 1 & 2 illustrate how even this may not be enough and a definitive diagnosis may require further laboratory tests, cerebral imaging and re-evaluation after treatment. While it is difficult to imagine that such a comprehensive system may be routinely implemented in busy clinics and district hospital wards, it is equally important to remember that inaccurate neuropsychological diagnoses may impinge on quality of life,[17] post-transplant neurological outcome[40] and even survival.

Click Image To Enlarge


Figure 1.
Example of neuropsychiatric evaluation in a patient with alcohol-related cirrhosis. PHES, Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score, CRP, C-reactive protein, EEG, electroencephalogram, MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

Click Image To Enlarge


Figure 2.
Example of neuropsychiatric evaluation in a patient with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. PHES, Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score, EEG, electroencephalogram, TIPS, transjugual intrahepatic portal-systemic shunt.

Hepatitis C Virus and the Brain
In recent years, there has been growing evidence that neuropsychological changes in patients with chronic HCV infection may occur long before the development of significant liver fibrosis/cirrhosis.[41] A considerable proportion of patients with HCV infection complain of 'brain fog', weakness, fatigue and difficulties concentrating.[5] These problems do not seem to relate to HCV genotype or HCV replication, and their exact pathophysiology remains unknown, although a number of potential mechanisms have been proposed.[42]

Neuropsychological Dysfunction in Hepatitis C Virus: The Underlying Theory
In 2001, Forton et al.[43] described the presence of cerebral metabolic abnormalities – elevated choline/creatine ratio – in the frontal white matter and basal ganglia of HCV-infected patients by use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. These alterations were not detected in either healthy age-matched controls or in patients with hepatitis B.[43] The following year, the same group of authors showed significant impairment in concentration and working memory in 27 patients with HCV infection and active viral replication, compared with 20 controls and 16 anti-HCV antibody positive, but HCV RNA-negative patients.[44]

Since these seminal observations, a number of studies have been published on neuropsychological performance in patients with hepatitis C.[45–51] Unfortunately, these have often included (i) patients with cirrhosis, (ii) patients who had acquired the infection by previous intravenous drug misuse, (iii) patients who had co-infections, (iv) patients who had had treatment with interferon not long before the study, (v) patients who were on psychoactive medication, or (vi) patients who complained of significant fatigue, which may all impinge on cognitive performance. More importantly, neuropsychological examination was not necessarily conducted in a systematic way, with different studies testing different, often isolated cognitive functions, making the results even more heterogeneous. Finally, very stringent cut-off values for abnormality were utilized (i.e. 1.5 SD from the reference values), at least in some instances.[48] Nevertheless, impairment was reported in sustained attention, executive function, verbal learning, verbal recall, memory and working memory.[5] To date, only two studies have been completely negative. In the first, HCV-positive patients were selected amongst supposedly healthy individuals, screened for purposes of blood donation, although the medical provenance of all subjects in the study was not fully elicited;[51] in the second, they were children/teenagers, probably with a shorter interval between infection and cognitive assessment, compared with all other studies.[52]

Interestingly, limited research has been performed to compare the neuropsychological burden of HCV-related cirrhosis and that of cirrhosis of other aetiologies, although clinical experience does not suggest there are significant differences.

Therefore, while patients with HCV infection have fairly definite magnetic resonance spectroscopy alterations,[43,44,47,48] which are unlikely to be explained by previous drug misuse or HE, their neuropsychological profile remains poorly defined. This is certainly worthy of further investigation, and so are the complex interactions between neuropsychological impairment, disease perception, mood, fatigue, daily functioning and quality of life.[53] These aspects are likely to become key to treatment choices for HCV-infected patients in the near future.

Neuropsychological Dysfunction in Hepatitis C Virus: Actual Practice
The practical difficulties of neuropsychological evaluation in patients with hepatitis C are even greater than those described for HE, for two main reasons: (i) the neuropsychological profile of these patients is not defined, and there is no consensus on which tests should be used, (ii) these patients often have additional reasons for cognitive dysfunction, such as psychoactive treatment, co-infections, previous drug/alcohol misuse and even the innate impulsiveness that characterizes addictive personalities.[54,55] This trait can affect both the approach to and the performance on several tests.
Within this very complex setting, also attention to common confounders needs to be meticulous, as illustrated in Fig. 3.

Click Image To Enlarge


Figure 3.
Example of neuropsychiatric evaluation in a patient with chronic hepatitis C infection. PHES, Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score, Lp(a), lipoprotein(a), HDL/LDL, high/low-density lipoprotein, MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

Conclusions
When patients with cirrhosis or with non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C infection present with cognitive disturbance, it is often difficult to establish a causal relationship between their liver disease and their neuropsychological problems. Alcohol-related cerebral damage, bacterial infection, malnutrition, anaemia, vitamin deficiencies and renal failure can all be present in these patients, together with unrelated diseases of high prevalence, such as hypothyroidism and vascular/degenerative dementia.
For these reasons, neuropsychological batteries should be chosen, which include: (i) specific tests for the liver disease-related cognitive alterations of interest, and (ii) tests aimed at excluding gross, unrelated cognitive damage. The latter are even more important for patients who are being considered for transplantation, as subsequent treatment with immunosuppressants, especially calcineurin inhibitors, may unmask or accelerate cerebro-vascular disease.[40] Thus, when we evaluate a patient with cirrhosis, the battery will need to cover attention, visual-constructive, visual-motor and motor abilities (like PHES). If the patient is older than 55 years or is on a transplant list, long-term memory and executive function should also be tested, as an abnormal performance on Digit Symbol or Trail-Making test B, which are part of PHES, is also observed in early dementia. Similarly, visual-constructive impairment is common to both HE and Alzheimer's type dementia. However, the latter is also characterized by disturbance in long-term memory and praxis (Appendix 1). The presence of risk factors for cerebro-vascular disease, such as systemic hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia, should prompt even more accurate differential diagnosis, as cerebro-vascular disease is associated, like HE, with extra-pyramidal motor disturbance. Previous substance or alcohol misuse is associated with working memory, planning, inhibition and decision-making issues, which can be picked up not only on test results but also on the patient's approach to tests performance.[55] Therefore, while hepatologists require simple tools for routine neuropsychiatric screening of their patients,[56] accurate neuropsychiatric diagnosis often requires the interaction between hepatologists and neuropsychologists, meticulous history taking, laboratory tests, neurophysiology, brain imaging and re-evaluation over time. A consensus is required as to a practical approach for neuropsychological testing in both HE and in chronic HCV infection. While no consensus exists on simple tests to use in the clinic, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) have commissioned a joint working party on this subject. The results of the working party's report are awaited in the next year.

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/762582

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Audio - Minimal hepatic encephalopathy

April HEPATOLOGY Podcast
Dr. Jasmohan Bajaj on a new, cost-effective standard for diagnosis and treatment of drivers with minimal hepatic encephalopathy.

Click to listen

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Advanced Liver Disease: What Every Hepatitis C Virus Treater Should Know

Advanced Liver Disease Volume 19 Issue 3 August/September 2011

Please click below to listen to podcast and view text.

Advanced Liver Disease: What Every Hepatitis C Virus Treater Should Know

Note-
Audio Will Include Moments Of Hesitation/Silence During Podcast.....

Patients with advanced fibrosis need to be regularly monitored for evidence of decompensated disease, and complications need to be aggressively managed.....

This article summarizes a presentation by Kenneth E. Sherman, MD, at the IAS–USA live continuing medical education course, Management of Hepatitis C Virus in the New Era, held in New York City in April 2011.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Hepatic Encephalopathy: Overview for Patients


In this article, Dr. Saira Khaderi is a guest blogger for this this important topic that our patients with chronic liver disease face.

Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE) is reversible impaired brain function in someone with advanced liver failure. Although the exact cause of HE is unknown, we know that decreased metabolism of ammonia in liver disease plays a large role.

Most of the ammonia in our body is absorbed through the intestinal tract and enters circulation from the portal vein. A well functioning liver clears almost all of the ammonia from the portal vein and prevents it from entering the systemic circulation. In patients with liver failure, increased ammonia levels are a consequence of decreased clearance and shunting of blood around the liver. Ammonia causes impaired brain function when it crosses the blood-brain barrier and leads to swelling of special cells in the brain called astrocytes.

Some studies show that in over 80% of cases of HE a precipitating factor can be found. Some of the most common precipitating factors include:

· GI bleed

· Infection

· Dehydration

· Electrolyte abnormalities

· Constipation

· Use of sedatives and tranquilizers (thought to be secondary to increased sensitivity for these medications in patient with liver failure)

· After a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement

Unless they have acute liver failure, most patients who deal with HE have chronic advanced liver disease. Physical signs of liver failure include muscle wasting, jaundice, ascites, and edema. Many patients may also have asterixis (flapping motion of the hands when the patient is asked to hold up their arms and flex their hands).

How do you diagnose HE?

The diagnosis of HE is usually made based on clinical symptoms and the exclusion of other causes of mental status change (stroke, head trauma, etc). Common symptoms that occur in HE include change in sleep patterns, mild confusion, forgetfulness, and mood changes. More severe symptoms include disorientation, moderate confusion or drowsiness, slurred speech and even unresponsiveness. In the most severe cases, a patient may have to be intubated to protect their airway.

Checking ammonia levels to diagnose HE is controversial and not commonly used in practice. This is for two reasons: 1. The accuracy of ammonia levels is influenced by many factors (most of which have to do with how the blood sample was handled). 2. Ammonia levels can be elevated in many physiologic conditions besides liver failure. . A CT scan of the brain should be considered if there is any question of the cause of symptoms (rule out cerebral hemorrhage).

What is the treatment for HE?

The treatment for HE aims at either reducing the absorption of ammonia in the intestinal tract or increasing the removal of ammonia.

Lactulose works by decreasing the absorption of ammonia in the intestinal gut. When lactulose is catabolized by bacteria in the gut, it lowers the colonic pH. This lower pH then favors ammonia’s conversion to ammonium which is nonabsorbable in the colon thereby reducing the overall ammonia concentration in the body. Most patients are instructed to take enough lactulose so that they have 3-4 soft stools daily. The most common side effects of lactulose are abdominal cramping, diarrhea and flatus.

Rifaxamin is an antibiotic that treats HE by decreasing the production and absorption of ammonia. Although this medication may be better tolerated, it tends to be more costly than lactulose and is best suited for patients who cannot tolerate lactulose. In combination with lactulose, rifaximin may be more effective than either drug alone.

What should I do if I think a loved one has acute HE?

The best thing to do is call your doctor’s office. By asking a few questions over the phone, a qualified health care professional can determine if symptoms are mild and an office visit is appropriate, or if the patient needs to be admitted to a hospital for further evaluation and treatment. If symptoms are more severe (patient is unarousable), call 911 immediately.

What is the best way to prevent HE?

The best thing you can do to prevent HE is take your medicines as prescribed by your hepatologist and follow-up with your doctor regularly. If you have advanced liver disease, it is always important to let your doctor know of any signs of infection (fever), constipation, dehydration (decreased urine output, dizziness) and mental status changes.

http://blog.texasliver.com/

Friday, September 23, 2011

Hepatic encephalopathy: Suspect it early in patients with cirrhosis

Hepatic encephalopathy: Suspect it early in patients with cirrhosis

JAMILÉ WAKIM-FLEMING, MD, FACG
+ Author Affiliations

Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Assistant Professor, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; and MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland
ADDRESS: Jamilé Wakim-Fleming, MD, Digestive Disease Institute, A51, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail fleminj1@ccf.org.

Full Text (PDF)

Abstract
As viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease continue to increase in prevalence, we will see more cases of hepatic encephalopathy. Primary care physicians are often the first to suspect it, as they are familiar with the patient’s usual mental and physical status. This serious complication typically occurs in patients with severe comorbidities and requires multidisciplinary evaluation and care.

Key points
Hepatic encephalopathy should be considered in any patient with cirrhosis who presents with neuropsychiatric manifestations in the absence of another brain disorder, such as stroke or brain tumor.
“Minimal” hepatic encephalopathy may not be obvious on clinical examination but can be detected with neurophysiologic and neuropsychiatric testing.
Every cirrhotic patient is at risk; potential precipitating factors should be addressed during regular clinic visits.
Management requires prompt identification of precipitating factors and initiation of empiric medical therapy. Current treatments include drugs to prevent ammonia generation in the colon.
Long-acting benzodiazepines should not be used to treat sleep disorders in patients with cirrhosis, as they may precipitate encephalopathy.
Hepatic encephalopathy is a serious but often reversible complication that arises when the liver cannot detoxify the portal venous blood (TABLE 1).
Prompt identification and treatment are essential, because once overt encephalopathy develops the prognosis worsens rapidly. Thus, internists and other primary care physicians who care for patients with severe liver disease play a key role in identifying the condition. They will often see the patients when hepatic encephalopathy is in its early stages and its neuropsychiatric manifestations—reduced attention, diminishing fine motor skills, or impaired communication—are subtle. Since primary care physicians see patients over a longer span of time, they are more likely to recognize these subtle changes.

PROPOSED PATHOGENETIC FACTORS
About 5.5 million cases of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis were reported in the United States in 2001. Hepatic encephalopathy is becoming more common as the prevalence of cirrhosis increases,2 and this will have important economic repercussions; in 2001, charges from hospitalizations because of hepatic encephalopathy were estimated at $932 million.3
Hepatic encephalopathy develops as cirrhosis progresses or as a result of portosystemic shunting, so that the liver cannot detoxify the portal venous blood. Several neurotoxins (notably ammonia) and inflammatory mediators play key roles in its pathogenesis, inducing low-grade brain edema and producing a wide spectrum of neuropsychiatric manifestations.4 Yet its pathogenesis is not entirely understood, impeding advances in its diagnosis and therapy.

View this table:
In this window
In a new window

TABLE 1
Classification of hepatic encephalopathy
Several hypotheses about the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy have emerged in the last few years, and a number of factors are reported to directly or indirectly affect brain function in this condition. Ammonia and glutamine are the neurotoxins most often implicated in this syndrome5; others include inflammatory mediators, certain amino acids, and manganese.5,6

Ammonia causes brain swelling
Ammonia is primarily the byproduct of bacterial metabolism of protein and nitrogenous compounds in the colon and of glutamine metabolism in enterocytes.7
Normally, gut-absorbed ammonia is delivered via the portal vein to the liver, where most of it is metabolized into urea, leaving a small amount to be metabolized in the muscles, heart, brain, and kidneys. In cirrhosis and other conditions associated with hepatic encephalopathy, less ammonia is metabolized into urea and more of it reaches the astrocytes in the brain. The brain lacks a urea cycle but metabolizes ammonia to glutamine via glutamine synthase, an enzyme unique to astrocytes.
Ammonia causes swelling of astrocytes and brain edema via generation of glutamine, an osmotically active substance.

Glutamine causes swelling, oxidative stress
Glutamine draws water into astrocytes and induces changes of type II astrocytosis (also called Alzheimer type II astrocytosis)5 characterized by swelling, enlarged and pale nuclei, and displacement of chromatin to the periphery of the cell. Inhibition of glutamine synthase prevents astrocyte swelling in animals.8
Glutamine also enhances the activation of several receptors, including N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors,9,10 gammaaminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors, and peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptors on the mitochondrial membrane.1012 A state of oxidative stress ensues, and this affects oxidation of protein and RNA, neurotransmitter synthesis, and neurotransmission at the neuronal junction.13 Reactive nitrogen and oxide radicals induce the release of inflammatory mediators such as interleukins 1 and 6, tumor necrosis factor, interferons, and neurosteroids, and contribute to edema and neurotoxicity.6,10 Neurosteroids are byproducts of mitochondrial metabolism of steroid hormones in the astrocyte.

Manganese enhances neurosteroid synthesis
Manganese enhances neurosteroid synthesis via activation of translocator proteins on the astrocyte membrane. It was first recognized as a factor in hepatic encephalopathy when cirrhotic patients experiencing extrapyramidal symptoms were found to have deposits of manganese in the caudate nucleus and in the globus pallidus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Such deposits were also seen in specimens of brain tissue on autopsy of these patients. When the encephalopathy resolved, so did the abnormalities on MRI.14,15

Changes in the blood-brain barrier
Astrocytes contribute to the selective permeability of the blood-brain barrier. Disruptions in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier underlie hepatic encephalopathy, with poor diffusion of molecules out of astrocytes.
For instance, zinc, which plays a regulatory role in gene transcription and synaptic plasticity, accumulates in the astrocytes, causing relative zinc deficiency and further affecting neurotransmitter synthesis and neurotransmission at the neuronal synapse.6,16

Hyponatremia
Hyponatremia (a serum sodium concentration < 130 mmol/L) is increasingly being recognized as an independent predictor of overt hepatic encephalopathy and is reported to increase the risk by a factor of eight.17

Neuronal dysfunction
Astrocytes are integral to the physiologic functioning of the neurons, and it is becoming clear that both neurons and astrocytes are affected in hepatic encephalopathy.
Additionally, neuroinflammation and a decrease in energy metabolism by the brain are described during episodes of hepatic encephalopathy.18

Amino acid imbalance
An imbalance between aromatic amino acids (ie, high levels of tyrosine and phenylalanine) and branched-chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine, and valine) has been linked with encephalopathy in patients with liver disease, 1921 but it is not totally clear whether this imbalance contributes to hepatic encephalopathy or is a consequence of it.

Low-grade brain edema
Edema of the brain occurs in all forms of hepatic encephalopathy, but in cirrhosis it is characteristically of low grade. The mechanism behind this low-grade edema is not clear. Studies have shown that swelling of astrocytes is not global but involves certain areas of the brain and is associated with compensatory extrusion of intracellular myoinositol.22 This, in combination with a mild degree of brain atrophy23 observed in patients with chronic liver disease, is thought to keep the brain from extreme swelling and herniation, a phenomenon usually seen in acute hepatic failure.24,25

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting and encephalopathy
The incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy after placement of a portosystemic shunt to treat portal hypertension ranges from 30% to 55% and is similar to the rate in cirrhotic patients without a shunt.26 In 5% to 8% of patients, the hepatic encephalopathy is refractory and requires intentional occlusion of the shunt.26,27 An elevated serum creatinine level appears to be a risk factor for refractory hepatic encephalopathy in patients with a portosystemic shunt.26
In one study,28 when transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting was done early in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding, the rates of treatment failure and death were significantly less than in a control group that received endoscopic therapy, and no significant difference was noted in the rate of encephalopathy or of serious adverse effects between the groups.
Whether to place a portosystemic shunt in a patient with cirrhosis and a history of hepatic encephalopathy depends on the possible underlying causes of the encephalopathy. For example, if encephalopathy was precipitated by variceal bleeding, shunt placement will prevent further bleeding and will make a recurrence of encephalopathy less likely. However, if the encephalopathy is persistent and uncontrollable, then shunt placement is contraindicated.27

A SPECTRUM OF SYMPTOMS
The spectrum of symptoms extends from a subclinical syndrome that may not be clinically apparent (early-stage or “minimal” hepatic encephalopathy) to full-blown neuropsychiatric manifestations such as cognitive impairment, confusion, slow speech, loss of fine motor skills, asterixis, peripheral neuropathy, clonus, the Babinski sign, decerebrate and decorticate posturing, seizures, extrapyramidal symptoms, and coma.4 The clinical manifestations are usually reversible with prompt treatment, but recurrence is common, typically induced by an event such as gastrointestinal bleeding or an infection.
Minimal hepatic encephalopathy is important to recognize
Although this subclinical syndrome is a very early stage, it is nevertheless associated with higher rates of morbidity and can affect quality of life, including the patient’s ability to drive a car.29,30
Abnormal changes in the brain begin at this stage and eventually progress to more damage and to the development of overt clinical symptoms.

View this table:
In this window
In a new window

TABLE 2
West Haven Grading System
The exact prevalence of minimal hepatic encephalopathy is not known because it is difficult to diagnose, but reported rates range between 30% and 84% of patients with cirrhosis.31 Progression from minimal to overt hepatic encephalopathy is 3.7 times more likely than in patients without the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy.32
Thus, minimal hepatic encephalopathy is important to identify,29 so that treatment can be started.

Overt encephalopathy and survival
The prevalence of overt encephalopathy in cirrhosis ranges from 30% to 40% and is even higher in the advanced stages. Once encephalopathy develops, the prognosis worsens rapidly. In patients who do not undergo liver transplantation, the survival rate at 1 year is 42%, and the survival rate at 3 years is 23%.33
These rates are worse than those after liver transplantation, and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends that patients with cirrhosis who develop a first episode of encephalopathy be considered for liver transplantation and be referred to a transplantation center.34

View this table:
In this window
In a new window

TABLE 3
Glasgow Coma Scale

CHALLENGES IN DIAGNOSIS
Since the symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy are not specific and can be subtle in the early stage, its diagnosis may be a challenge. It is important to recognize that this neuropsychiatric complication occurs in people with severe comorbidities and requires dedicated time for evaluation and management.
Special tests may be needed to detect subclinical hepatic encephalopathy
In subclinical hepatic encephalopathy, the apparent lack of manifestations poses a great diagnostic challenge, but a thorough history may uncover poor social interaction, personality changes, poor performance at work, and recent traffic violations or motor vehicle accidents. Primary care physicians are usually the first to suspect the condition because they are familiar with the patient’s baseline mental and physical conditions.
For example, the primary care physician may notice decreased attention and worsening memory during a follow-up visit, or the physician may ask whether the patient has difficulty with work performance and handwork (psychomotor and fine motor skills), and whether there have been traffic violations or car accidents (visuospatial skills). Such clues, although not restrictive, may help identify patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy and prompt referral for neuropsychiatric testing.
Neurologic deficits described in the subclinical form are in the domains of attention and concentration, working memory, visuospatial ability, and fine motor skills; communication skills remain intact.35 These deficits are not reliably detected on standard clinical evaluation but can be detected by neuropsychiatric and neurophysiologic testing.
While several tests for minimal hepatic encephalopathy have been developed, they need to be validated in large trials in the United States.
Neurophysiologic tests include electroencephalography and auditory or visual event-related P300 (evoked potential) testing.
Neuropsychiatric tests traditionally involved several batteries administered and interpreted by specialized personnel. They were time-consuming and were not practical in a typical office setting. They were later refined into the Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score test (ie, the PSE syndrome test).36 This combines a digit symbol test, a serial dotting test, a line-tracing test, and a number-connection or figure-connection test. An abnormal result in at least three of the four subtests constitutes an overall abnormal PSE syndrome test.
The PSE syndrome test has been validated for standard use in Germany, Spain, Italy, the United Kingdom, and India.35 In 1999, the Working Group on Hepatic Encephalopathy designated it as the official test for minimal hepatic encephalopathy.1 But the test has not been validated for use in the United States. Other tests have been developed, but their use is also limited by a lack of validation and by copyright laws. These factors constitute major obstacles to the diagnosis of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in the United States. Nonetheless, physicians who suspect minimal hepatic encephalopathy may start lactulose therapy37 and schedule frequent follow-up visits to address and manage potential precipitating factors for overt hepatic encephalopathy.

View this table:
In this window
In a new window

TABLE 4
Precipitating factors in hepatic encephalopathy

Staging the severity of the encephalopathy
When symptoms are overt, staging should be done to define the severity of the disease. The most commonly used staging scales are the West Haven Grading System (TABLE 2)38 and the Glasgow Coma Scale (TABLE 3).39
It is essential to exclude stroke, cerebral bleeding, and brain tumor before making a diagnosis of a first episode of hepatic encephalopathy. Thereafter, such exclusion must be guided by whether the patient has risk factors for these conditions or persistent symptoms of encephalopathy that do not respond to medical therapy.
Symptoms often resolve if precipitating factors are treated (TABLE 4). The most common precipitating factors include infections, dehydration, drug toxicity, and variceal bleeding.
Laboratory tests can identify metabolic derangements
Although laboratory tests are not diagnostic for hepatic encephalopathy, they can identify metabolic derangements that could contribute to it.
Blood ammonia levels are often measured in cirrhotic patients suspected of having hepatic encephalopathy, but this is not a reliable indicator, since many conditions and even prolonged tourniquet application during blood-drawing can raise blood ammonia levels (TABLE 5).
Imaging can help exclude other diagnoses
Conventional imaging studies of the brain, ie, computed tomography and MRI, are useful only to exclude a stroke, a brain tumor, or an intracranial or subdural hematoma. They may identify changes in the white matter and deposits of manganese in the basal ganglia in patients with cirrhosis with or without subclinical hepatic encephalopathy, but they are not likely to show low-grade brain edema.40

View this table:
In this window
In a new window

TABLE 5
Conditions that may cause elevated ammonia levels

Neurophysiologic imaging studies such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy, magnetic transfer imaging, and water-mapping techniques have helped elucidate pathologic mechanisms of hepatic encephalopathy and are available in research centers, but they are not currently considered for diagnosis.

SEVERAL LINES OF TREATMENT
Treatment of hepatic encephalopathy involves a preemptive approach to address potential precipitating factors, medical therapy to reduce the production and absorption of ammonia from the gut, and surgical or interventional therapies. A multidisciplinary approach for testing the severity of neurologic impairment and response to therapy is needed to help determine if and when liver transplantation is required.

Prevent potential precipitating factors
An important concept in managing hepatic encephalopathy is to recognize that every cirrhotic patient is at risk and to make an effort to address potential precipitating factors during regular clinic visits. This includes reviewing medication dosing and adverse effects, emphasizing abstinence from alcohol and other toxic substances, and preventing bleeding from esophageal varices with endoscopic band ligation.

Diet therapy
The prevalence of malnutrition in cirrhosis may be as high as 100%. Vitamin and nutritional deficiencies should be evaluated by a nutrition specialist, and nutritional needs should be reassessed on a regular basis. Protein restriction is no longer recommended and may even be harmful.
Guidelines of the European Society of Parenteral and Enteric Nutrition in 2006 recommended that patients with liver disease should have an energy intake of 35 to 40 kcal/kg of body weight daily, with a total daily protein intake of 1.2 to 1.5 mg/kg of body weight.41 Frequent meals and bedtime snacks are encouraged to avoid periods of prolonged fasting and catabolism of muscle protein and to improve nitrogen balance. Branched-chain amino acids and vegetable protein supplements are suggested to help meet the daily requirements.42

Drug therapy to reduce neurotoxins
Drug treatment is directed at reducing the neurotoxins that accumulate in cirrhosis. A variety of agents have been used.
Lactulose (Kristalose) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a first-line treatment. It has been shown to improve quality of life and cognitive function in patients with cirrhosis and minimal hepatic encephalopathy, although it has failed to improve mortality rates.37
Lactulose, a cathartic disaccharide, is metabolized by colonic bacteria into short-chain fatty acids. The acidic microenvironment has three major effects:
It aids the transformation of ammonia to ammonium (NH4+), which is then trapped in the stool, leaving less ammonia to be absorbed
It has a cathartic effect
It reduces the breakdown of nitrogenous compounds into ammonia.43
Lactulose has an excessively sweet taste. Its side effects include flatulence, abdominal discomfort, and diarrhea. The usual oral dose is 15 to 45 mL/day given in multiple doses to induce two to three soft bowel movements daily. At this dosage, the monthly cost varies between $60 and $120.

Lactilol, a nonabsorbable disaccharide, is as effective as lactulose but with fewer side effects. It is not available in the United States.

Rifaximin (Xifaxan), a derivative of rifamycin, is FDA-approved for the maintenance of remission of hepatic encephalopathy but is not recommended as a first-line agent. It inhibits bacterial RNA synthesis in the gut. Less than 0.4% of an oral dose is absorbed.44
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients who had had at least two episodes of hepatic encephalopathy while on lactulose therapy, taking rifaximin 550 mg twice a day for 6 months provided a prolonged remission from recurrences of encephalopathy compared with placebo.45 Side effects included nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, weight loss, and Clostridium difficile colitis, which was reported in two cases in the study.45
Unfortunately, the effects of this drug beyond 6 months of therapy have not been studied. In addition, the drug is expensive: 1 month of treatment with rifaximin can cost between $700 and $1,500. Combining lactulose and rifaximin adds to the costs and the side effects, and contributes to poor adherence to therapy.
Other antibiotics such as metronidazole (Flagyl), vancomycin, and neomycin have been used as alternatives to lactulose, based on the principle that they reduce ammonia-producing bacteria in the gut. However, their efficacy in hepatic encephalopathy remains to be determined.
In controlled trials, neomycin combined with sorbitol, magnesium sulfate, or lactulose was as effective as lactulose, but when used alone, neomycin was no better than placebo.46,47 Neomycin was approved many years ago as an adjunct in the management of hepatic coma, but it has since fallen out of favor in the management of hepatic encephalopathy because of poor trial results and because of neurotoxicity and ototoxicity.
Branched-chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine, and valine)48 are reported to increase ammonia intake in muscle and to improve cognitive functions on the PSE scale in minimal hepatic encephalopathy,49,50 but they did not decrease the rate of recurrence of hepatic encephalopathy.51 While debate continues over their efficacy in the management of hepatic encephalopathy, branched-chain amino acids may be used to improve nutritional status and muscle mass of patients with cirrhosis. However, the dosing is not standardized, and long-term compliance may be problematic.
Other medical therapies include zinc,16 sodium benzoate,50 and l-ornithine-l-aspartate52,53 to stimulate residual urea cycle activities; probiotics (which pose a risk of sepsis from fungi and lactobacilli); and laxatives.

Liver dialysis
Adsorbing toxins from the blood via liver dialysis or using a non-cell-based liver support system such as MARS (Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System, Gambro, Inc.) appears to improve the amino acid profile in hepatic encephalopathy, but its role has not been clarified, and its use is limited to clinical trials.54,55
Transjugular intrahepatic shunts and large portosystemic shunts may need to be closed in order to reverse encephalopathy refractory to drug therapy.26,27,56

Liver transplantation
The current scoring system for end-stage liver disease does not include hepatic encephalopathy as a criterion for prioritizing patients on the transplantation list because it was originally developed to assess short-term prognosis in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic shunting. As a consequence, patients with end-stage liver disease are at increased risk of repeated episodes of encephalopathy, hospital readmission, and death. Therefore, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends referral to a transplantation center when the patient experiences a first episode of overt hepatic encephalopathy to initiate a workup for liver transplantation.34

Liver transplantation improves survival in patients with severe hepatic dysfunction, but the presence of neurologic deficits may result in significant morbidity and in death.57,58 After transplantation, resolution of cognitive dysfunction, brain edema, and white-matter changes have been reported,59 but neuronal cell death and persistent cognitive impairment after resolution of overt hepatic encephalopathy are also described.6063
Whether neurologic impairment will resolve after liver transplantation depends on a number of factors: the severity of encephalopathy before transplantation; the nature of the neurologic deficits; advanced age; history of alcohol abuse and the presence of alcoholic brain damage; persistence of portosystemic shunts after transplant; emergency transplantation; complications during surgery; and side effects of immunosuppressive drugs.57,58,64
The optimal timing of liver transplantation is not clearly defined for patients who have had bouts of hepatic encephalopathy, and more study is needed to determine the reversibility of clinical symptoms and brain damage. It is in these situations that neuropsychiatric testing and advanced neuroimaging can help determine the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, and it should be considered part of the pretransplantation evaluation.

Managing sleep disturbances
Insomnia and other changes in sleep-wake patterns are common in patients with cirrhosis, especially advanced cirrhosis.65 It is not known whether these changes represent early stages of hepatic encephalopathy.66 Patients often complain of fatigue, the need for frequent naps, and lethargy during the day and restlessness and inability to sleep at night. This affects the patient’s behavior and daytime functioning, and it also burdens household members and caregivers.
Long-acting benzodiazepines should be avoided when treating sleep disorders in cirrhosis because they may precipitate the encephalopathy. In a randomized controlled trial, hydroxyzine (Vistaril) at a dose of 25 mg at bedtime improved sleep behavior in 40% of patients with cirrhosis and subclinical hepatic encephalopathy, but 1 of 17 patients developed acute encephalopathy, which reversed with cessation of the hydroxyzine.66 Clearly, caution and close monitoring are required when giving hydroxyzine for sleep disorders in cirrhotic patients.
Copyright© 2011 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

REFERENCES
1.
Ferenci P,
Lockwood A,
Mullen K,
Tarter R,
Weissenborn K,
Blei AT. Hepatic encephalopathy—definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: final report of the working party at the 11th World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998. Hepatology 2002; 35:716–721.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
2.
Fleming KM,
Aithal GP,
Solaymani-Dodaran M,
Card TR,
West J. Incidence and prevalence of cirrhosis in the United Kingdom, 1992–2001: a general population-based study. J Hepatol 2008; 49:732–738.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
3.
Poordad FF. Review article: the burden of hepatic encephalopathy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 25(suppl 1):3–9.
MedlineWeb of Science
4.
Bajaj JS,
Wade JB,
Sanyal AJ. Spectrum of neurocognitive impairment in cirrhosis: Implications for the assessment of hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology 2009; 50:2014–2021.
CrossRefMedline
5.
Norenberg MD,
Jayakumar AR,
Rama Rao KV,
Panickar KS. New concepts in the mechanism of ammonia-induced astrocyte swelling. Metab Brain Dis 2007; 22:219–234.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
6.
Häussinger D,
Görg B. Interaction of oxidative stress, astrocyte swelling and cerebral ammonia toxicity. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2010; 13:87–92.
CrossRefMedline
7.
Romero-Gómez M,
Ramos-Guerrero R,
Grande L,
et al.Intestinal glutaminase activity is increased in liver cirrhosis and correlates with minimal hepatic encephalopathy. J Hepatol 2004; 41:49–54.
CrossRefMedline
8.
Tanigami H,
Rebel A,
Martin LJ,
et al.Effect of glutamine synthetase inhibition on astrocyte swelling and altered astroglial protein expression during hyperammonemia in rats. Neuroscience 2005; 131:437–449.
CrossRefMedline
9.
Llansola M,
Rodrigo R,
Monfort P,
et al.NMDA receptors in hyperammonemia and hepatic encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis 2007; 22:321–335.
CrossRefMedline
10.
Montoliu C,
Piedrafita B,
Serra MA,
et al.IL-6 and IL-18 in blood may discriminate cirrhotic patients with and without minimal hepatic encephalopathy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43:272–279.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
11.
Desjardins P,
Butterworth RF. The “peripheral-type” benzodiazepine (omega 3) receptor in hyperammonemic disorders. Neurochem Int 2002; 41:109–114.
CrossRefMedline
12.
Häussinger D,
Schliess F. Pathogenetic mechanisms of hepatic encephalopathy. Gut 2008; 57:1156–1165.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
13.
Cauli O,
Rodrigo R,
Llansola M,
et al.Glutamatergic and gabaergic neurotransmission and neuronal circuits in hepatic encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis 2009; 24:69–80.
CrossRefMedline
14.
Krieger D,
Krieger S,
Jansen O,
Gass P,
Theilmann L,
Lichtnecker H. Manganese and chronic hepatic encephalopathy. Lancet 1995; 346:270–274.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
15.
Pomier-Layrargues G,
Spahr L,
Butterworth RF. Increased manganese concentrations in pallidum of cirrhotic patients. Lancet 1995; 345:735.
Medline
16.
Schliess F,
Görg B,
Häussinger D. RNA oxidation and zinc in hepatic encephalopathy and hyperammonemia. Metab Brain Dis 2009; 24:119–134.
CrossRefMedline
17.
Guevara M,
Baccaro ME,
Torre A,
et al.Hyponatremia is a risk factor of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis: a prospective study with time-dependent analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104:1382–1389.
CrossRefMedline
18.
Hertz L,
Kala G. Energy metabolism in brain cells: effects of elevated ammonia concentrations. Metab Brain Dis 2007; 22:199–218.
CrossRefMedline
19.
Marchesini G,
Zoli M,
Dondi C,
et al.Prevalence of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotics and relationship to plasma amino acid imbalance. Dig Dis Sci 1980; 25:763–768.
CrossRefMedline
20.
Morgan MY,
Milsom JP,
Sherlock S. Plasma ratio of valine, leucine and isoleucine to phenylalanine and tyrosine in liver disease. Gut 1978; 19:1068–1073.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
21.
Fischer JE,
Rosen HM,
Ebeid AM,
James JH,
Keane JM,
Soeters PB. The effect of normalization of plasma amino acids on hepatic encephalopathy in man. Surgery 1976; 80:77–91.
MedlineWeb of Science
22.
Poveda MJ,
Bernabeu A,
Concepción L,
et al.Brain edema dynamics in patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy A magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage 2010; 52:481–487.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
23.
Bernthal P,
Hays A,
Tarter RE,
Van Thiel D,
Lecky J,
Hegedus A. Cerebral CT scan abnormalities in cholestatic and hepatocellular disease and their relationship to neuropsychologic test performance. Hepatology 1987; 7:107–114.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
24.
Sugimoto R,
Iwasa M,
Maeda M,
et al.Value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for quantification of low-grade hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:1413–1420.
CrossRefMedline
25.
Häussinger D. Low grade cerebral edema and the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2006; 43:1187–1190.
CrossRefMedline
26.
Masson S,
Mardini HA,
Rose JD,
Record CO. Hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt insertion: a decade of experience. QJM 2008; 101:493–501.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
27.
Boyer TD,
Haskal ZJ,
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of portal hypertension: update 2009. Hepatology 2010; 51:306.
Medline
28.
García-Pagán JC,
Caca K,
Bureau C,
et al.,
Early TIPS (Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) Cooperative Study Group. Early use of TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:2370–2379.
CrossRefMedline
29.
Kircheis G,
Knoche A,
Hilger N,
et al.Hepatic encephalopathy and fitness to drive. Gastroenterology 2009; 137:1706–1715.e1–9.
CrossRefMedline
30.
Bajaj JS,
Saeian K,
Schubert CM,
et al.Minimal hepatic encephalopathy is associated with motor vehicle crashes: the reality beyond the driving test. Hepatology 2009; 50:1175–1183.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
31.
Hartmann IJ,
Groeneweg M,
Quero JC,
et al.The prognostic significance of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:2029–2034.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
32.
Romero-Gómez M,
Boza F,
García-Valdecasas MS,
García E,
Aguilar-Reina J. Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy predicts the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:2718–2723.
MedlineWeb of Science
33.
Bustamante J,
Rimola A,
Ventura PJ,
et al.Prognostic significance of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol 1999; 30:890–895.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
34.
Murray KF,
Carithers RL Jr.,
AASLD. AASLD practice guidelines: evaluation of the patient for liver transplantation. Hepatology 2005; 41:1407–1432.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
35.
Amodio P,
Montagnese S,
Gatta A,
Morgan MY. Characteristics of minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis 2004; 19:253–267.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
36.
Weissenborn K. PHES: one label, different goods?! J Hepatol 2008; 49:308–312.
CrossRefMedline
37.
Prasad S,
Dhiman RK,
Duseja A,
Chawla YK,
Sharma A,
Agarwal R. Lactulose improves cognitive functions and health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis who have minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology 2007; 45:549–559.
CrossRefMedline
38.
Parsons-Smith BG,
Summerskill WHJ,
Dawson AM,
Sherlock S. The electroencephalograph in liver disease. Lancet 1957; 2:867–871.
CrossRefWeb of Science
39.
Teasdale G,
Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2:81–84.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
40.
Rovira A,
Alonso J,
Córdoba J. MR imaging findings in hepatic encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:1612–1621.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
41.
Plauth M,
Cabré E,
Riggio O,
Assis-Camilo M,
Pirlich M,
Kondrup J,
DGEM (German Society for Nutritional Medicine),
ESPEN (European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition). ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: liver disease. Clin Nutr 2006; 25:285–294.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
42.
Gheorghe L,
Iacob R,
Vadan R,
Iacob S,
Gheorghe C. Improvement of hepatic encephalopathy using a modified high-calorie high-protein diet. Rom J Gastroenterol 2005; 14:231–238.
Medline
43.
Weber FL Jr.. Effects of lactulose on nitrogen metabolism. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1997; 222:83–87.
Medline
44.
Ojetti V,
Lauritano EC,
Barbaro F,
et al.Rifaximin pharmacology and clinical implications. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2009; 5:675–682.
CrossRefMedline
45.
Bass NM,
Mullen KD,
Sanyal A,
et al.Rifaximin treatment in hepatic encephalopathy. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:1071–1081.
CrossRefMedline
46.
Blei AT,
Córdoba J,
Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:1968–1976.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
47.
Rothenberg ME,
Keeffe EB. Antibiotics in the management of hepatic encephalopathy: an evidence-based review. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2005; 5(suppl 3):26–35.
Medline
48.
Charlton M. Branched-chain amino acid enriched supplements as therapy for liver disease. J Nutr 2006; 136(suppl 1):295S–298S.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
49.
Egberts EH,
Schomerus H,
Hamster W,
Jürgens P. [Branched-chain amino acids in the treatment of latent porto-systemic encephalopathy. A placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over study] [in German]. Z Ernahrungswiss 1986; 25:9–28.
CrossRefMedline
50.
Plauth M,
Egberts EH,
Hamster W,
et al.Long-term treatment of latent portosystemic encephalopathy with branched-chain amino acids. A double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study. J Hepatol 1993; 17:308–314.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
51.
Les I,
Doval E,
García-Martínez R,
et al.Effects of branched-chain amino acids supplementation in patients with cirrhosis and a previous episode of hepatic encephalopathy: a randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106:1081–1088.
CrossRefMedline
52.
Efrati C,
Masini A,
Merli M,
Valeriano V,
Riggio O. Effect of sodium benzoate on blood ammonia response to oral glutamine challenge in cirrhotic patients: a note of caution. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:3574–3578.
CrossRefMedline
53.
Schmid M,
Peck-Radosavljevic M,
König F,
Mittermaier C,
Gangl A,
Ferenci P. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous L-ornithine-L-aspartate on postural control in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int 2010; 30:574–582.
CrossRefMedline
54.
Blei AT. MARS and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy [in Spanish). Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 28:100–104.
CrossRefMedline
55.
Heemann U,
Treichel U,
Loock J,
et al.Albumin dialysis in cirrhosis with superimposed acute liver injury: a prospective, controlled study. Hepatology 2002; 36:949–958.
MedlineWeb of Science
56.
Zidi SH,
Zanditenas D,
Gelu-Siméon M,
et al.Treatment of chronic portosystemic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients by embolization of portosystemic shunts. Liver Int 2007; 27:1389–1393.
CrossRefMedline
57.
Dhar R,
Young GB,
Marotta P. Perioperative neurological complications after liver transplantation are best predicted by pre-transplant hepatic encephalopathy. Neurocrit Care 2008; 8:253–258.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
58.
Teperman LW,
Peyregne VP. Considerations on the impact of hepatic encephalopathy treatments in the pretransplant setting. Transplantation 2010; 89:771–778.
CrossRefMedline
59.
Rovira A,
Córdoba J,
Sanpedro F,
Grivé E,
Rovira-Gols A,
Alonso J. Normalization of T2 signal abnormalities in hemispheric white matter with liver transplant. Neurology 2002; 59:335–341.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
60.
Senzolo M,
Pizzolato G,
Ferronato C,
et al.Long-term evaluation of cognitive function and cerebral metabolism in liver transplanted patients. Transplant Proc 2009; 41:1295–1296.
CrossRefMedline
61.
Butterworth RF. Neuronal cell death in hepatic encephalopathy. Metab Brain Dis 2007; 22:309–320.
CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
62.
DiMartini A,
Chopra K. The importance of hepatic encephalopathy: pre-transplant and post-transplant. Liver Transpl 2009; 15:121–123.
CrossRefMedline
63.
Saner FH,
Nadalin S,
Radtke A,
Sotiropoulos GC,
Kaiser GM,
Paul A. Liver transplantation and neurological side effects. Metab Brain Dis 2009; 24:183–187.
CrossRefMedline
64.
Sotil EU,
Gottstein J,
Ayala E,
Randolph C,
Blei AT. Impact of preoperative overt hepatic encephalopathy on neurocognitive function after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2009; 15:184–192.
CrossRefMedline
65.
Montagnese S,
Middleton B,
Skene DJ,
Morgan MY. Night-time sleep disturbance does not correlate with neuropsychiatric impairment in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int 2009; 29:1372–1382.
CrossRefMedline
66.
Spahr L,
Coeytaux A,
Giostra E,
Hadengue A,
Annoni JM. Histamine H1 blocker hydroxyzine improves sleep in patients with cirrhosis and minimal hepatic encephalopathy: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:744–753.
CrossRefMedline

http://www.ccjm.org/content/78/9/597.full