Rebecca L. Morgan, MPH; Brittney Baack, MPH; Bryce D. Smith, PhD; Anthony Yartel, MPH; Marc Pitasi, BS; and Yngve Falck-Ytter, MD [+]
Article and Author Information Ann Intern Med. 5 March 2013;158(5_Part_1):329-337
Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the United States, this form of cancer occurs in approximately 15 000 persons annually. A systematic review of the evidence is needed to assess the benefits of treatment of HCV-infected persons on development of HCC.
Purpose: To systematically review observational studies to determine the association between response to HCV therapy and development of HCC among persons at any stage of fibrosis and those with advanced liver disease.
Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews and Effectiveness from inception through February 2012.
Study Selection: English-language observational studies that compared therapy-derived sustained virologic response (SVR) with no response to therapy among HCV-infected persons, targeted an adult population, and had an average follow-up of at least 2 years.
Data Extraction: Two investigators independently extracted data into uniform relative risk measures. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to determine the quality of the evidence.
Data Synthesis: Thirty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 18 provided adjusted effect estimates that were used to calculate pooled relative risks. Among HCV-infected persons, SVR was associated with reduced risk for HCC (relative risk for all persons, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.31], moderate-quality evidence; advanced liver disease hazard ratio, 0.23 [CI, 0.16 to 0.35], moderate-quality evidence).
Limitation: In the meta-analyses, some variables could not be controlled for because of the observational design of the included studies.
Conclusion: Sustained virologic response after treatment among HCV-infected persons at any stage of fibrosis is associated with reduced HCC. The evidence was determined to be of moderate quality.
Primary Funding Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the most common blood-borne viral infections worldwide, with approximately 3% of persons infected globally (1). In the United States, it is estimated that 1.3% of the population, or 3.2 million persons, is chronically infected (2). Incidence of HCV infection in the United States increased throughout the 1960s and 1970s and peaked at an average of 230 000 new infections per year in the 1980s (3). Since the late 1980s, incidence has decreased dramatically (to 16 000 infections in 2009 (4)); however, HCV-related morbidity and mortality are increasing due to the aging of persons who were infected decades ago. Because liver disease progresses slowly with few or no symptoms, infected persons are often unaware of it and therefore do not seek prevention, care, or treatment. As this population ages, studies project that the incidence of cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) will markedly increase over the next 10 to 20 years (5 - 6). Hepatitis C virus–related deaths increased by 50% from 1999 to 2007 and, without intervention, are predicted to reach 35 000 per year in the next 10 to 20 years (5,7).
Similarly, rates of HCC in the United States have more than tripled, from 1.6 per 100 000 persons to 4.9 per 100 000 persons, over the past quarter century, and an estimated 15 000 cases of HCC occur annually (8). Chronic HCV infection is the most commonly reported risk factor for HCC, and approximately half of all patients with HCC have serologic evidence of HCV infection (9). Observational data suggest that among patients with cirrhosis, HCC occurs at an annual rate of 1% to 7% (10). Models indicate that if HCV is left untreated, 60% of infected persons will develop cirrhosis, 14.4% will develop HCC, and 37% will die of HCV-associated causes (11).
Care and treatment of HCV are available and can reduce HCV-related morbidity and mortality. Care may include provision of interventions designed to reduce or cease alcohol use (which accelerates the progression of liver disease (12)); vaccinations against hepatitis A and B infection, as appropriate; and prevention messages specific to reducing the risk for transmission to others. Unlike treatment of some other viral infections (for example, HIV), antiviral therapy for HCV can eradicate the virus (that is, absence of detectable HCV RNA) after treatment, known as sustained virologic response (SVR) (13). Sustained virologic response has been associated with a 54% reduction in all-cause mortality (14), and persons who achieve it typically show histologic improvement (15) and are at lower risk for progression of liver disease (16 - 17), HCC, and liver-related death (18). Recent advances in the effectiveness of HCV antiviral treatments have made achievement of SVR possible for most patients receiving therapy (19). Two new direct-acting antiviral protease inhibitors, telaprevir and boceprevir, were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in May 2011. The addition of 1 of these 2 drugs to the standard treatment regimen of pegylated interferon with ribavirin in clinical trials increased SVR rates from 44% to 75% for telaprevir and from 38% to 63% for boceprevir in persons with HCV genotype 1 (the most common genotype in the United States) (20 - 21). However, although it is well-documented that treatment can effectively eliminate HCV, the relationship between SVR and HCC requires further study.
Several meta-analyses have examined the relationship between achievement of SVR and subsequent development of HCC (18,22 - 26). Although these studies universally agree that SVR is strongly associated with a reduction in HCC, especially among persons who have progressed to advanced liver disease, the degree to which this association is true remains uncertain. Long-term outcomes of HCV treatment are difficult to assess because the diagnosis of HCV infection typically occurs after symptom onset at a later stage of disease. Extended natural history studies examining persons treated for HCV are lacking because the disease progresses over several decades. As a result, most available evidence examining the relationship between SVR and HCC is observational and often retrospective in nature. Previous meta-analyses have used raw numerator and denominator data to analyze these effects. However, without controlling for other known risk factors of HCC, including age, genotype, co-infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or HIV, and fibrosis stage, these studies are likely to produce incorrect effect estimates due to misspecification. Furthermore, these reviews do not include some of the more recent cohort studies with larger patient populations and longer follow-up (27).
This study presents the available evidence examining the association between achieving an SVR and development of HCC in HCV-infected adults.
Methods
Data Sources and Searches
We conducted a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews and Effectiveness from database inception through February 2012 (Appendix Figure 1). Searches were limited to English-language studies and those with human participants. The search terms we used were database-specific variations of HCV, SVR, and HCC (Appendix Table 1).
Appendix Figure 1.
Summary of evidence search and selection.
DARE = Database of Abstracts of Reviews and Effectiveness; NR = nonresponse; SVR = sustained virologic response.
Appendix Table 1. Search Strategy
Study Selection
Two investigators independently screened all citations by title and abstract. Full articles were examined, and data were extracted and entered into an abstraction form. Disagreement between investigators was reconciled through discussions or by a third investigator.
Most inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined a priori; however, 2 criteria were modified during the analysis process to strengthen the results. We included studies if they compared HCC diagnoses by SVR and nonresponse. Sustained virologic response was initially defined as the absence of detectable serum HCV RNA at least 24 weeks after treatment; however, because of recent findings that 12-week follow-up provides a similarly accurate positive predictive value, we modified this criterion to include a 12-week SVR (13). In addition, studies had to report that participants were screened and confirmed to be negative for HCC and HBV co-infection at study initiation, although this criterion was expanded during the review process to include studies that reported adjusted analyses accounting for HBV presence at baseline. We excluded studies if they had fewer than 20 participants, patients received ongoing therapy, the mean follow-up after SVR was less than 2 years, the average age of the study population was less than 18 years, the population included patients who had previously received a liver transplant, or the primary population was co-infected with HIV. We contacted study authors if articles were unclear or had incomplete information. After 2 unanswered attempts at contact, studies were considered to have incomplete information and were excluded from the analysis.
Data Extraction and Risk of Bias Assessment
Two investigators independently used a standardized abstraction form to extract data on study design; study population characteristics (demographic characteristics, co-infections, and comorbid conditions); study location (country, facility, or database); treatment regimens; methods for HCC follow-up screening; risks of bias, including study design and attrition; and outcomes. Inconsistencies among collected study information were discussed until resolved. Many articles contained information on the same or overlapping study populations; we reviewed those articles and included the manuscript with the most complete information in the analysis. Risk of bias relevant to observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (28), which determines study quality on the basis of selection, comparability, and outcome.
We evaluated the confidence in the estimate of effect of the included studies by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework (29 - 30). Two investigators with experience using GRADE independently produced the evidence tables. The factors considered when determining the quality of the evidence were risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness (addressing a different population from the one under consideration), inconsistency of results, publication bias, dose–effect response, magnitude of the effect, and plausible confounders. The final quality of evidence for the outcome of development of HCC could be categorized as: very low, low, moderate, or high.
The primary summary outcome measure was the relative effect of developing HCC after achieving an SVR versus nonresponse in patients treated with any antiviral regimen capable of viral eradication. We applied a random-effects model to pool hazard ratios from adjusted studies by using the inverse variance method (Review Manager, version 5.1; The Nordic Cochrane Center and the Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). Pooled hazard ratios and 95% CIs were obtained separately for HCV-infected persons at any stage of fibrosis and those with advanced fibrosis. Several studies had more than 2 comparison groups (for example, SVR, nonresponse, and no interferon treatment) and did not make a direct comparison between SVR and nonresponse. In such instances, before pooling estimates we calculated the log hazard ratio for the comparison between SVR and nonresponse and estimated its associated SE (31).
We used the Q statistic to examine the presence of heterogeneity in hazard ratio estimates and the I2 statistic to measure the proportion of total variability explained by heterogeneity (32). As determined a priori, any considerable heterogeneity (I2 > 60%) was explored further through sensitivity or stratified analyses. Publication bias was assessed by constructing funnel plots and performing visual inspection for asymmetry. Because of changes made to the study inclusion criteria during the review process, we conducted sensitivity analyses to examine the effect on the summary relative effect estimates of including studies that used a 12-week SVR or adjusted for HBV co-infection. In addition, to examine the effect of varying HCC rates by country, summary estimates were further stratified by geographic region (Asia vs. Europe and North America). We explored the extent to which pooled estimates changed when the number and types of confounders adjusted for in the studies (for example, age, demographic characteristics, and indicators of cirrhosis) were varied. Finally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to determine whether including adjusted versus unadjusted study results affected the final estimate of effect.
In a separate meta-analysis, we obtained pooled incidence rates through a random-effects model using the inverse variance method (33 - 34). A correction factor of 0.5 was added to case counts and person-years of follow-up for studies with zero events. For studies that did not report incidence rates or associated measures of uncertainty, we estimated incidence rates and approximated the log SE as the inverse of the square root of case counts (35). As a result of the geographic, demographic, and clinical variability in the composition of the study populations, we expected inconsistency in study-specific incidence rates and sought to confirm this using the standard statistics mentioned previously.
The evidence summary for this review was prepared in GRADEpro, version 3.6 (McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada).
This research was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Viral Hepatitis, which employed 2 authors who participated in conceptualization, review, and revisions.
Results
Literature Flow
An electronic database search retrieved 10 580 citations. An additional 14 citations were identified through a review of reference lists of relevant studies, gray literature, and data requests submitted to study authors. After duplicates were removed, abstracts of 6407 citations were reviewed and 309 citations were identified, for which full-text articles were obtained. Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria and are considered in this review (17,27,36 - 63).
Comparative Effectiveness of Viral Eradication Versus Failed Response to Treatment on Development of HCC
The 30 included studies comprised 31 528 participants from 17 countries. The average age of participants ranged from 37 to 61 years, and the average length of follow-up after treatment ranged from 2.5 to 14.4 years. Eighteen studies reported on patients at all stages of disease progression (17,27,36,43,45 - 46,49 - 51,53 - 59,61 - 62), 4 provided information for a subset of patients with advanced liver disease (METAVIR score of F3 or F4 or Ishak score of 4 to 6) (53,61,64 - 65), and 12 reported on patients with advanced liver disease only (37 - 42,44,47 - 48,52,60,63). In total, 10 853 patients (34.4%) achieved an SVR to treatment. Approximately 5.5% of all patients developed HCC (n = 1742).
Table 1 displays the characteristics of the 18 observational studies that provide adjusted analyses examining development of HCC among HCV-infected persons at all stages of fibrosis and with advanced liver disease who achieved an SVR or did not respond to treatment (17,27,36 - 38,40,46,50 - 54,56 - 58,60 - 61,63 - 65). Studies that adjusted for confounders, such as age, other demographic characteristics, HBV co-infection, chronologic markers of SVR, or markers of cirrhosis, were interpreted as providing more confidence in the estimate of association.
Table 1. Characteristics of Included Studies
Risk of bias of each primary study was judged on the basis of the findings from the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (Appendix Table 2), and an assessment of the quality of the body of evidence for each outcome was reflected in the GRADE evidence profile (Table 2). Because of the retrospective nature of most included studies, loss to follow-up was rarely reported. Other limitations inherent to observational study designs, such as risk of selection bias, are recognized by the starting point of low confidence in the estimate (low-quality evidence) within the GRADE system for observational evidence. Additional limitations (such as failure of adjustment for fibrosis stage seen in some, but not all, studies) were judged to be insufficient for further rating down of the overall quality for each outcome for the entire body of evidence. The final overall quality of evidence was rated up to moderate confidence in the estimate of effect based on the magnitude of the association, as demonstrated by the consistent reduction seen across studies.
Table 2. Risk of Bias of Included Studies
Table 2. GRADE Evidence Profile for Association of SVR Versus Nonresponse to Treatment With the Development of HCC Among HCV-Infected Persons
HCC Development After Treatment of Hepatitis C in Persons at All Stages of Fibrosis
Pooled analysis of 12 studies (17,27,36,46,50 - 51,53 - 54,56 - 58,61) with a total of 25 497 patients showed that achieving an SVR is associated with a reduction in the relative risk for HCC for persons at all stages of liver disease (hazard ratio, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.31]; P < 0.001) (Figure 1). Approximately 1.5% (n = 145) of the 9185 patients responding to treatment developed HCC, compared with 6.2% (n = 990) of the 16 312 patients who did not respond. As a result, the absolute reduction in risk was 4.6% (CI, 4.2% to 5.0%) for patients achieving an SVR.
Figure 1.
Forest plot of adjusted hazard effects in persons at all stages of fibrosis.
IV = inverse variance; NR = nonresponse; SVR = sustained virologic response.
All of the studies included in the meta-analysis adjusted for age, 9 studies controlled for fibrosis stage (17,27,36,50 - 51,53,57 - 58,61), and some studies (44,52) controlled for fibrosis stage with typical markers for advanced fibrosis. One study did not exclude patients with positive hepatitis B serologic test results, but its model was adjusted for the presence of hepatitis B (27). This same study defined SVR as having an undetectable viral load at 12 weeks. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses examined the effect of geographic location, adjustment for varying confounders, and inclusion of unadjusted studies, but these had no noticeable impact on the overall effect estimate. Heterogeneity tests identified little inconsistency among the included studies (chi-square = 14.05; I2 = 22%).
Among patients who achieved an SVR, 158 developed HCC in an estimated 65 817 person-years of follow-up compared with 1098 cases of HCC in 129 377 person-years of follow-up among nonresponders. In the pooled analysis, HCC developed at a rate of 0.33% per person-year (CI, 0.22% to 0.50%) among persons who achieved SVR compared with 1.67% per person-year (CI, 1.15% to 2.42%) among nonresponders.
Meta-analysis of 6 studies (37 - 38,40,52,60,63) and 2 subanalyses (64 - 65) of 2649 patients with advanced liver disease found that SVR was associated with a similar reduction in the risk for HCC (hazard ratio, 0.23 [CI, 0.16 to 0.35]; P < 0.001) (Figure 2). Overall, 756 patients with advanced liver disease (28.5%) had achieved an SVR; among those, 4.2% developed HCC (n = 32). In contrast, 337 of 1893 nonresponders (17.8%) developed HCC.
Figure 2.
Forest plot of adjusted hazard effects in persons with advanced liver disease.
IV = inverse variance; NR = nonresponse; SVR = sustained virologic response.
All studies adjusted for age and factors known to be predictive of HCC. Four studies adjusted for HCV genotype (37 - 38,60,65). Further subgroup and sensitivity analyses examining the effect of geographic region, adjustment for varying confounders, and inclusion of unadjusted studies found no noticeable effect on the overall estimate of effect. Little or no heterogeneity was identified among the included studies (chi-square = 3.64; I2 = 0%) (Figure 2).
In total, 62 patients who responded to treatment developed HCC during 6934 person-years of follow-up, with an estimated pooled incidence of 1.05% per person-year (CI, 0.73% to 1.50%). In comparison, HCC developed at a rate of 3.30% per person-year (CI, 2.61% to 4.16%) among nonresponders, with 552 developing HCC over 19 841 person-years of follow-up.
Funnel plot asymmetry was seen for the studies presenting adjusted results, suggesting that publication bias could not be entirely excluded (Appendix Figure 2).
Appendix Figure 2.
Funnel plots of studies reporting adjusted (top) and unadjusted (bottom) analyses (all stages of fibrosis and advanced fibrosis).
OR = odds ratio.
Discussion
Attaining treatment-related SVR among persons with HCV is associated with a reduction in the relative risk for HCC. This systematic review summarizes the evidence from 30 observational studies examining the risk for HCC among HCV-infected persons who have been treated and either achieved an SVR or did not respond to therapy. Separate analyses were done to examine the association between an SVR and risk for HCC among persons at all stages of fibrosis and among those with advanced liver fibrosis.
Examining the 2 groups of interest in this study (persons at all stages of fibrosis and persons with advanced liver disease) contributes to understanding the following questions: What is the association between SVR and development of HCC? What is the annual rate of HCC development in persons at all stages of fibrosis compared with persons with advanced liver disease? In which group does treatment-related SVR have an effect at a population level?
Persons in the earlier stages of liver disease progression are more likely to respond to treatment than those in the later stages, specifically persons with bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis (67). This suggests that targeting persons at lower fibrosis stages for treatment is more effective in achieving an SVR than initiating treatment after liver disease has progressed to advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Still, regardless of this difference in SVR attainment, the relative risk reduction for HCC is similar between the groups. On the one hand, this would suggest that treating persons in the earlier stages of disease would be more efficient because of the better chance of achieving an SVR after treatment. On the other hand, when the 3-fold baseline risk for HCC among persons with advanced liver disease versus those in all stages of disease progression is taken into account at the population level, more cases of HCC are prevented when persons with advanced liver disease achieve an SVR, providing a higher absolute benefit.
This study controls for relevant variables by analyzing adjusted effect measures and conducting sensitivity analyses on possible confounders, and it reduces overreporting of certain study findings by including only studies with mutually exclusive study populations, thereby increasing confidence in the effect estimates of the intervention. However, some limitations remain for which we could not account. First, although we conducted a comprehensive systematic review of findings across 6 databases, including conference abstracts and gray literature, articles not written in English were excluded and some studies may have been missed. Second, almost all included studies were done in Asia, and evidence suggests that rates of HCC are higher in Asian populations than in European or U.S. populations (1). Although this should not impact the relative effect estimate, the absolute benefit of viral suppression may be overstated. However, because we identified a higher proportion of persons in studies from Western countries, this should not impact the effect estimate. No significant difference was identified in a subgroup analysis comparing studies done in the 2 geographic areas. Third, we could not completely exclude publication bias because the funnel plot of studies reporting adjusted results showed some asymmetry. Because most of the studies had retrospective designs and were more likely to be written and published if they provided significant results, publication bias could account for some—but probably not all—of the observed effect.
These limitations notwithstanding, our findings show a protective effect of treatment-related SVR on the development of HCC among HCV-infected persons at all stages of fibrosis and among those with advanced liver disease. With the availability of newer and more effective therapies, SVR rates can be increased and HCC incidence rates can be reduced in HCV-infected persons. The association between SVR and HCC should be considered when weighing the benefits and harms of identifying and treating HCV-infected persons.
References
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Globocan 2008: Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. IARC CancerBase No. 10. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Accessed at http://globocan.iarc.fr on 6 November 2012.
Armstrong GL, Wasley A, Simard EP, McQuillan GM, Kuhnert WL, Alter MJ. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1999 through 2002. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:705-14.
PubMed
PubMed
Armstrong GL, Alter MJ, McQuillan GM, Margolis HS. The past incidence of hepatitis C virus infection: implications for the future burden of chronic liver disease in the United States. Hepatology. 2000;31:777-82.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Viral Hepatitis Surveillance—United States, 2010. Atlanta Centers for Disease Control and Prevention2012;1-71.
Rein DB, Smith BD, Wittenborn JS, Lesesne SB, Wagner LD, Roblin DW, et al. The cost-effectiveness of birth-cohort screening for hepatitis C antibody in U.S. primary care settings. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:263-70.
PubMed
PubMed
McGarry LJ, Pawar VS, Panchmatia HR, Rubin JL, Davis GL, Younossi ZM, et al. Economic model of a birth cohort screening program for hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 2012;55:1344-55.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Ly KN, Xing J, Klevens RM, Jiles RB, Ward JW, Holmberg SD. The increasing burden of mortality from viral hepatitis in the United States between 1999 and 2007. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:271-8.
PubMed
PubMed
Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Reichman ME. Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1485-91.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in USA. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:Suppl 2S88-94.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Thomas DL, Seeff LB. Natural history of hepatitis C. Clin Liver Dis. 2005;9:383-98, vi.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Rein DB, Wittenborn JS, Weinbaum CM, Sabin M, Smith BD, Lesesne SB. Forecasting the morbidity and mortality associated with prevalent cases of pre-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C in the United States. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43:66-72.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: an update. Hepatology. 2009;49:1335-74.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Namikawa M, Kakizaki S, Yata Y, Yamazaki Y, Horiguchi N, Sato K, et al. Optimal follow-up time to determine the sustained virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving pegylated-interferon and ribavirin. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:69-75.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Backus LI, Boothroyd DB, Phillips BR, Belperio P, Halloran J, Mole LA. A sustained virologic response reduces risk of all-cause mortality in patients with hepatitis C. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:509-516.e1.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Bruno S, Battezzati PM, Bellati G, Manzin A, Maggioni M, Crosignani A, et al. Long-term beneficial effects in sustained responders to interferon-alfa therapy for chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2001;34:748-55.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Calvaruso V, Di Marco V, Ferraro D, Pizzillo P, Alaimo G, Craxì A. Liver related events and survival in patients with compensated HCV cirrhosis: the role of sustained virological response to PEG-IFN based therapy and portal hypertension. Presented at Italian Association for the Study of the Liver Annual Meeting 2011, 24–25 February 2011, Rome, Italy. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43:S99.
CrossRef
CrossRef
Pradat P, Tillmann HL, Sauleda S, Braconier JH, Saracco G, Thursz M, et al, HENCORE Group. Long-term follow-up of the hepatitis C HENCORE cohort: response to therapy and occurrence of liver-related complications. J Viral Hepat. 2007;14:556-63.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Singal AG, Volk ML, Jensen D, Di Bisceglie AM, Schoenfeld PS. A sustained viral response is associated with reduced liver-related morbidity and mortality in patients with hepatitis C virus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:280-8, 288.e1.
PubMed
PubMed
Ghany MG, Nelson DR, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB, American Association for Study of Liver Diseases. An update on treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection: 2011 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2011;54:1433-44.
PubMed
PubMed
Jacobson IM, McHutchison JG, Dusheiko G, Di Bisceglie AM, Reddy KR, Bzowej NH, et al, ADVANCE Study Team. Telaprevir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2405-16.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Poordad F, McCone J Jr, Bacon BR, Bruno S, Manns MP, Sulkowski MS, et al, SPRINT-2 Investigators. Boceprevir for untreated chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1195-206.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Cammà C, Di Bona D, Craxì A. The impact of antiviral treatments on the course of chronic hepatitis C: an evidence-based approach. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10:2123-30.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Singal AK, Singh A, Jaganmohan S, Guturu P, Mummadi R, Kuo YF, et al. Antiviral therapy reduces risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:192-9.
PubMed
PubMed
Zhang CH, Xu GL, Jia WD, Li JS, Ma JL, Ge YS. Effects of interferon treatment on development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic virus infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:1254-64.
PubMed
PubMed
Ng V, Saab S. Effects of a sustained virologic response on outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:923-30.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Pearlman BL, Traub N. Sustained virologic response to antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a cure and so much more. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:889-900.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Kramer JR, Davila JA, Duan Z, Richardson PA, Kanwal F, El-Serag H. Antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus is associated with a reduced risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in a national cohort of U.S. veterans. Presented at Digestive Disease Week 2011, 7–11 May 2011, Chicago. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:5 Suppl 1S899.
Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2011. Accessed at www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm on 14 November 2012.
Schünemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, eds. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. Version 3.6. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: McMaster University, GRADE Working Group; 2011. Accessed at http://ims.cochrane.org/revman/gradepro on 14 November 2012.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al, GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924-6.
PubMed
PubMed
Woods BS, Hawkins N, Scott DA. Network meta-analysis on the log-hazard scale, combining count and hazard ratio statistics accounting for multi-arm trials: a tutorial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:54.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Huedo-Medina TB, Sánchez-Meca J, Marín-Martínez F, Botella J. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychol Methods. 2006;11:193-206.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-88.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Fleiss JL. The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 1993;2:121-45.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Greenland S, Rothman KJ. Introduction to categorical statistics. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, eds. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia Lippincott-Raven1998;231-52.
Asahina Y, Tsuchiya K, Tamaki N, Hirayama I, Tanaka T, Sato M, et al. Effect of aging on risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 2010;52:518-27.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Braks RE, Ganne-Carrie N, Fontaine H, Paries J, Grando-Lemaire V, Beaugrand M, et al. Effect of sustained virological response on long-term clinical outcome in 113 patients with compensated hepatitis C-related cirrhosis treated by interferon alpha and ribavirin. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:5648-53.
PubMed
PubMed
Bruno S, Stroffolini T, Colombo M, Bollani S, Benvegnù L, Mazzella G, et al, Italian Association of the Study of the Liver Disease (AISF). Sustained virological response to interferon-alpha is associated with improved outcome in HCV-related cirrhosis: a retrospective study. Hepatology. 2007;45:579-87.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Bruno S, Zuin M, Crosignani A, Rossi S, Zadra F, Roffi L, et al. Predicting mortality risk in patients with compensated HCV-induced cirrhosis: a long-term prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1147-58.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Cardoso AC, Moucari R, Figueiredo-Mendes C, Ripault MP, Giuily N, Castelnau C, et al. Impact of peginterferon and ribavirin therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma: incidence and survival in hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2010;52:652-7.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Cheinquer N, Cheinquer H, Wolff FH, Coelho-Borges S. Effect of sustained virologic response on the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with HCV cirrhosis. Braz J Infect Dis. 2010;14:457-61.
PubMed
PubMed
D'Ambrosio R, Aghemo A, Rumi MG, Primignani M, Dell'Era A, Lampertico P, et al. The course of esophageal varices in patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis responding to interferon/ribavirin therapy. Antivir Ther. 2011;16:677-84.
PubMed
PubMed
Dohmen K, Takahashi K, Kawano A, Shigematsu H, Tanaka H, Ichiki Y, et al. Development of hepatocellular carcinoma after peginterferon plus ribavirin therapy in chronic hepatitis C. Presented at 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases: The Liver Meeting 2011, 4–8 November 2011, San Francisco. Hepatology. 2011;54:1400A.
Fernández-Rodríguez CM, Alonso S, Martinez SM, Forns X, Sanchez-Tapias JM, Rincón D, et al, Group for the Assessment of Prevention of Cirrhosis Complications and Virological Response (APREVIR). Peginterferon plus ribavirin and sustained virological response in HCV-related cirrhosis: outcomes and factors predicting response. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2164-72.
PubMed
PubMed
Giannini E, Fasoli A, Botta F, Testa E, Romagnoli P, Ceppa P, et al. Long-term follow up of chronic hepatitis C patients after alpha-interferon treatment: a functional study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16:399-405.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Hung CH, Lee CM, Wang JH, Hu TH, Chen CH, Lin CY, et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus on incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with interferon-based antiviral therapy. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:2344-52.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Iacobellis A, Perri F, Valvano MR, Caruso N, Niro GA, Andriulli A. Long-term outcome after antiviral therapy of patients with hepatitis C virus infection and decompensated cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:249-53.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Jamil KM, Cheng W, Tarquinio L, Adams L, Mollison L, Macquillan G, et al. The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensation following hepatitis C treatment with interferon-based therapy. Gut. 2007;56:A126.
CrossRef
CrossRef
Kashiwagi K, Furusyo N, Kubo N, Nakashima H, Nomura H, Kashiwagi S, et al. A prospective comparison of the effect of interferon-alpha and interferon-beta treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C on the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma development. J Infect Chemother. 2003;9:333-40.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Kawamura Y, Arase Y, Ikeda K, Hirakawa M, Hosaka T, Kobayashi M, et al. Diabetes enhances hepatocarcinogenesis in noncirrhotic, interferon-treated hepatitis C patients. Am J Med. 2010;123:951-956.e1.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Kurokawa M, Hiramatsu N, Oze T, Mochizuki K, Yakushijin T, Kurashige N, et al. Effect of interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin therapy on incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis. Hepatol Res. 2009;39:432-8.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Morgan TR, Ghany MG, Kim HY, Snow KK, Shiffman ML, De Santo JL, et al, HALT-C Trial Group. Outcome of sustained virological responders with histologically advanced chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2010;52:833-44.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Okanoue T, Itoh Y, Kirishima T, Daimon Y, Toyama T, Morita A, et al. Transient biochemical response in interferon therapy decreases the development of hepatocellular carcinoma for five years and improves the long-term survival of chronic hepatitis C patients. Hepatol Res. 2002;23:62-77.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Osaki Y, Ueda Y, Marusawa H, Nakajima J, Kimura T, Kita R, et al. Decrease in alpha-fetoprotein levels predicts reduced incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus infection receiving interferon therapy: a single center study. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:444-51.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Shindo M, Hamada K, Oda Y, Okuno T. Long-term follow-up study of sustained biochemical responders with interferon therapy. Hepatology. 2001;33:1299-302.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Sinn DH, Paik SW, Kang P, Kil JS, Park SU, Lee SY, et al. Disease progression and the risk factor analysis for chronic hepatitis C. Liver Int. 2008;28:1363-9.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Takahashi H, Mizuta T, Eguchi Y, Kawaguchi Y, Kuwashiro T, Oeda S, et al. Post-challenge hyperglycemia is a significant risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:790-8.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Tateyama M, Yatsuhashi H, Taura N, Motoyoshi Y, Nagaoka S, Yanagi K, et al. Alpha-fetoprotein above normal levels as a risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients infected with hepatitis C virus. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:92-100.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Tamura Y, Yamagiwa S, Aoki Y, Kurita S, Suda T, Ohkoshi S, et al, Niigata Liver Disease Study Group. Serum alpha-fetoprotein levels during and after interferon therapy and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2530-7.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Velosa J, Serejo F, Marinho R, Nunes J, Glória H. Eradication of hepatitis C virus reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:1853-61.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Yoshida H, Shiratori Y, Moriyama M, Arakawa Y, Ide T, Sata M, et al. Interferon therapy reduces the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma: national surveillance program of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan. IHIT Study Group. Inhibition of Hepatocarcinogenesis by Interferon Therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:174-81.
PubMed
PubMed
Coverdale SA, Khan MH, Byth K, Lin R, Weltman M, George J, et al. Effects of interferon treatment response on liver complications of chronic hepatitis C: 9-year follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:636-44.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
van der Meer AJ, Hansen BE, Feld JJ, Wedemeyer H, Dufour JF, Lammert F, et al. Factors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced liver fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2012;56(S2):S363-4.
Hasegawa E, Kobayashi M, Kawamura Y, Yatsuji H, Sezaki H, Hosaka T, et al. Efficacy and anticarcinogenic activity of interferon for hepatitis C virus-related compensated cirrhosis in patients with genotype 1b low viral load or genotype 2. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:793-800.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Hung CH, Lee CM, Lu SN, Wang JH, Hu TH, Tung HD, et al. Long-term effect of interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin therapy on incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. J Viral Hepat. 2006;13:409-14.
PubMed
CrossRef
PubMed
CrossRef
Shiratori Y, Ito Y, Yokosuka O, Imazeki F, Nakata R, Tanaka N, et al, Tokyo-Chiba Hepatitis Research Group. Antiviral therapy for cirrhotic hepatitis C: association with reduced hepatocellular carcinoma development and improved survival. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:105-14.
PubMed
PubMed
No comments:
Post a Comment